Functional popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: A poorly understood and often missed diagnosis that is frequently mistreated

ObjectivesFunctional popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (FPAES) is an uncommon overuse injury in young physically active adults manifest by neuromuscular symptoms (gastroc/soleus cramping, plantar paresthesias). It is commonly confused with chronic recurrent exertional compartment syndrome (CRECS). This study evaluated the diagnostic testing, mechanism of injury, and treatment differences between FPAES and CRECS.MethodsBetween 1987 and 2007, 854 patients (557 women, 297 men; mean age, 28.5 years) were surgically treated for the diagnosis of CRECS or FPAES, or both. Compartment pressures were measured in all patients who had anterior lateral or posterior superficial calf symptoms (normal pressure ≤15 mm Hg). Noninvasive stress positional plethysmography was routine. Stress positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or angiography (MRA) was performed on patients with positive plethysmography result and symptoms consistent with FPAES.ResultsOf the 854 patients, 757 (95%) had elevated compartment pressures (≥25 mm Hg), and fasciectomy was performed for CRECS under local anesthesia (anterior lateral, 508; posterior superficial, 191; distal deep posterior, 101). The result of stress plethysmography was positive in 139 (18%), but they were asymptomatic. Forty-three patients (27 women, 16 men; mean age, 26.6 years) had positive stress plethysmography, appropriate FPAES symptoms, and normal compartment pressures. MRA/MRI in all 43 demonstrated normal musculotendinous anatomy and lateral neurovascular compression with plantar flexion. Under general anesthesia, all had excision of the soleal band, with relief from symptoms. In 19 of the 43 FPAES patients (44%), CRECS releases were done before or after FPAES surgery. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 240 months.ConclusionFPAES and CRECS occur in the same population with similar symptoms but require different treatment

Effectiveness of intensive medical therapy in type B aortic dissection: A single-center experience

ObjectiveAlthough the mainstay of managing acute descending thoracic aortic dissection (ADTAD) remains medical, certain patients will require emergency surgery for complications of rupture or ischemia. This study evaluates factors that affect outcome and determines which patients previously treated surgically would have been eligible for endovascular repair.MethodsA single-institution retrospective study was conducted of patients who presented with clinical signs of ADTAD that was confirmed by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography (CT). All patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and medically managed to maintain systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg and heart rate <70 beats/min. Two treatment groups were identified: group 1 received medical treatment only; group 2 received medical treatment plus emergency surgery. Patient demographic and clinical data were correlated with 30-day group mortality and morbidity and need for emergency surgery. The MRA and CT scan images of group 2 were retrospectively reviewed to determine if currently available endovascular treatment could have been done. The Fisher exact test was used to compare between the groups, and P < .05 was considered significant.ResultsBetween 1991 and 2005, 83 patients (55 men) were treated for ADTAD. The mean age was 67 years (range, 38 to 85). Sixty-eight patients (82%) had hypertension, three (3.6%) had Marfan syndrome, and 51 (62%) were smokers. Twenty-five (32%) of the patients were receiving β-blocker therapy before the onset of their symptoms. Back pain was the most common initial symptom (72.2%). Emergency surgery was required in 19 patients (23%): 12 for rupture or impending rupture, four for mesenteric ischemia, and three for lower extremity ischemia. The need for emergency surgery was significantly higher in smokers (P = .03), in patients >70 years old (P = .035), and in patients who were not receiving β-blocker therapy before the onset of symptoms (P = .023). The combined overall morbidity rate was 33%, and the mortality rate was 9.6%. Morbidity in group 2 was 64% and significantly higher than the 23% in group 1 (P = .00227). The mortality rate was also higher in group 2 at 31.5% compared with group 1 at 1.6% (P = .0004). Factors affecting the overall mortality included age >70 years (P = .057), previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (P = .018), tobacco use (P = .039), and the presence of leg pain at initial presentation (P = .013). As determined from the review of radiologic data, 11 of 13 patients with scans available for review in group 2 could have been treated with currently available endovascular grafts.ConclusionsIntensive medical therapies are effective in preventing early mortality associated with ADTAD. Predictably, the need for emergency surgery carries a high morbidity and mortality rate. Most patients in this series requiring emergency surgery could have been candidates for endovascular therapy had it been available

Product line development: A strategy for clinical success in academic centers

This study proposes an organizational plan for healthcare delivery, which allows academic centers to identify clinical areas where cost and care efficiency can be developed without threat to service, quality, or teaching opportunitie