100 research outputs found

    Sustained impairment of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response is responsible for recurrent episodes of disseminated HCMV infection in a D+R- hand transplant recipient

    Get PDF
    Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is the major viral complication in solid organ transplant recipients. Seronegative recipents (R-) of organs from seropositive donors (D+) appear to be at higher risk of developing symptomatic HCMV infection. To what extent systemic life-threatening complications can be risked for non-life-saving transplant procedures? A case report describing successful treatment of repeated episodes of active HCMV infection in a D+R- hand recipient in the absence of HCMV-specific T-cell immunity is presented. In the attempt to save both the patient and the transplanted hand, a preemptive treatment strategy was adopted with the aim to boost the constitution of the virus-specific T-cell immune response and simultaneously avoid onset of disease. Careful monitoring of HCMV load in blood and HCMV-specific T-cell immunity guided administration of repeated courses of antiviral treatment and avoided emergence of HCMV-related symptoms. Following establishment of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell response, preemptive treatment was no longer required due to sustained HCMV disappearance from blood. The patient is now well, and his hand too. In conclusion, evaluation of virus-specific T-cell immunity is of crucial importance in D+R- transplant recipients and careful monitoring of HCMV-specific T cell mediated response should always parallel monitoring of HCMV load in transplant recipients

    Extended ganciclovir prophylaxis in lung transplantation.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Positive cytomegaloviral status of the donor or of the recipient adversely affects survival and enhances the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung transplant recipients. The role of ganciclovir prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus infection in respect to obliterative bronchiolitis or to BOS development is not known. METHODS: From the Papworth transplant database, we identified 146 patients who received organs from cytomegalovirus-positive donors. We classified patients into 3 groups as follows: Group 1 consisted of 42 patients who underwent transplantation between 1990 and 1992 when no prophylaxis was given; Group 2 consisted of 49 patients who underwent transplantation between 1992 and 1995 when 4 weeks of IV ganciclovir was given as prophylaxis; and Group 3 consisted of 55 patients who underwent transplantation between 1995 and 1998 when cytomegalovirus prophylaxis consisted of IV (1 week) followed by oral ganciclovir for a total of 3 months. Donor management, recipient management during and after surgery, and pharmacotherapy were uniform during the study period. We used survival and regression methods to compare these groups, adjusting for the transplantation type (single lung, double lung, or heart-lung) and for HLA typing. RESULTS: We found a significant difference among all 3 groups in numbers of cytomegaloviral disease episodes in the 1st year after transplantation. The number of rejection episodes in the 3 groups during the 1st post-transplant year gradually decreased from Group 1 to Group 3. We identified no statistically significant benefit in the time to BOS occurrence or in actuarial survival. CONCLUSION: Extended prophylaxis with IV and oral ganciclovir practically abolishes cytomegaloviral disease and is related to a decreased incidence of rejection episodes. However, ganciclovir prophylaxis is not related to a decreased incidence or progression of BOS or survival
    • …
    corecore