An environmental risk assessment framework for enhanced oil recovery solutions from offshore oil and gas industry

Environmental risk assessments are necessary to understand the risk associated with enhanced oil recovery (EOR) solutions and to provide decision support for choosing the best technology and implementing risk-reducing measures. This study presents a review of potentially relevant environmental/ecological risk assessment (ERA) guidelines and, based on this review, proposes an initial suggestion of an ERA framework for understanding the environmental impacts from EOR solutions. We first shortlist the important elements necessary for conducting an ERA of EOR solutions from the selected guidelines. These elements are then used to build the suggested ERA framework for produced water discharges, drilling discharges and emissions to air from EOR solutions, which is the primary objective of the present study. Furthermore, the emphasis is placed on identifying the knowledge gaps that exist for conducting ERA of EOR processes. In order to link the framework with the current best environmental practices, a review of environmental policies applicable to the marine environment around the European Union (EU) was conducted. Finally, some major challenges in the application of ERA methods for novel EOR technologies, i.e. uncertainties in the ERA due to lack of data and aggregation of risk from different environmental impacts, are discussed in detail. The frameworks suggested in this study should be possible to use by relevant stakeholders to assess environmental risk from enhanced oil recovery solutions.publishedVersio

Exposure and effects of synthetic enhanced oil recovery polymers on the Norwegian Continental Shelf

Synthetic polymers are planned to be used for more efficient oil recovery from offshore oil reservoirs. Using synthetic polymers offshore may lead to these being released into the marine environment through produced water (PW) discharges, thereby causing environmental impacts in the ecosystem. In this study, we assess the impacts of discharging synthetic polymers on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). We use a numerical model called the Dose-related risk and effects assessment model (DREAM) to simulate discharges of polymers into the sea. DREAM assesses impact in terms of environmental impact factor (EIF) values of individual chemicals present in the PW. Two approaches are used: first, using a standard short-time/small-scale/near-field simulation procedure (50 by 50 km); second, using a non-standard long-term/large-scale/far-field simulation procedure (1200 by 1800 km). For the near-field simulations, the impact is assessed by estimating EIF values resulting from the discharge of 200 and 8000 kilodaltons (kDa) molecular weight fractions of Anionic Polyacrylamide (APAM) from a North Sea oil field. The results show higher EIF values for 8000 kDa compared to 200 kDa APAM. Far-field simulations are used because polymers appear to be resistant to microbial degradation and are thus expected to have long residence times in the sea. An increase in concentrations to harmful levels for aquatic species due to repeated discharges from multiple oilfields is thus possible. The results from the far-field simulations are used to establish relationships between the amount of polymer released annually and the resulting highest values of 100- and 75-percentile concentrations. The results indicate that polymers are not expected to build-up on the NCS and there is a significant margin between the expected polymer concentrations and the lowest concentrations at which toxic effects are observed. The established regression equations can be used to indicate maximum expected concentration values for future release scenarios.publishedVersio

Environmental risk assessment of inter-well partitioning tracer compounds shortlisted for the offshore oil and gas industry

Quantifying residual oil saturation (SOR) in the inter-well region of oil and gas reservoirs is key for successfully implementing EOR solutions. Partitioning inter-well tracer tests (PITTs) has become a common method for quantifying SOR. A new group of seven chemicals – pyridine, 2,3-dimethyl pyrazine, 2,6-dimethyl pyrazine, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol, 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol, and 2,6-dichlorobenzyl alcohol – have been proposed as potential partitioning tracers for quantifying SOR. Using these tracers can lead to their environmental release in the marine environment through produced water discharges, with currently limited knowledge on impacts in the marine ecosystem. The primary objective of the present study is to assess the environmental risk of discharging the tracer compounds in the marine environment. We investigated the fate and effect of these tracers in the marine environment. Biodegradability in seawater was measured to understand the fate of tracers in the marine environment. The acute toxicity of tracers was measured in terms of the percent cell viability of a rainbow trout gill cell line (RTgill-W1) and growth inhibition of the algae Skeletonema costatum. The ecotoxicological information obtained from these experiments was used in the dynamic risk and effects assessment model (DREAM) to calculate the tracers’ contribution to the environmental impact factor (EIF). The results from the DREAM simulations suggest no contribution towards EIF values from any of the tracers at the expected back-produced concentrations. Results from simulations at higher concentrations suggest that both pyrazines have the lowest environmental risk, followed by 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, and pyridine; while both chlorobenzyl alcohols show the highest environmental risk.publishedVersio

Environmental risk assessment of inter-well partitioning tracer compounds shortlisted for the offshore oil and gas industry

Quantifying residual oil saturation (SOR) in the inter-well region of oil and gas reservoirs is key for successfully implementing EOR solutions. Partitioning inter-well tracer tests (PITTs) has become a common method for quantifying SOR. A new group of seven chemicals – pyridine, 2,3-dimethyl pyrazine, 2,6-dimethyl pyrazine, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol, 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol, and 2,6-dichlorobenzyl alcohol – have been proposed as potential partitioning tracers for quantifying SOR. Using these tracers can lead to their environmental release in the marine environment through produced water discharges, with currently limited knowledge on impacts in the marine ecosystem. The primary objective of the present study is to assess the environmental risk of discharging the tracer compounds in the marine environment. We investigated the fate and effect of these tracers in the marine environment. Biodegradability in seawater was measured to understand the fate of tracers in the marine environment. The acute toxicity of tracers was measured in terms of the percent cell viability of a rainbow trout gill cell line (RTgill-W1) and growth inhibition of the algae Skeletonema costatum. The ecotoxicological information obtained from these experiments was used in the dynamic risk and effects assessment model (DREAM) to calculate the tracers’ contribution to the environmental impact factor (EIF). The results from the DREAM simulations suggest no contribution towards EIF values from any of the tracers at the expected back-produced concentrations. Results from simulations at higher concentrations suggest that both pyrazines have the lowest environmental risk, followed by 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, and pyridine; while both chlorobenzyl alcohols show the highest environmental risk