PORTEC-4a: International randomized trial of molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer

Background Vaginal brachytherapy is currently recommended as adjuvant treatment in patients with highintermediate risk endometrial cancer to maximize local control and has only mild side effects and no or limited impact on quality of life. However, there is still considerable overtreatment and also some undertreatment, which may be reduced by tailoring adjuvant treatment to the patients’ risk of recurrence based on molecular tumor characteristics. Primary objectives To compare the rates of vaginal recurrence in women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, treated after surgery with molecularintegrated risk profile-based recommendations for either observation, vaginal brachytherapy or external pelvic beam radiotherapy or with standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy Study hypothesis Adjuvant treatment based on a molecular-integrated risk profile provides similar local control and recurrence-free survival as current standard adjuvant brachytherapy in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, while sparing many patients the morbidity of adjuvant t

The opinion of gynecologists on the management of early-stage, high-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: There is no consensus on the management of Stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) with grade 3 histology. This study evaluates the opinion of gynecologists in The Netherlands on the management of Stage I, grade 3 EEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Working Group were requested to complete a digital questionnaire on the management of Stage I, grade 3 EEC. Actual treatment of patients with Stage I, grade 3 EEC was assessed by analysis of PALGA, the Dutch Pathology Registry. RESULTS: Most gynecologists prefer routine lymphadenectomy or complete staging (62.3%), while these were actually performed in 27.3% of the cases. Gynecologic oncologists are more likely to perform a lymphadenectomy than general gynecologists. There was a wide variation of clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The results of this study underline the need for additional research into management of Stage I, grade 3 EEC as well as the need for conclusive guidelines

In vivo dosimetry in gynecological applications-A feasibility study

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of in vivo dosimetry using microMOSFET dosimeters in patients treated with brachytherapy using two types of gynecological applicators. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, a microMOSFET was placed in an empty needle of an Utrecht Interstitial Fletcher applicator or MUPIT (Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template) applicator for independent verification of treatment delivery. Measurements were performed in 10 patients, with one to three microMOSFETs per applicator and repeated for one to four fractions, resulting in 50 in vivo measurements. Phantom measurements were used to determine characteristics of the microMOSFETs. RESULTS: Phantom measurements showed a linear relationship between dose and microMOSFET threshold voltage, and a calibration coefficient (mV/cGy) was determined. Reproducibility of repeated 50 cGy irradiations was 2% (1 standard deviation). Distance and angle dependencies were measured and correction factors were determined. Subsequently, three microMOSFETs were placed in a phantom to measure a validation plan. The difference between predicted and measured dose was less than the measurement uncertainty (+/-9%, 2 standard deviations). In vivo measurements were corrected for distance and angle dependencies. Differences between predicted and measured dose in the patients were smaller than the measurement uncertainty for the majority of the measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo dosimetry using microMOSFETs in MUPIT and Utrecht Interstitial Fletcher applicators has proved to be feasible. Reimaging should be performed after detection of differences larger than 10% between predicted and measured dose to verify the applicator configuration. Movement of the applicator relative to the target or organs at risk is undetectable with this method

Saving bladders with brachytherapy: implantation technique and results.

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: To analyze and report the treatment results of brachytherapy for solitary bladder cancer in the Arnhem Radiotherapy Institute. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1983 and October 1998, 63 patients with a solitary bladder tumor were treated with a combination of transurethral resection, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and interstitial radiotherapy. The indications for bladder-conserving treatment were tumor < or =5 cm, T1G3 (n = 14), T2G2 (n = 8), T2G3 (n = 37), and T3a (n = 4). The prescribed implant dose was either 55 Gy (range 50-65 Gy) in combination with small pelvis external beam RT, 3-4 fractions of 3.5 Gy (n = 58), or 30 Gy in combination with 20 fractions of 2 Gy external beam radiotherapy (n = 5). Brachytherapy was performed with 2-8 137Cs needles until 1995 (n = 48) and 2-5 afterloading catheters (192Ir) since 1996 (n = 15). Follow-up cystoscopies were performed at 3-month intervals during the first 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, and annually after the fifth year. The median follow-up was 4.9 years. RESULTS: Twenty patients developed local recurrences, of which 6 were "true in-implant recurrences," 12 were in second bladder locations, and 2 were urethral recurrences. All recurrences developed within 2.5 years after treatment. Of these 20 patients, 13 underwent cystectomy: 6 stayed disease-free, 1 died of postoperative complications, 2 developed regional metastases, and 4 developed distant metastases. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 80% for patients with Stage T1 and 60% for those with Stage T2 disease. The local control rate was 70% in the whole patient population and 80% after salvage cystectomy. Forty-four bladders were saved. Acute complications were seen in 14 patients, and no significant late complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Using this treatment technique, a high cure rate with conservation of the bladder and only minor toxicity can be obtained in a selected patient population having a solitary tumor < or =5 cm

