The Recovery of the East: Biopolitics in the Prussian Ostmark around 1900

Around 1900, ordinary Germans and politicians in Berlin regarded Germany’s Eastern frontier as economically, culturally and politically jeop-ardised and exposed to the constant threat of Polonisation. It thus seemed necessary to strengthen the functionality of the borderland and its connection with the centre. After purely economic incentives failed to achieve these objectives, doing little for the deperipherisation of the region, it became apparent that different measures were required. A territorial population policy was mobilised. Its most consistent tool was medical measures to control, support and govern the local population, and thus steer regional development. These measures were introduced to meet some concrete political requirements, but also for the ideological purpose of “Germanising” the region. By examining the emergence of the medical infrastructure in the Prussian eastern borderland, namely the Province of Posen, this article focuses on attempts of the government in Berlin to improve the peripheral economic, cultural and societal status of the borderland through the enforcement of biopolitical measures. It further links the regional inner strife to its own peripheral and unstable situation. The contribution furthermore examines local realisa-tions of ideas formulated in Berlin, their consequences and the processes that they set in motion. Local visions of the extent to which inner-German peripheralisation and inner-regional marginalisation was a disadvantage or an advantage challenged some key ideas of the German government. The case of the Province of Posen also shows that the reduction of asymmetries was not always desired and that locality, as opposed to centrality, was decisive for biopolitical de- and (re-)peripheralisation processes.Around 1900, ordinary Germans and politicians in Berlin regarded Germany’s Eastern frontier as economically, culturally and politically jeop-ardised and exposed to the constant threat of Polonisation. It thus seemed necessary to strengthen the functionality of the borderland and its connection with the centre. After purely economic incentives failed to achieve these objectives, doing little for the deperipherisation of the region, it became apparent that different measures were required. A territorial population policy was mobilised. Its most consistent tool was medical measures to control, support and govern the local population, and thus steer regional development. These measures were introduced to meet some concrete political requirements, but also for the ideological purpose of “Germanising” the region. By examining the emergence of the medical infrastructure in the Prussian eastern borderland, namely the Province of Posen, this article focuses on attempts of the government in Berlin to improve the peripheral economic, cultural and societal status of the borderland through the enforcement of biopolitical measures. It further links the regional inner strife to its own peripheral and unstable situation. The contribution furthermore examines local realisa-tions of ideas formulated in Berlin, their consequences and the processes that they set in motion. Local visions of the extent to which inner-German peripheralisation and inner-regional marginalisation was a disadvantage or an advantage challenged some key ideas of the German government. The case of the Province of Posen also shows that the reduction of asymmetries was not always desired and that locality, as opposed to centrality, was decisive for biopolitical de- and (re-)peripheralisation processes

Literarische Bildung in der Krise

Der Artikel setzt sich mit den Problemen der literarischen Bildung im Germanistikstudium auseinander, die sich aus der krisenhaften Situation an den Hochschulen ergeben, und mit möglichen Lösungswegen. Zu Beginn werden die Ziele der literarischen Bildung und die Ursachen der didaktischen Probleme besprochen. Im Hauptteil des Artikels werden Maßnahmen vorgeschlagen, die den erwähnten Schwierigkeiten entgegenwirken können. Am Beispiel der Arbeit mit Hyperfiktionen und Blogs wird am Ende aufgezeigt, wie ein moderner Literaturunterricht heutzutage gestaltet werden kann.The article presents problems of literary education in German studies, arising from the crisis situation of higher education, and the search for potential solutions. At first, it discusses the aims of literary education and the causes of educational problems. The main part of the article suggests possible remedies. Finally, it is presented how to use hyperfictions and blogs in class in order to teach literature in a modern way.  Artykuł przedstawia problemy kształcenia literackiego germanistów, wynikające z kryzysowej sytuacji szkolnictwa wyższego, oraz poszukiwania możliwych rozwiązań. Na początku przedstawiono cele kształcenia literackiego i przyczyny problemów dydaktycznych. W głównej części artykułu zaproponowano możliwe środki zaradcze. Na przykładzie zastosowania hiperfikcji i blogów na lekcji przedstawiono na koniec, jak można dziś w sposób nowoczesny nauczać literatury