Using HAQ-DI to estimate HUI-3 and EQ-5D utility values for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Spain

AbstractBackground/ObjectiveUtility values are not usually assessed in clinical trials and do not allow cost-utility analysis to be performed with the data collected. The aim of this study was to derive relation functions so that Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores could be used to estimate Health Utilities Index - 3 (HUI-3) and EQ-5D utility values for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsAn observational, cross-sectional, naturalistic, multicentre study was conducted. A total of 244 patients aged 18 years or older, with RA according to American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria, were recruited. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were recorded and patients completed three generic HRQoL questionnaires: the HAQ-DI, the HUI-3, and the EQ-5D. Two linear regression models were used to predict HUI-3 and EQ-5D utility values as functions of HAQ-DI scores, age, and gender.ResultsPatient mean age was 57.8 years old (standard deviation [SD], 13.3 years); 75.8% of the patients were women and 95.9% were white. Mean disease duration was 10.8 years (SD, 9 years). Patient distribution according to HAQ-DI severity was as follows: HAQ-DI < 0.5, 29%; 0.5 ≤ HAQ-DI < 1.1, 28%; 1.1 ≤ HAQ-DI < 1.6, 16%,1.6 ≤ HAQ-DI < 2.1, 15%; and HAQ-DI ≥ 2.1, 12%. HAQ-DI and EQ-5D mean scores were 1.02 (SD, 0.78) and 63.1 (SD, 20.3), respectively. Mean utility values for HUI-3 and time trade-off (TTO) were 0.75 (SD, 0.21) and 0.65 (SD, 0.3), respectively. The equations converting HAQ-DI scores to utilities were HUI-3 = 0.9527 – (0.2018 × HAQ-DI) +ε (R2=0.56), and TTO = 0.9567 – (0.309 × HAQ-DI) + ε (R2=0.54). Error distribution was non-normal. Age and gender were found to have no bearing on the utility functions.ConclusionsHAQ-DI scores can be used to estimate HUI-3 and EQ-5D utility values for patients with RA in data obtained from studies where utility values have not been collected

Neighbourhood-related socioeconomic perinatal health inequalities: An illustration of the mediational g-formula and considerations for the big data context

BACKGROUND: Advances in computing power have enabled the collection, linkage and processing of big data. Big data in conjunction with robust causal inference methods can be used to answer research questions regarding the mechanisms underlying an exposure-outcome relationship. The g-formula is a flexible approach to perform causal mediation analysis that is suited for the big data context. Although this approach has many advantages, it is underused in perinatal epidemiology and didactic explanation for its implementation is still limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this was to provide a didactic application of the mediational g-formula by means of perinatal health inequalities research. METHODS: The analytical procedure of the mediational g-formula is illustrated by investigating whether the relationship between neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) and small for gestational age (SGA) is mediated by neighbourhood social environment. Data on singleton births that occurred in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2017 (n = 1,217,626) were obtained from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry and linked to sociodemographic national registry data and neighbourhood-level data. The g-formula settings corresponded to a hypothetical improvement in neighbourhood SES from disadvantaged to non-disadvantaged. RESULTS: At the population level, a hypothetical improvement in neighbourhood SES resulted in a 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2, 7.5) relative reduction in the proportion of SGA, that is the total effect. The total effect was decomposed into the natural direct effect (5.6%, 95% CI 5.1, 6.1) and the natural indirect effect (0.7%, 95% CI 0.6, 0.9). In terms of the magnitude of mediation, it was observed the natural indirect effect accounted for 11.4% (95% CI 9.2, 13.6) of the total effect of neighbourhood SES on SGA. CONCLUSIONS: The mediational g-formula is a flexible approach to perform causal mediation analysis that is suited for big data contexts in perinatal health research. Its application can contribute to providing valuable insights for the development of policy and public health interventions

Social determinants of vulnerability in the population of reproductive age: a systematic review

