8 research outputs found
Education in mental health promotion and its impact on the participants' attitudes and perceived mental health
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although the promotion of mental health (MHP) through education and training is widely accepted, there is scarce evidence for its effectiveness in the literature from outcome studies worldwide. The present study aimed to assess the effect of a three-semester MHP educational program on the recipients' opinions towards mental illness and on their own self-assessed health.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Respondents were 78 attendees who completed the assessment battery at the first (baseline) and the last session (end) of the training course. They were primary care physicians or other professionals, or key community agents, working in the greater Athens area. The course consisted of 44 sessions (4 h each), over a 3-semester period, focusing on the principles and methods of mental health promotion, the main aspects of major psychiatric disorders, and on relevant to health skills. Assessment instruments included the Opinion about Mental Illness (OMI) scale and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean scores of three OMI factors, that is, social discrimination, social restriction and social integration, and the two GHQ-28 subscales, that is, anxiety/insomnia and social dysfunction, were significantly improved by the end of the training course.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results of this study provide evidence, with limitations, for the short-term effectiveness of the implemented educational MHP program on an adult group of recipients-key agents in their community. Because interventions for strengthening positive opinions about mental illness and enhancing self-assessed health constitute priority aims of mental health promotion, it would be beneficial to further investigate the sustainability of the observed positive changes. In addition it would be useful to examine (a) the possible interplay between the two outcome measures, that is, the effect of opinions of recipients about mental health on their perceived health, and (b) the applicability of this intervention in individuals with different sociodemographic profiles.</p
Diachronic trends of employment outcome of prevocational training in psychiatric rehabilitation
Abstract Background Although many rehabilitation programmes of prevocational training for chronic mentally ill persons living in the community have been funded, there is scarce literature about the diachronic trends of their long-term employment outcome. Thus the aim of the present study was to compare the 2-year employment outcome of three groups of chronic psychiatric outpatients, having attended similar prevocational rehabilitation programmes in different periods of time. Methods The first group (1984 to 1986) comprised 67 rehabilitees, the second (1988 to 1989) 53 rehabilitees and the third (2000 to 2001) 56 rehabilitees. The three groups were compared with regard to employment follow-up achievements and hospitalisation rates assessed at the end of the 2-year follow-up period by a constructed overall index, encompassing employment qualitative and quantitative characteristics. Results The third group compared to the first and second ones presented a worse employment outcome. No differences were found among the three groups with regard to hospitalisation rates. Conclusions There has been a decline in the employment outcome of prevocational training during the current decade. This decline can be attributed to contextual adverse factors such as unemployment, a more demanding labour market and disability allowances offered by the state (the 'benefit trap'). Moreover, the training itself may be 'old-fashioned' enough, thus providing the trainees with inadequate skills to obtain and maintain a competitive job.</p
Education in mental health promotion and its impact on the participants' attitudes and perceived mental health
Background: Although the promotion of mental health (MHP) through
education and training is widely accepted, there is scarce evidence for
its effectiveness in the literature from outcome studies worldwide. The
present study aimed to assess the effect of a three-semester MHP
educational program on the recipients’ opinions towards mental illness
and on their own self-assessed health.
Methods: Respondents were 78 attendees who completed the assessment
battery at the first (baseline) and the last session (end) of the
training course. They were primary care physicians or other
professionals, or key community agents, working in the greater Athens
area. The course consisted of 44 sessions (4 h each), over a 3-semester
period, focusing on the principles and methods of mental health
promotion, the main aspects of major psychiatric disorders, and on
relevant to health skills. Assessment instruments included the Opinion
about Mental Illness (OMI) scale and the General Health Questionnaire
(GHQ-28).
Results: The mean scores of three OMI factors, that is, social
discrimination, social restriction and social integration, and the two
GHQ-28 subscales, that is, anxiety/insomnia and social dysfunction, were
significantly improved by the end of the training course.
Conclusions: The results of this study provide evidence, with
limitations, for the short-term effectiveness of the implemented
educational MHP program on an adult group of recipients-key agents in
their community. Because interventions for strengthening positive
opinions about mental illness and enhancing self-assessed health
constitute priority aims of mental health promotion, it would be
beneficial to further investigate the sustainability of the observed
positive changes. In addition it would be useful to examine (a) the
possible interplay between the two outcome measures, that is, the effect
of opinions of recipients about mental health on their perceived health,
and (b) the applicability of this intervention in individuals with
different sociodemographic profiles
Childhood depression: a place for psychotherapy - An outcome study comparing individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and family therapy
Background Although considered clinically effective, there is little
systematic research confirming the use of Individual Psychodynamic
Psychotherapy or Family Therapy as treatments for depression in children
and young adolescents. Aims A clinical trial assessed the effectiveness
of these two forms of psychotherapy in treating moderate and severe
depression in this age group. Methods A randomised control trial was
conducted with 72 patients aged 9-15 years allocated to one of two
treatment groups. Results Significant reductions in disorder rates were
seen for both Individual Therapy and Family Therapy. A total of 74.3%
of cases were no longer clinically depressed following Individual
Therapy and 75.7% of cases were no longer clinically depressed
following Family Therapy. This included cases of Dysthymia and “Double
Depression” (co-existing Major Depressive Disorder and Dysthymia).
There was also an overall reduction in co-morbid conditions across the
study. The changes in both treatment groups were persistent and there
was ongoing improvement. At follow up six months after treatment had
ended, 100% of cases in the Individual Therapy group, and 81% of cases
in the Family Therapy group were no longer clinically depressed.
Conclusions This study provides evidence supporting the use of focused
forms of both Individual Psychodynamic Therapy and Family Therapy for
moderate to severe depression in children and young adolescents
Childhood depression. A place for psychotherapy. An outcome study comparing individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and family therapy.
Although considered clinically effective, there is little systematic research confirming the use of Individual Psychodynamic Psychotherapy or Family Therapy as treatments for depression in children and young adolescents. A clinical trial assessed the effectiveness of these two forms of psychotherapy in treating moderate and severe depression in this age group. A randomised control trial was conducted with 72 patients aged 9–15 years allocated to one of two treatment groups. Significant reductions in disorder rates were seen for both Individual Therapy and Family Therapy. A total of 74.3% of cases were no longer clinically depressed following Individual Therapy and 75.7% of cases were no longer clinically depressed following Family Therapy. This included cases of Dysthymia and “Double Depression” (co-existing Major Depressive Disorder and Dysthymia). There was also an overall reduction in co-morbid conditions across the study. The changes in both treatment groups were persistent and there was ongoing improvement. At follow up six months after treatment had ended, 100% of cases in the Individual Therapy group, and 81% of cases in the Family Therapy group were no longer clinically depressed. This study provides evidence supporting the use of focused forms of both Individual Psychodynamic Therapy and Family Therapy for moderate to severe depression in children and young adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR