Questions about Chemokine and Chemokine Receptor Antagonism in Renal Inflammation

Chemokines remain attractive therapeutic targets for modulating inflammatory diseases in all areas of medicine including acute and chronic kidney disease. Industry has launched huge programs for the development of chemokine antagonists, and clinical trials with chemokine and chemokine receptor antagonists are ongoing. However, chemokine biology remains an area of unexpected discoveries. Here we discuss a number of questions which need to be addressed to further explore the potential of chemokine antagonism in renal inflammation: Why does renal expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors not always correlate with their functional significance? Why does chemokine antagonism only partially reduce renal leukocyte counts? Will antagonist combinations be more effective in reducing renal inflammation? What are the functional roles of homeostatic chemokines and atypical, nonsignaling chemokine receptors in renal inflammation? And finally, what classes of chemokine antagonists are available to address these questions experimentally? Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Base

Renal co-morbidity in patients with rheumatic diseases

Renal co-morbidity is common in patients with rheumatic disease based on regular assessment of serum and urine parameters of renal function. When patients present with both arthritis and renal abnormalities the following questions have to be addressed. Is kidney disease a complication of rheumatic disease or its management, or are they both manifestations of a single systemic autoimmune disease? Is rheumatic disease a complication of kidney disease and its management? How do rheumatic disease and kidney disease affect each other even when they are unrelated? The present review provides an overview of how to address these questions in daily practice

Renal co-morbidity in patients with rheumatic diseases

Renal co-morbidity is common in patients with rheumatic disease based on regular assessment of serum and urine parameters of renal function. When patients present with both arthritis and renal abnormalities the following questions have to be addressed. Is kidney disease a complication of rheumatic disease or its management, or are they both manifestations of a single systemic autoimmune disease? Is rheumatic disease a complication of kidney disease and its management? How do rheumatic disease and kidney disease affect each other even when they are unrelated? The present review provides an overview of how to address these questions in daily practice

Phenotyping renal leukocyte subsets by four-color flow cytometry: Characterization of chemokine receptor expression

To investigate mechanisms of cell-mediated injury in renal inflammatory disease it is critical to determine the surface phenotype of infiltrating renal leukocyte subsets. However, the cell-specific expression of many leukocyte receptors is difficult to characterize in vivo. Here, we report a protocol based on flow cytometry that allows simultaneous characterization of surface receptor expression on different subsets of infiltrating renal leukocytes. The described technique combines an adapted method to prepare single cell suspensions from whole kidneys with subsequent four-color flow cytometry. We recently applied this technique to determine the differential expression of murine chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5 on infiltrating renal leukocyte subsets. In this article, we summarize our current findings on the validity of the method as compared with immunohistology and in situ hybridization in two murine models of nonimmune ( obstructive nephropathy) and immune-mediated ( lupus nephritis) inflammatory renal disease. Flow cytometry analysis revealed an accumulation of CCR5-, but not CCR2-positive lymphocytes in inflamed kidneys, compared to the peripheral blood. Particularly renal CD8(+) cells expressed CCR5 (79% in obstructed kidneys, 90% in lupus nephritis). In both models, infiltrating renal macrophages were positive for CCR2 and CCR5. These data corresponded to immunohistological and in situ hybridization results. They demonstrate that flow cytometric analysis of single cell suspensions prepared from inflamed kidneys is a rapid and reliable technique to characterize and quantify surface receptor expression on infiltrating renal leukocyte subsets

Genetic Testing in Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis

Purpose of review Premature intracellular activation of pancreatic zymogens leads to the initiation of pancreatitis, which in up to 25% leads to chronic tissue destruction, exocrine and endocrine organ failure, and a moderate increased risk of pancreatic cancer development. Whereas in many cases, the trigger of organ damage is identified, diagnostic workup in a significant number of patients does not reveal the underlying etiology of pancreatic inflammation. In these cases, alterations in different pancreatic susceptibility genes have been described to be directly or indirectly involved in disease development. In this review, we want to give an update on the most important pancreatitis risk genes and their impact on clinical diagnostics and risk stratification as well as possible treatment options. Recent findings Genetic testing is not routinely implemented in the diagnostic workup of acute or chronic pancreatitis, as most genetic variations are not considered causative for pancreatitis development but confer increased susceptibility and genetic testing rarely changes disease management. However, in patients with recurrent pancreatitis episodes of unknown etiology after intensive diagnostic work-up, in patients with a family history of pancreatitis, relatives of patients with hereditary pancreatitis, and patients with disease onset at young age, genetic testing and counseling is recommended. Besides well-established susceptibility genes such as PRSS1, SPINK1, CPA1, and CFTR, additional genes such as TRPV6 and rare genetic alterations in established risk genes have been recently identified which significantly contribute to the risk of pancreatitis, involving different molecular mechanisms. Summary When genetic testing is considered, we propose screening at least for PRSS1, SPINK1, CPA1, and CFTR gene variants. The emergence of next-generation sequencing methods could also render larger gene panels possible and clinically meaningful to detect rare variants with high-risk phenotypes. Here we summarize, evaluate, and convey in the form of practical recommendations the current level of knowledge with respect to definition, etiology, and genetic diagnostics of all forms of inherited pancreatitis

The role of biophysical information for the management of fallow systems.

Editado por Reinhard Lieberei, Helmut Bianchi, Vera Boehm, Christoph Reisdorff. Publicado também em GERMAN-BRAZILIAN WORKSHOP ON NEOTROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS: ARCHIEMENTS AND PROPECTS OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH, 2000, Hamburg. Program and abstracts. Hamburg: SHIFT: MADAM: WAVES, 2000. p. 104

Modification of traditional fallow system towards ecologically sound options.

Editado por Reinhard Lieberei, Helmut Bianchi, Vera Boehm, Christoph Reisdorff. Publicado também em GERMAN-BRAZILIAN WORKSHOP ON NEOTROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS: ARCHIEMENTS AND PROPECTS OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH, 2000, Hamburg. Program and abstracts. Hamburg: SHIFT: MADAM: WAVES, 2000. p. 65