Background: The health of an (unborn) child is largely determined by the health and social determinants of its parents. The extent to which social determinants of parents or prospective parents affect their own health depends partly on their coping or resilience abilities. Inadequate abilities allow negative effects of unfavourable social determinants to prevail, rendering them vulnerable to adverse health outcomes. Addressing these determinants in the reproductive-aged population is therefore a key approach in improving the health of the future generation. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on social determinants of vulnerability, i.e., inadequate coping or low resilience, in the general population of reproductive age. Methods: The databases EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were systematically searched from database inception to December 2th 2021. Observational studies examining social determinants and demographics in relation to vulnerability among the general population of reproductive age (men and women aged 18-40 years), conducted in a high-income country in Europe or North America, Australia or New Zealand were eligible for inclusion. Relevant data was extracted from each included article and findings were presented in a narrative and tabulated manner. Results: We identified 40,028 unique articles, of which 78 were full text reviewed. Twenty-five studies were included, of which 21 had a cross-sectional study design (84%). Coping was the most frequently assessed outcome measure (n = 17, 68%). Thirty social determinants were identified. Overall, a younger age, lower socioeconomic attainment, lack of connection with the social environment, and adverse life events were associated with inadequate coping or low resilience. Conclusions: This review shows that certain social determinants are associated with vulnerability in reproductive-aged individuals. Knowing which factors make people more or less vulnerable carries health-related implications. More high-quality research is needed to obtain substantial evidence on the strength of the effect of these social conditions in this stage of life

Social determinants of vulnerability in the population of reproductive age: a systematic review

Abstract Background The health of an (unborn) child is largely determined by the health and social determinants of its parents. The extent to which social determinants of parents or prospective parents affect their own health depends partly on their coping or resilience abilities. Inadequate abilities allow negative effects of unfavourable social determinants to prevail, rendering them vulnerable to adverse health outcomes. Addressing these determinants in the reproductive-aged population is therefore a key approach in improving the health of the future generation. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on social determinants of vulnerability, i.e., inadequate coping or low resilience, in the general population of reproductive age. Methods The databases EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were systematically searched from database inception to December 2th 2021. Observational studies examining social determinants and demographics in relation to vulnerability among the general population of reproductive age (men and women aged 18-40 years), conducted in a high-income country in Europe or North America, Australia or New Zealand were eligible for inclusion. Relevant data was extracted from each included article and findings were presented in a narrative and tabulated manner. Results We identified 40,028 unique articles, of which 78 were full text reviewed. Twenty-five studies were included, of which 21 had a cross-sectional study design (84%). Coping was the most frequently assessed outcome measure (n = 17, 68%). Thirty social determinants were identified. Overall, a younger age, lower socioeconomic attainment, lack of connection with the social environment, and adverse life events were associated with inadequate coping or low resilience. Conclusions This review shows that certain social determinants are associated with vulnerability in reproductive-aged individuals. Knowing which factors make people more or less vulnerable carries health-related implications. More high-quality research is needed to obtain substantial evidence on the strength of the effect of these social conditions in this stage of life

Social determinants of vulnerability in the population of reproductive age: a systematic review

