12 research outputs found

    Ethnic differences in anthropometric measurements in boys.

    No full text
    <p>Dots represent mean values, error bars represent standard error of the mean. <i>Black African/Caribbean</i> boys generally had higher mean values of all circumferences and standing height, but lower sitting/standing height ratio, at each age group as compared to <i>White</i> and <i>South Asian</i> children. An increasing trend for ethnic differences in body circumferences is evident, especially after 9 years of age. Despite its heterogeneity, the ‘<i>Other</i>’ group tend to track <i>White</i> and <i>South Asian</i> group more closely than <i>Black African/Caribbean</i> group. Similar pattern was observed in girls (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0113883#pone.0113883.s003" target="_blank">Figure S3</a>). Due to relatively small sample size >10 years old (n = 12) the estimates may be biased therefore the trend lines from 10 to 11 years old were replaced by dotted lines.</p

    Conceptual illustration for deriving the ‘best’ BIA equation.

    No full text
    <p>Calibration equations aim to describe the relationship between fat-free mass (FFM) and height<sup>2</sup>/impedance (HT<sup>2</sup>/Z) or impedance (Z). Three types of calibration equations were investigated: (i) a generic equation with no ethnic terms; (ii) a simple ethnic-specific equation (same slope, different intercept); (iii) a complex ethnic-specific equation with ethnic-impedance interaction terms (different slopes, different intercepts). Model can have very similar average residuals but the distribution of residuals may vary across ethnic groups (iv). To avoid ethnic bias, models with even residual distribution (v) are preferred.</p

    Residuals distribution for each ethnic group for model A2.

    No full text
    <p>Residuals from model A2 were regressed, for each ethnic group, on height<sup>2</sup>/impedance as indicated by the bold regression line. The shaded area represents a 95% confidence interval for the mean of residuals as a function of height<sup>2</sup>/impedance. Correlation coeffients (95% confidence interval) are also shown. No mean, and no slope, differed significantly from zero.</p

    Background characteristics of the study populations.

    No full text
    <p>Data presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise stated.</p>#<p>Height, weight and body mass index were adjusted for age and sex and expressed as z (or SD score) using British 1990 reference <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0113883#pone.0113883-Cole1" target="_blank">[31]</a>.</p><p>Background characteristics of the study populations.</p
    corecore