What Are the Rates and Causes of Hospital Readmission After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) and related interventions such as revision TKA and the treatment of infected TKAs are commonly performed procedures. Hospital readmission rates are used to measure hospital performance, but risk factors (both medical and surgical) for readmission after TKA, revision TKA, and treatment for the infected TKA have not been well characterized.Questions/purposesWe measured (1) the unplanned hospital readmission rate in primary TKA and revision TKA, including antibiotic-spacer staged revision TKA to treat infection. We also evaluated (2) the medical and surgical causes of readmission and (3) risk factors associated with unplanned hospital readmission.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included a total of 1408 patients (1032 primary TKAs, 262 revision TKAs, 113 revision of infected TKAs) from one institution. All hospital readmissions within 90 days of discharge were evaluated for timing and cause. Diagnoses at readmission were categorized as surgical or medical. Readmission risk was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model that incorporated patient demographics and medical comorbidities.ResultsThe unplanned readmission rate for the entire cohort was 4% at 30 days and 8% at 90 days. At 90 days postoperatively, revision of an infected TKA had the highest readmission rate, followed by revision TKA, with primary TKA having the lowest rate. Approximately three-fourths of readmissions were the result of surgical causes, mostly infection, arthrofibrosis, and cellulitis, whereas the remainder of readmissions were the result of medical causes. Procedure type (primary TKA versus revision TKA or staged treatment for infected TKA), hospital stay more than 5 days, discharge destination, and a fluid/electrolyte abnormality were each associated with risk of unplanned readmission.ConclusionsPatients having revision TKA, whether for infection or other causes, are more likely to have an unplanned readmission to the hospital than are patients having primary TKA. When assessing hospital performance for TKA, it is important to distinguish among these surgical procedures

Causes and Frequency of Unplanned Hospital Readmission After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is a beneficial and cost-effective procedure for patients with osteoarthritis. Recent initiatives to improve hospital quality of care include assessing unplanned hospital readmission rates. Patients presenting for THA have different indications and medical comorbidities that may impact rates of readmission.Questions/purposesThis study measured (1) the unplanned hospital readmission rate in primary THA, revision THA, and antibiotic-spacer staged revision THA to treat infection. Additionally, we determined (2) the medical and surgical causes of readmission; and (3) the risk factors associated with unplanned readmission.MethodsA total of 1415 patients (988 primary THA, 344 revision THA, 82 antibiotic-spacer staged revision THA to treat infection) from a single institution were included. All hospital readmissions within 90 days of discharge were reviewed. Patient demographics and medical comorbidities were included in a Cox proportional hazards model to assess risk of readmission.ResultsThe overall unplanned readmission rate was 4% at 30 days and 7% at 90 days. At 90 days, primary THA (5%) had a lower unplanned readmission rate than revision THA (10%, p < 0.001) and antibiotic-spacer staged revision THA (18%, p < 0.001). Medical diagnoses were responsible for almost one-fourth of unplanned readmissions, whereas over half of surgical readmissions were the result of dislocation, surgical site infection, and postoperative hematoma. Type of procedure, hospital stay greater than 5 days, cardiac valvular disease, diabetes with end-organ complications, and substance abuse were each associated with increased risk of unplanned readmission.ConclusionsHigher rates of unplanned hospital readmissions in revision THA rather than primary THA suggest that healthcare quality measures that incorporate readmission rates as a proxy for quality of care should distinguish between primary and revision procedures. Failure to do so may negatively impact tertiary referral hospitals that often care for patients requiring complex revision procedures

Most Readmissions Following Ankle Open Reduction Internal Fixation are Unrelated to Surgical Site Issues

Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures are commonly-sustained injuries, and frequently require open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). It is generally a safe and effective surgical procedure, however, as quality-based reimbursement models become increasingly affected by readmissions within thirty days, it is important to determine causes and risk factors for patients to be readmitted after discharge. Methods: Patients that underwent ORIF for ankle fractures were identified from the prospectively-collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2013 to 2014. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and fracture characteristics (open vs. closed, location of fracture such as lateral malleolus, medial malleolus, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar) were determined. Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used as a measure of overall comorbidity burden. Rates of thirty-day adverse events and readmissions were determined, as well as the causes for readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors significantly associated with having any adverse events and being readmitted within thirty days of surgery. Results: 5,056 ankle ORIF patients were included. 167 (3.3%) were open fractures. The rate of any postoperative adverse event was 5.2%. There were 127 readmissions, with 116 (91.3%) being unplanned readmissions. Of the 116 unplanned readmissions, 49 (42.2%) were for reasons related to the surgery or surgical site, with the most common causes being deep surgical site/hardware infection (12.9%), superficial site infection (11.2%), and wound disruption (6.9%). Most readmissions were for reasons unrelated to the surgical site (51.7%), including cardiac disorders (8.6%), pulmonary disorders (7.8%), and neurologic/psychiatric disorders (6.9%). With multivariable logistic regression, the strongest risk factors for readmission were history of pulmonary disease (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.29), ASA ≥ 3 (OR 2.28), and open fracture (OR 2.04, all p < 0.05). (Figure 1) Conclusion: Postoperative readmissions following ankle fracture ORIF are important to consider in this era of quality-based hospital reimbursement models. In this cohort of 5,056 ankle ORIF cases, 2.5% of patients were readmitted within thirty days, with 51.7% of all unplanned readmissions due to causes unrelated to the surgery or surgical site. This suggests that close medical follow-up with non-orthopaedic providers may be necessary after discharge. To assist clinicians in preoperative risk stratification, predictors of readmission were history of pulmonary disease, increased ASA class, and open fracture. Higher bundled reimbursements may be justified for cases with these risk factors

Clinical presentation and outcomes associated with fabellectomy in the setting of fabella syndrome

Background: Clinical outcomes pertaining to isolated lateral fabellectomy in the setting of fabella syndrome are limited to small case reports at this time. Purpose: To assess the most common presenting symptoms, clinical outcomes, and satisfaction after fabella excision in the setting of fabella syndrome. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Consecutive patients with a minimum of 21-month follow-up after isolated fabellectomy for fabella syndrome were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical outcome scores of the following domains were collected: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and Lysholm knee survey, along with a simple numeric patient satisfaction score (range, 1-10; 10 = ?very satisfied?). Statistical analysis was performed using paired t tests for all clinical outcome data. Results: A total of 11 isolated fabella excisions were included in 10 patients with isolated lateral-sided knee pain in the setting of fabella syndrome (8 males, 2 females), with a mean age of 36.9 years (range, 23-58 years) and a mean follow-up of 2.4 years (range, 21-47 months). A total of 8 patients (80%) were able to return to full desired activities, including sports. Only 5 of 11 (45%) excisions had concomitant lateral femoral condyle cartilage pathology. There were significant improvements across multiple WOMAC domains, and the WOMAC total score improved from 28.5 ± 17.6 preoperatively to 11.6 ± 10.2 postoperatively (P < .05). Lysholm scores significantly improved from 66.6 ± 23.1 preoperatively to 80.2 ± 13.9 postoperatively (P = .044). Overall patient-reported satisfaction was 8.8 ± 1.6. Conclusion: Fabella excision in the setting of fabella syndrome demonstrated improvements in clinical outcome scores, high rate of returning to preinjury level of activities, and low risk of complications or need for additional surgical procedures

Arthroscopically Assisted Open Reduction–Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: Significance of the Arthroscopic Ankle Drive-through Sign

Standalone open reduction–internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures is the current standard of care. Intraoperative stress radiographs are useful for assessing the extent of ligamentous disruption, but arthroscopic visualization has been shown to be more accurate. Concomitant arthroscopy at the time of ankle fracture ORIF is useful for accurately diagnosing and managing syndesmotic and deltoid ligament injuries. The arthroscopic ankle drive-through sign is characterized by the ability to pass a 2.9-mm shaver (Smith &amp; Nephew, Andover, MA) easily through the medial ankle gutter during arthroscopy, which is not usually possible with both an intact deltoid ligament and syndesmosis. This arthroscopic maneuver indicates instability after ankle reduction and fixation and is predictive of the need for further stabilization. Furthermore, when this sign remains positive after fracture fixation, it may guide the surgeon to further evaluate the adequacy of fixation for the possible need for further fixation of the syndesmosis or deltoid. We present the case of an ankle fracture managed with arthroscopy-assisted ORIF and describe the clinical utility of the arthroscopic ankle drive-through sign

Most Readmissions Following Ankle Fracture Surgery Are Unrelated to Surgical Site Issues

Background: Ankle fracture surgeries are generally safe and effective procedures; however, as quality-based reimbursement models are increasingly affected by postoperative readmission, we aimed to determine the causes and risk factors for readmission following ankle fracture surgery. Methods: Ankle fracture cases were identified from the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2013 to 2014. Demographics, comorbidities, and fracture characteristics were collected. Rates of 30-day adverse events and readmissions were determined as well as the causes for readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with having any adverse events and being readmitted within 30 days of surgery. Results: There were 5056 patients included; 167 (3.3%) were open fractures. The rate of any postoperative adverse event was 5.2%. There were 116 unplanned readmissions, with a readmission rate of 2.3%. Of the 116 unplanned readmissions, 49 (42.2%) were for reasons related to the surgery or surgical site, with the most common causes being deep surgical site/hardware infections (12.9%), superficial site infections (11.2%), and wound disruption (6.9%). Most readmissions were for reasons unrelated to the surgical site (51.7%), including cardiac disorders (8.6%), pulmonary disorders (7.8%), and neurological/psychiatric disorders (6.9%). The cause of readmission was unknown for 6% of readmissions. With multivariable logistic regression, the strongest risk factors for readmission were a history of pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.29), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥3 (OR, 2.28), and open fractures (OR, 2.04) (all P < .05). Conclusion: In this cohort of 5056 ankle fracture cases, 2.3% of patients were readmitted within 30 days, with at least 51.7% of all unplanned readmissions due to causes unrelated to the surgery or surgical site. Predictors of readmission included a history of pulmonary disease, higher ASA class, and open fractures. Based on these findings, we advocate close medical follow-up with nonorthopaedic providers after discharge for high-risk patients. Level of Evidence: Level III

Republication of “Most Readmissions Following Ankle Fracture Surgery Are Unrelated to Surgical Site Issues: An Analysis of 5056 Cases”

Background: Ankle fracture surgeries are generally safe and effective procedures; however, as quality-based reimbursement models are increasingly affected by postoperative readmission, we aimed to determine the causes and risk factors for readmission following ankle fracture surgery. Methods: Ankle fracture cases were identified from the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2013 to 2014. Demographics, comorbidities, and fracture characteristics were collected. Rates of 30-day adverse events and readmissions were determined as well as the causes for readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with having any adverse events and being readmitted within 30 days of surgery. Results: There were 5056 patients included; 167 (3.3%) were open fractures. The rate of any postoperative adverse event was 5.2%. There were 116 unplanned readmissions, with a readmission rate of 2.3%. Of the 116 unplanned readmissions, 49 (42.2%) were for reasons related to the surgery or surgical site, with the most common causes being deep surgical site/hardware infections (12.9%), superficial site infections (11.2%), and wound disruption (6.9%). Most readmissions were for reasons unrelated to the surgical site (51.7%), including cardiac disorders (8.6%), pulmonary disorders (7.8%), and neurological/psychiatric disorders (6.9%). The cause of readmission was unknown for 6% of readmissions. With multivariable logistic regression, the strongest risk factors for readmission were a history of pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.29), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥3 (OR, 2.28), and open fractures (OR, 2.04) (all P < .05). Conclusion: In this cohort of 5056 ankle fracture cases, 2.3% of patients were readmitted within 30 days, with at least 51.7% of all unplanned readmissions due to causes unrelated to the surgery or surgical site. Predictors of readmission included a history of pulmonary disease, higher ASA class, and open fractures. Based on these findings, we advocate close medical follow-up with nonorthopaedic providers after discharge for high-risk patients. Level of Evidence: Level III