An easy tool to predict survival in patients receiving radiation therapy for painful bone metastases

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: Patients with bone metastases have a widely varying survival. A reliable estimation of survival is needed for appropriate treatment strategies. Our goal was to assess the value of simple prognostic factors, namely, patient and tumor characteristics, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and patient-reported scores of pain and quality of life, to predict survival in patients with painful bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, 1157 patients were treated with radiation therapy for painful bone metastases. At randomization, physicians determined the KPS; patients rated general health on a visual analogue scale (VAS-gh), valuation of life on a verbal rating scale (VRS-vl) and pain intensity. To assess the predictive value of the variables, we used multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses and C-statistics for discriminative value. Of the final model, calibration was assessed. External validation was performed on a dataset of 934 patients who were treated with radiation therapy for vertebral metastases. RESULTS: Patients had mainly breast (39%), prostate (23%), or lung cancer (25%). After a maximum of 142 weeks' follow-up, 74% of patients had died. The best predictive model included sex, primary tumor, visceral metastases, KPS, VAS-gh, and VRS-vl (C-statistic = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.70-0.74). A reduced model, with only KPS and primary tumor, showed comparable discriminative capacity (C-statistic = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.69-0.72). External validation showed a C-statistic of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.70-0.73). Calibration of the derivation and the validation dataset showed underestimation of survival. CONCLUSION: In predicting survival in patients with painful bone metastases, KPS combined with primary tumor was comparable to a more complex model. Considering the amount of variables in complex models and the additional burden on patients, the simple model is preferred for daily use. In addition, a risk table for survival is provided

The number of metastatic sites for stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma, endometrioid cell type, is a strong negative prognostic factor

The aim of this study was to look at the impact of the number of sites with tumour involvement on outcome for patients with stage IIIA endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. Patients and methods. 141 patients stage IIIA were included. A central histopathological review was performed. Patients staged solely on the presence of a positive peritoneal washing were excluded. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 217 months with a median of 43 months. Endpoints of the study were locoregional recurrence rates, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results. In multivariate analyses the number of involved sites showed to be the only independent significant variable for DMFS, DFS, and DSS with a Hazard Ratio of 2.1, 2.2, and 2.2, respectively. The DSS was significantly related to the number of involved sites, with a 5-year DSS of 70.4% for one site, 42.8% for two sites, and 43.9% for three sites, respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusion. The number of involved sites outside the corpus uterine for stage IIIA seems to be a strong negative prognostic factor for stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio

Radiation therapy combined with hyperthermia versus cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer: Results of the randomized RADCHOC trial

Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio

Brachytherapy versus cystectomy in solitary bladder cancer: a case control, multicentre, East-Netherlands study.

Contains fulltext : 80891.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)PURPOSE: Comparing the outcome of surgery and brachytherapy-based radiotherapy in patients with solitary T1G3/T2 bladder tumour in, a retrospective case-control study, because efforts for a randomised clinical trial comparing these modalities have failed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystectomy group. Patients were selected using the pathological registration system (PALGA). 289 cases of TURT followed by cystectomy, indicated by a muscle--invading bladder tumour were performed in three East-Netherlands medical centres between 1991 and 2001. Out of this group 179 patients with clinical T2N0M0 bladder tumour were selected. All the consecutive files were analysed by a urologist and a radiation oncologist and 65 of those patients (mean age 63.7 years) would have been eligible for brachytherapy, based on an initial analysis: cystoscopy estimated tumour size, post-TURT pathological report, completed by CT-scan and/or, MRI-scan. A final pathological report after radical cystectomy was not considered for patients' selection. Brachytherapy group. Patients were selected using a prospective registration study aiming at determination of our treatment results. 89 Patients (mean age 68.4 years) underwent TURT followed by a course of external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy from 1983 till 2005 in the Arnhem Radiotherapy Institute. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the brachytherapy group was 5.7 years (range 0.2-21.4 years), for the cystectomy group was 5.05 years (range: 0.04-16.8 years). No difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) could be detected with a 5- and 10-year DSS of 71% and 66% in the brachytherapy group and 60% and 57% in the cystectomy group, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 57% in the brachytherapy group and 52% in the cystectomy group, however, the 10-year OS was better in the cystectomy than in the brachytherapy group (42% and 33%, respectively). This is caused by the significant age difference in favour of the cystectomy group. Cystectomy-free survival in the brachytherapy group was 70%. CONCLUSION: Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. However, in a selected patient population a bladder sparing treatment, i.e. a combination of transurethral tumour resection (TURT), external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy, can be applied successfully. This concerns a solitary, T1G3 or T2 bladder tumour, with a diameter<5 cm

Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts

Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio