Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea:comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the NoSAS (neck, obesity, snoring, age, sex) score, the STOP-Bang (snoring, tiredness, observed apneas, blood pressure, body mass index, age, neck circumference, gender) questionnaire, and the Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the oxygen desaturation index (ODI). METHODS: Data from 235 patients who were monitored by ambulant polysomnography (PSG) were retrospectively analyzed. OSA severity was classified based on the AHI; similar classification categories were made based on the ODI. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), while predictive parameters were calculated by four-grid contingency tables. RESULTS: The NoSAS score and the STOP-Bang questionnaire were both equally adequate screening tools for the AHI and the ODI with AUC ranging from 0.695 to 0.767 and 0.684 to 0.767, respectively. Both questionnaires perform better when used as a continuous variable. The ESS did not show adequate discrimination for screening for OSA (AUC ranging from 0.450 to 0.525). Male gender, age, and BMI proved to be the strongest individual predictors in this cohort. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the predictive performance of three different screening instruments with respect to both the AHI and the ODI. This is important, due to increasing evidence that the ODI may have a higher reproducibility in the clinical setting. The NoSAS score and the STOP-Bang questionnaire proved to be equally adequate to predict OSA severity based on both the AHI and the ODI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11325-020-02219-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

The Developmental Origin of the Auricula Revisited

Objectives/Hypothesis: Congenital auricular anomalies are common. Additionally, the auricle plays an important role in the staging of human embryos. However, little is known about the embryological development of the auricle. The most commonly reproduced developmental theory by His (1885) describes six hillocks; three on the first and three on the second pharyngeal arch. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of this theory by modern techniques and to expand the knowledge of the embryological development and morphology of the auricle. Study Design: 22 human embryos from the Carnegie collection between Carnegie stage 13 and 23 (28–60 days) were selected based on their histological quality. Methods: Histological sections of the selected embryos were examined. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were prepared. Additionally, literature research was performed. Results: The hillocks were absent in most stages. Contrary to common knowledge, the auricle is almost entirely innervated by branches of the facial nerve. The branches of the trigeminal nerve only innervate the tragus and the anterior external auditory meatus (EAM). Consequently, this indicates that almost the entire auricle is derived from the second pharyngeal arch, with the exception of the tragus and the anterior EAM. Conclusions: The 3D reconstructions show the anatomy and development of the auricle to be different from concepts presented in current textbooks. As a consequence, we propose that preauricular sinuses should be classified as first pharyngeal arch anomalies. Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 130:2467–2474, 2020

Upper Airway Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Long-Term Surgical Success, Respiratory Outcomes, and Patient Experience

Introduction Upper airway stimulation (UAS) with electric activation of the hypoglossal nerve has emerged as a promising treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea.Objective To retrospectively analyze objective and subjective outcome measures after long-term follow-up in obstructive sleep apnea patients receiving upper airway stimulation.Methods An observational retrospective single-center cohort study including a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea receiving upper airway stimulation.Results Twenty-five patients were included. The total median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) significantly decreased from 37.4 to 8.7 events per hour at the 12-month follow-up ( p < 0.001). The surgical success rate was 96%. Adverse events were reported by 28% of the patients.Conclusion Upper airway stimulation is an effective and safe treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure or intolerance. However, it is possible that the existing in and exclusion criteria for UAS therapy in the Netherlands have positively influenced our results