Hyaluronic acid alone versus hyaluronic acid associated with adelmidrol for intra-articular treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a long-term follow-up

Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) has been used for many years for intra-articular treatment of knee osteoarthritis with satisfactory results. HA associated with Adelmidrol – an anti-neuroinflammatory compound – have been only recently introduced in orthopedic clinical practice with good preliminary results. Objective: To investigate whether HA associated with Adelmidrol provides better results than HA alone. Methods: Two cohorts of patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis were treated. Cohort 1 received 5 weekly intra-articular injections of HA during 2017 while Cohort 2, 4 weekly intra-articular injections of HA associated with Adelmidrol during 2018. The patients of the two Cohorts were assessed by WOMAC scale, SF-12 questionnaire and PGIC scale at 1 week (T0), 6 months (T1), 1 year (T2), and 2 years (T3) after the end of treatment. All the data were statistically analyzed. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: According to the WOMAC Scale Cohort 1 had higher mean scores than Cohort 2 at each follow-up time, with a statistically significant difference between the two cohorts at T3 (p<0.03) for all the WOMAC components, except for Stiffness. WOMAC Total mean score worsened statistically significantly only in Cohort 1, from T1 to T3 (T2 vs T1: p=0.0033; T3 vs T2: p=0.0007). The same happened for WOMAC Physical Function (T2 vs T1: p=0.0146; T3 vs T2: p=0.0046) and WOMAC Pain (T2 vs T1: p=0.0004; T3 vs T2: p=0.0002). WOMAC Stiffness worsened statistically significantly in Cohort 1 from T2 to T3 (T3 vs T2: p=0.0041), while in Cohort 2 no change on WOMAC scale was statistically significant at any time-point, for any components. The mean scores of the SF-12 questionnaire were better in Cohort 2 than in Cohort 1 at each follow-up time for both the Physical and the Mental components, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups for the latter, at T0 (p=0.0001). In both cohorts the mean score of the Physical component decreased from T0 to T3, but the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (p=0.25). The mean score of the Mental component slightly increased in Cohort 1 and decreased in Cohort 2, without statistically significant differences between the two groups at any time-point. PGIC showed that Cohort 2 scored significantly better than Cohort 1 at T3 (p=0.0336). Conclusions: Overall, HA associated with Adelmidrol gave better long-term results than HA alone

Conservative treatment for insertional achilles tendinopathy. platelet-rich plasma and focused shock waves. a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) represents a serious challenge for both physiatrists and surgeons. Here we analyse the results obtained by two conservative treatments [platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and focused extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT)] in physically active patients with IAT. METHODS: During two consecutive periods, 45 consecutive patients with IAT were treated with 3 sessions of ESWT (2400 impulses at 0.17-0.25 mJ/mm2 per session) (24 cases between September 2011 and July 2013) or with 2 autologous PRP injections over two weeks (21 cases between September 2013 and July 2015). All patients were evaluated at 0, 2-, 4-, 6-month follow-up after therapy. The outcome measures were VISA-A, VAS, Patient Satisfaction. RESULTS: Intra-group analysis showed a significant improvement of VISA-A and VAS scores in both groups at all time-points. No differences between groups were observed for VAS and VISA-A scores at all time-points, excepted for VISA-A at 4-months in favour of ESWT group (P=0.049). Patient satisfaction increased progressively (>70% at 6 months) and with no differences between two groups. CONCLUSION: Both ESWT and PRP therapy are effective and safe. Our study confirms the success of these conservative treatments in Achilles tendinopathy, even in the insertional one

Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Fracture Nonunions

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on the treatment of nonunions. As part of a prospective study, we included 143 patients (average age, 41.4 years) with a diagnosis of nonunion (mean, 14.1 months; range, 6-84 months). High-energy shock wave treatment was applied using electromagnetic shock wave generators. The shock waves were applied in 3-5 sessions of 2500 to 3000 impulses each given at 0.25-0.84 mJ/mm2, at intervals of 48-72 hours between sessions. A maximum of 3 cycles of treatment was given, at 3-month intervals. The patients were followed during a 12-month period until fracture healing or, in case of failure, until another therapy was adopted. Complete healing was observed in 80 of 143 cases (55.9%) at an average time of 7.6 months (range, 2-24 months). Partial healing occurred in 41 cases (28.7%) and no healing was observed in 22 cases (15.4%). Patients with trophic nonunions had a better success rate than patients with atrophic nonunions (P<.05). The results show ESWT is a safe and effective treatment for nonunions. ESWT is more effective for trophic nonunions than atrophic nonunions

Defocused Shock Wave Therapy for Chronic Soft Tissue Wounds in the Lower Limbs. A Pilot Study

Chronic soft tissue wounds of the lower limbs are debilitating, painful and often unresponsive to advanced dressing treatments. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) could represent an alternative treatment. Ten patients with chronic soft tissue wounds of the legs, unresponsive to advanced dressing treatments for more than 3&nbsp;mo, underwent three defocused ESWT sessions at 72-h intervals. In every session, the sum of 300 standard pulses&nbsp;+ 100 pulses per square centimeter was applied at 0.15&nbsp;mJ/mm2 and 4&nbsp;Hz over the edge of the wound. The wound size in square centimeters, Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool and visual analogue scale were used as outcome measures. A significant reduction in wound size and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool and visual analogue scale values from pre-treatment to 90&nbsp;d was observed. Seven of ten ulcers healed completely and nine of ten patients reported complete pain relief. Defocused ESWT represents a non-invasive, feasible strategy for difficult-to-treat soft tissue wounds of the lower limbs

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in early osteonecrosis of the femoral head: prospective clinical study with long-term follow-up

Introduction Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) may exert benefecial effects in avascular necrosis of femoral head (AVNFH). Patients The current study evaluated the effectiveness of ESWT in reducing pain and in slowing down the progression of bone damage in 36 patients with unilateral AVNFH of stage Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) I, II and III. At the beginning of the study, 10 hips were classified as stage I, 11 as stage II and 15 as stage III. Each treatment cycle included four sessions, with 2,400 impulses each administered at 0.50 mJ/mm(2), at 48-72 h intervals. Follow-up examinations were scheduled at 3, 6, 12 and then 24 months. Met hod Clinical assessments included assessment of pain scores, Harris Hip Scores and Roles and Maudsley score. Plain radiographs and magnetic resonances of the hip were used to evaluate the size of the lesion, the extent of collapse of subchondral bone, and degenerative changes of the hip joint. Results Patients from ARCO stage I group and stage II group achieved significantly better results than patients from ARCO stage III group at all follow-up time points (p < 0.005). During the follow-up period, 10 of the 15 stage III ARCO patients received an arthroplasty. ARCO stages I and II lesions were unchanged on radiographs and on magnetic resonance images. Conclusion ESWT in ARCO stages I and II may help to prevent progression of the area of avascular necrosis and manage pain

Use of low-molecular weight heparin, transfusion and mortality in COVID-19 patients not requiring ventilation

: It is still debated whether prophylactic doses of low-molecular- weight heparin (LMWH) are always effective in preventing Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality in COVID-19. Furthermore, there is paucity of data for those patients not requiring ventilation. We explored mortality and the safety/efficacy profile of LMWH in a cohort of Italian patients with COVID-19 who did not undergo ventilation. From the initial cohort of 422 patients, 264 were enrolled. Most (n = 156, 87.7%) received standard LMWH prophylaxis during hospitalization, with no significant difference between medical wards and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Major or not major but clinically relevant hemorrhages were recorded in 13 (4.9%) patients: twelve in those taking prophylactic LMWH and one in a patient taking oral anticoagulants (p: n.s.). Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) with median age 75 years.&nbsp;were transfused. Hemoglobin (Hb) at admission was significantly lower in transfused patients and Hb at admission inversely correlated with the number of red blood cells units transfused (p &lt; 0.001). In-hospital mortality occurred in 76 (28.8%) patients, 46 (24.3%) of whom admitted to medical wards. Furthermore, Hb levels at admittance were significantly lower in fatalities (g/dl 12.3; IQR 2.4 vs. 13.3; IQR 2.8; Mann-Whitney U-test; p = 0.001). After the exclusion of patients treated by LMWH intermediate or therapeutic doses (n = 32), the logistic regression showed that prophylaxis significantly and independently reduced mortality (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.85). Present data show that COVID-19 patients who do not require ventilation benefit from prophylactic doses of LMWH

Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The single-arm TOCIVID-19 prospective trial

BackgroundTocilizumab blocks pro-inflammatory activity of interleukin-6 (IL-6), involved in pathogenesis of pneumonia the most frequent cause of death in COVID-19 patients.MethodsA multicenter, single-arm, hypothesis-driven trial was planned, according to a phase 2 design, to study the effect of tocilizumab on lethality rates at 14 and 30 days (co-primary endpoints, a priori expected rates being 20 and 35%, respectively). A further prospective cohort of patients, consecutively enrolled after the first cohort was accomplished, was used as a secondary validation dataset. The two cohorts were evaluated jointly in an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model to assess prognostic variables on survival.ResultsIn the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) phase 2 population, 180/301 (59.8%) subjects received tocilizumab, and 67 deaths were observed overall. Lethality rates were equal to 18.4% (97.5% CI: 13.6-24.0, P=0.52) and 22.4% (97.5% CI: 17.2-28.3, P&lt;0.001) at 14 and 30 days, respectively. Lethality rates were lower in the validation dataset, that included 920 patients. No signal of specific drug toxicity was reported. In the exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio negatively affected survival, while the concurrent use of steroids was associated with greater survival. A statistically significant interaction was found between tocilizumab and respiratory support, suggesting that tocilizumab might be more effective in patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline.ConclusionsTocilizumab reduced lethality rate at 30 days compared with null hypothesis, without significant toxicity. Possibly, this effect could be limited to patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline.Registration EudraCT (2020-001110-38); clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04317092)