76 research outputs found

    The osteoporosis care gap in Canada

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The presence of a fragility fracture is a major risk factor for osteoporosis, and should be an indicator for osteoporosis diagnosis and therapy. However, the extent to which patients who fracture are assessed and treated for osteoporosis is not clear. METHODS: We performed a review of the literature to identify the practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over the age of 40 who experience a fragility fracture in Canada. Searches were performed in MEDLINE (1966 to January 2, 2003) and CINAHL (1982 to February 1, 2003) databases. RESULTS: There is evidence of a care gap between the occurrence of a fragility fracture and the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in Canada. The proportion of individuals with a fragility fracture who received an osteoporosis diagnostic test or physician diagnosis ranged from 1.7% to 50%. Therapies such as hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates or calcitonin were being prescribed to 5.2% to 37.5% of patients. Calcium and vitamin D supplement intake was variable, and ranged between 2.8% to 61.6% of patients. CONCLUSION: Many Canadians who experience fragility fracture are not receiving osteoporosis management for the prevention of future fractures

    A Cross-Species Analysis of a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer-Specific Osteolysis and Human Bone Metastases Using Gene Expression Profiling

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women in the United States. During the advanced stages of disease, many breast cancer patients suffer from bone metastasis. These metastases are predominantly osteolytic and develop when tumor cells interact with bone. <it>In vivo </it>models that mimic the breast cancer-specific osteolytic bone microenvironment are limited. Previously, we developed a mouse model of tumor-bone interaction in which three mouse breast cancer cell lines were implanted onto the calvaria. Analysis of tumors from this model revealed that they exhibited strong bone resorption, induction of osteoclasts and intracranial penetration at the tumor bone (TB)-interface.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this study, we identified and used a TB microenvironment-specific gene expression signature from this model to extend our understanding of the metastatic bone microenvironment in human disease and to predict potential therapeutic targets.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified a TB signature consisting of 934 genes that were commonly (among our 3 cell lines) and specifically (as compared to tumor-alone area within the bone microenvironment) up- and down-regulated >2-fold at the TB interface in our mouse osteolytic model. By comparing the TB signature with gene expression profiles from human breast metastases and an <it>in vitro </it>osteoclast model, we demonstrate that our model mimics both the human breast cancer bone microenvironment and osteoclastogenesis. Furthermore, we observed enrichment in various signaling pathways specific to the TB interface; that is, TGF-β and myeloid self-renewal pathways were activated and the Wnt pathway was inactivated. Lastly, we used the TB-signature to predict cyclopenthiazide as a potential inhibitor of the TB interface.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our mouse breast cancer model morphologically and genetically resembles the osteoclastic bone microenvironment observed in human disease. Characterization of the gene expression signature specific to the TB interface in our model revealed signaling mechanisms operative in human breast cancer metastases and predicted a therapeutic inhibitor of cancer-mediated osteolysis.</p

    Alendronate in the prevention of osteoporosis: 7-year follow-up

    No full text
    In a 3-year study followed by a 2-year open-label extension, alendronate sodium (ALN) maintained or increased bone mineral density (BMD) in 445 recently postmenopausal women with a spine BMD T-score &gt; -2. In a second 2-year extension, 84 women previously treated with either 5 or 10 mg ALN daily during the first 3 years and 5 mg ALN during the first extension (group A) were randomized to either 5 mg ALN or placebo (PBO). Another group of 59 women (group B) received 20 mg ALN during the first 2 years, PBO during year 3, and were then followed up without treatment during years 4-7. In group A, continuous ALN treatment for 7 years increased spine and trochanter BMD by 2.7-4.1 and 3.3-4.2%, respectively, while femoral neck BMD was maintained. Patients initially receiving 10 mg ALN maintained total body BMD, whereas those treated with 5 mg ALN experienced a small but significant loss after 7 years. Among women who received ALN 5 mg during years 4-7, those who had been treated with ALN 10 m

    Heterogeneity of spine bone density

    No full text

    Alendronate in Early Postmenopausal Women: Effects on Bone Mass during Long-Term Treatment and after Withdrawal 1

    No full text
    We studied the effect on bone mass of alendronate treatment for 5 yr and its withdrawal. Four hundred and forty-seven postmenopausal women with normal bone mass entered a 3-yr randomized trial followed by a 2-yr open label extension. Three hundred and eleven women completed the first 3 yr, and 263 consented to continue and completed the extension. We are reporting data from groups using the dose of alendronate currently approved for osteoporosis prevention (5 mg) or from the group in which alendronate treatment was withdrawn: 52 women received alendronate (5 mg) for 5 yr (group I), 56 received 3 yr of placebo followed by alendronate (5 mg) for 2 yr (group II), and 52 received alendronate (20 mg) for 2 yr followed by 3 yr off therapy (group III). In group I, alendronate (5 mg) increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and trochanter by 2.5-3.2% (P &lt;0.001 vs. baseline) and stabilized total body and femoral neck BMD (change vs. baseline, P = NS) over 5 yr. By the end of 5 yr, BMD was comparable at the spine, hip, and total body in groups I and III. The 3-yr decrease in BMD after withdrawal of alendronate (20 mg) in group III was 1.8-5.7% (P &lt;0.01 vs, baseline) and similar to the 3-yr decrease in BMD in group II during the initial 3 yr. In conclusion, alendronate (5 mg) for 5 yr or alendronate (20 mg) for 2 yr followed by 3 yr off therapy prevented postmenopausal bone lass. After withdrawal of alendronate (20 mg), bone loss resumed at the normal early postmenopausalrate
    corecore