Revising consensus in portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is associated with the most severe complications of cirrhosis, including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and bleeding from gastro-esophageal varices. Despite the progress achieved over the last decades, the 6-week mortality associated with variceal bleeding is still in the order of 10–20%. Awareness of the difficulty inherent to the evaluation of diagnostic tools and the design and conduct of good clinical trials for the treatment of portalhypertensionhas led to theorganization, since1986,of a series of consensus meetings. The first one was organized by Andrew Burroughs in Groningen, The Netherlands [1]. After Groningen, other meetings followed, in Baveno in 1990 (Baveno I) [2] and in 1995 (Baveno II) [3,4], in Milan in 1992 [5], in Reston, USA, in 1996 [6], in Stresa in 2000 (Baveno III) [7,8], again in Baveno in 2005 (Baveno IV) [9,10], and in Atlanta in 2007 [11]. The aims of these meetings were to develop definitions of key events in portal hypertension and variceal bleeding, to review the existing evidence on the natural history, the diagnosis and the therapeutic modalities of portal hypertension, and to issue evidence-based recommendations for the conduct of clinical trials and the management of patients. All these meetings were successful and produced consensus statements on some important points, although some issues remained unsettled. To continue the work of the previous meetings, a Baveno V workshop was held on May 21–22, 2010. The workshop was attended by many of the experts responsible for most of the major achievements of the last years in this field. Many of them had attended the previous meetings as well. The main fields of discussion of the Baveno V workshop were the same as in Baveno I–IV, i.e. the definitions of key events concerning the bleeding episode and the therapeutic options in patients with portal hypertension. For each of these topics, a series of consensus statements were discussed and agreed upon. As in Baveno IV, whenever applicable, the level of existing evidence was evaluated and the recommendations were ranked according to the Oxford System [12] (i.e.: level of evidence from 1 = highes

Vascular Liver Disorders, Portal Vein Thrombosis, and Procedural Bleeding in Patients With Liver Disease:2020 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

An overview of the current understanding of bleeding and thrombosis in cirrhosis. An evidence-based justification for bleeding risk assessment in patients with cirrhosis prior to invasive procedures, including current concepts in preprocedural testing and laboratory analysis and their role in predicting bleeding complications. An outline of established and recently identified risk factors for venous thrombosis in the portal and hepatic venous systems in both patients with and without cirrhosis along with thrombophilia testing recommendations

Etiology, management, and outcome of the Budd-Chiari syndrome

Background: The Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is hepatic venous outflow obstruction. What is known about the syndrome is based on small studies of prevalent cases. Objective: To characterize the causes and treatment of incident BCS. Design: Consecutive case series of patients with incident BCS, enrolled from October 2003 to October 2005 and followed until May 2006. Setting: Academic and nonacademic hospitals in France, Spain, Italy, Great Britain, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Switzerland. Patients: Persons older than 16 years with definite hepatic outflow obstruction diagnosed by imaging. Persons with hepatic outflow obstruction due to heart failure, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, cancer, or liver transplantation were excluded. Measurements: Signs and symptoms; laboratory and imaging findings; diagnosis; treatment; and overall, transplantation-free, and intervention-free survival. Results: 163 incident cases of BCS were identified. Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 0.1 to 31 months). Most patients (84%) had at least 1 thrombotic risk factor, and many (46%) had more than 1; the most common was myeloproliferative disorders (49% of 103 tested patients). Patients were mainly treated with anticoagulation (140 patients [86%]), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (56 patients [34%]), or liver transplantation (20 patients [12%]), and 80 patients (49%) were managed noninvasively. Only 3 patients underwent surgical shunting. The survival rate was 87% (95% CI, 82% to 93%) at 1 year and 82% (CI, 75% to 88%) at 2 years. Limitation: Treatment was not standardized across all centers, and data on important clinical variables were missing for some patients. Conclusion: Most patients with BCS have at least 1 thrombotic risk factor, and many have more than 1; myeloproliferative disorders are most common. One- and 2-year survival rates are good with contemporary management, which includes noninvasive therapies (anticoagulation and diuretics) and invasive techniques. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting seems to have replaced surgical shunting as the most common invasive therapeutic procedure. Primary Funding Source: Fifth Framework Programme of the European Commission

Association of the PHACTR1/EDN1 genetic locus with spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) afflicting predominantly younger to middle-aged women. Observational studies have reported a high prevalence of extracoronary vascular anomalies, especially fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and a low prevalence of coincidental cases of atherosclerosis. PHACTR1/EDN1 is a genetic risk locus for several vascular diseases, including FMD and coronary artery disease, with the putative causal noncoding variant at the rs9349379 locus acting as a potential enhancer for the endothelin-1 (EDN1) gene. Objectives: This study sought to test the association between the rs9349379 genotype and SCAD. Methods: Results from case control studies from France, United Kingdom, United States, and Australia were analyzed to test the association with SCAD risk, including age at first event, pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD), and recurrent SCAD. Results: The previously reported risk allele for FMD (rs9349379-A) was associated with a higher risk of SCAD in all studies. In a meta-analysis of 1,055 SCAD patients and 7,190 controls, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50 to 1.86) per copy of rs9349379-A. In a subset of 491 SCAD patients, the OR estimate was found to be higher for the association with SCAD in patients without FMD (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.53 to 2.33) than in SCAD cases with FMD (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.99). There was no effect of genotype on age at first event, P-SCAD, or recurrence. Conclusions: The first genetic risk factor for SCAD was identified in the largest study conducted to date for this condition. This genetic link may contribute to the clinical overlap between SCAD and FMD

High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions:quantitative and qualitative analysis

PURPOSE:To analyze the signal intensity (SI) of benign hepatocellular lesions in high-b-value diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) images and to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs) with those of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by institutional review board, with waiver of informed consent. Inclusion criteria were consecutive patients with diagnosed FNH or HCA who underwent MR imaging with a DW sequence of the liver at three b values, 0, 150, and 600 sec/mm2. The final study population included 67 patients (seven men, 60 women) with 90 hepatocellular lesions (54 FNHs, 36 HCAs). The mean ADC was compared between the lesions and the liver. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ADC for differentiating HCAs and FNHs. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of all FNHs and HCAs was significantly lower than that of the liver (P=.004). An ADC ratio below 15% was observed in 50 of 54 (93%) FNHs and in 29 of 36 (81%) HCAs. The mean ADC value of FNHs was significantly higher than that of HCAs (P<.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.760. With a cutoff value of 1.37 710(-3) mm2/sec, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating HCA from FNH were 70% and 76%, respectively. There was no significant difference in ADC values between HCA subtypes. The SI of most FNHs and HCAs (78 of 90, 87%) increased with increasing b values, whereas none showed a decrease in SI with increasing b values. When the DW MR criteria for benign and malignant liver tumors were applied, 44 of 90 (49%) lesions would have been considered malignant lesions, whereas the other lesions (46 of 90, 51%) would have been considered indeterminate. CONCLUSION: On DW MR images, benign hepatocellular lesions often show findings that suggest restricted diffusion

Understanding the Similarities and Differences between Hepatic and Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease

International audienceHepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD), alias sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, may develop as a complication of chemotherapy in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. HVOD is less frequently described after exposure to chemotherapy in the nontransplant setting and can also be a complication after ingestion of toxins, such as pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Veno-occlusive disease may also affect the lungs, and it is therefore termed pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD). Similarly, PVOD can develop after exposure to chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of solid and hematological malignancies. In addition, PVOD has also been linked to autoimmune disorders and occupational solvent exposure. Finally, the heritable form of PVOD is due to biallelic mutations of the EIF2AK4 gene. Both HVOD and PVOD share common histopathological features and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Both clinical disorders are rare complications that can appear after exposure to the common inciting trigger of chemotherapeutic agents. The present review aims to summarize the current knowledge of HVOD and PVOD and to describe both similarities as well as differences regarding both conditions

Transfusion-associated or nosocomial hepatitis G virus infection in patients undergoing surgery

International audienceBACKGROUND: Despite blood donor screening, there are still cases of transfusion-associated hepatitis. From 1988 to 1992, a prospective study was conducted on the incidence of non-A, non-B posttransfusion hepatitis (PTH). STUDY DESIGN: The present investigation was designed to determine if transfusion recipients with PTH who are negative for hepatitis C virus (HCV) were positive for hepatitis G virus (HGV). Patients admitted for surgery who had normal liver tests and no transfusions during the previous 6 months were enrolled. Alanine amino transferase levels were determined monthly for 6 months after surgery and for 1 year in the case of PTH (defined as alanine aminotranferase twice the upper limit of normal in two consecutive assays). HGV RNA and E2 antibodies were tested for in samples from transfusion recipients with or without PTH and from nontransfused patients. RESULTS: Of the 308 blood recipients who were enrolled in the study, 21 (6.8%) had PTH. HGV RNA was detected at the onset of hepatitis in 3 patients with PTH (14%), 2 of whom were also anti-HCV and HCV RNA positive. One patient developed E2 antibodies without detectable HGV RNA. Three (10.7%) of 28 recipients of an allogeneic transfusion without PTH developed HGV infection. HGV RNA was also found in two nontransfused patients, which suggests nosocomial transmission of HGV. CONCLUSION: Some cases of PTH are associated with HGV; most cases of postoperative HGV infection are not associated with liver abnormalities; and most PTH cases are not associated with known hepatotropic viruses