Abstract Background The health of an (unborn) child is largely determined by the health and social determinants of its parents. The extent to which social determinants of parents or prospective parents affect their own health depends partly on their coping or resilience abilities. Inadequate abilities allow negative effects of unfavourable social determinants to prevail, rendering them vulnerable to adverse health outcomes. Addressing these determinants in the reproductive-aged population is therefore a key approach in improving the health of the future generation. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on social determinants of vulnerability, i.e., inadequate coping or low resilience, in the general population of reproductive age. Methods The databases EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were systematically searched from database inception to December 2th 2021. Observational studies examining social determinants and demographics in relation to vulnerability among the general population of reproductive age (men and women aged 18-40 years), conducted in a high-income country in Europe or North America, Australia or New Zealand were eligible for inclusion. Relevant data was extracted from each included article and findings were presented in a narrative and tabulated manner. Results We identified 40,028 unique articles, of which 78 were full text reviewed. Twenty-five studies were included, of which 21 had a cross-sectional study design (84%). Coping was the most frequently assessed outcome measure (n = 17, 68%). Thirty social determinants were identified. Overall, a younger age, lower socioeconomic attainment, lack of connection with the social environment, and adverse life events were associated with inadequate coping or low resilience. Conclusions This review shows that certain social determinants are associated with vulnerability in reproductive-aged individuals. Knowing which factors make people more or less vulnerable carries health-related implications. More high-quality research is needed to obtain substantial evidence on the strength of the effect of these social conditions in this stage of life

Term perinatal mortality audit in the Netherlands 2010-2012: a population-based cohort study

To assess the implementation and first results of a term perinatal internal audit by a standardised method. Population-based cohort study. All 90 Dutch hospitals with obstetric/paediatric departments linked to community practices of midwives, general practitioners in their attachment areas, organised in perinatal cooperation groups (PCG). The population consisted of 943 registered term perinatal deaths occurring in 2010-2012 with detailed information, including 707 cases with completed audit results. Participation in the audit, perinatal death classification, identification of substandard factors (SSF), SSF in relation to death, conclusive recommendations for quality improvement in perinatal care and antepartum risk selection at the start of labour. After the introduction of the perinatal audit in 2010, all PCGs participated. They organised 645 audit sessions, with an average of 31 healthcare professionals per session. Of all 1102 term perinatal deaths (2.3/1000) data were registered for 86% (943) and standardised anonymised audit results for 64% (707). In 53% of the cases at least one SSF was identified. Non-compliance to guidelines (35%) and deviation from usual professional care (41%) were the most frequent SSF. There was a (very) probable relation between the SSF and perinatal death for 8% of all cases. This declined over the years: from 10% (n=23) in 2010 to 5% (n=10) in 2012 (p=0.060). Simultaneously term perinatal mortality decreased from 2.3 to 2.0/1000 births (p <0.00001). Possibilities for improvement were identified in the organisation of care (35%), guidelines or usual care (19%) and in documentation (15%). More pregnancies were antepartum selected as high risk, 70% in 2010 and 84% in 2012 (p=0.0001). The perinatal audit is implemented nationwide in all obstetrical units in the Netherlands in a short time period. It is possible that the audit contributed to the decrease in term perinatal mortalit

Audit van aterme perinatale sterfte in Nederland. Een landelijk cohortonderzoek over de periode 2010-2012

Investigation of the implementation and results of the national term perinatal mortality audit. Population-based cohort study. Perinatal audits were carried out in all 90 Dutch hospitals with obstetric departments together with the surrounding midwifery practices. These audits involved cases of term perinatal mortality. Various registries were used to collect data relating to audit participation, perinatal death classification, shortcomings in care (substandard factors; SSF) and their relation to death, recommendations for quality improvement in care and antepartum risk assessment. 1,102 term perinatal deaths occurred between 2010 and 2012. 645 audit sessions took place with an average of 31 participants per session. Data were recorded for 943 cases of term perinatal death (86%), and audit results for 707 (64%). In 53% of the cases at least one SSF was identified. Non-compliance with guidelines (35%) and deviation from conventional professional care (41%) were the most common. The percentage of cases of mortality in which there was a probable relation between SSFs and death decreased from 10% (n = 23) in 2010 to 5% (n = 10) in 2012 (p = 0.060). Term perinatal mortality decreased from 2.3 to 2.0 per 1000 births (p <0.001). Possibilities for improvement were identified in the organisation of care (35%), compliance with guidelines or conventional care (19%) and in better documentation (15%). The perinatal audit was implemented over a short period of time. Term perinatal mortality in the Netherlands decreased during the period in which this study took plac