Self-Injurious Behaviors in Prisons: A Nationwide Survey of Correctional Mental Health Directors

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) by inmates has serious health, safety, operational, security and fiscal consequences. Serious incidents require a freeze in normal facility operations. Injuries that need outside medical attention create additional security risks, including potential escape attempts. The interruption of normal operations, diversion of staff, cost of outside care, and drain on medical and mental health resources all have significant fiscal consequences. This session will present the results and implications of a survey of the Mental Health Directors in all 51 state and federal prison systems on the extent of SIB by inmates, including incidence and prevalence, adverse consequences, and management. Thirty-nine of the state and federal correctional systems (77%) responded to the survey. Fewer than 2% of inmates per year engage in SIB, but in 29 85%) of systems these events occur at least weekly to more than once per day. The highest rates of occurrence of these behaviors are in maximum security and lock-down units, and most often involve inmates with Axis II disorders. Despite the seriousness of the problem, systems typically collect little, if any, data on self-injurious behaviors, and management approaches lack widespread consistency

A Call to Action: A Blueprint for Academic Health Sciences in the Era of Mass Incarceration

Over 100 million Americans have criminal records, and the U.S. incarcerates seven times more citizens than most developed countries. The burden of incarceration disproportionately affects people of color and ethnic minorities, and those living in poverty. While 95% of incarcerated people return to society, recidivism rates are high with nearly 75% arrested again within five years of release. Criminal records impede access to employment and other social services such as shelter and health care. Justice-involved people have higher rates of substance, mental health, and some chronic medical disorders than the general population; furthermore, the incarcerated population is rapidly aging. Only a minority of academic health science centers are engaged in health services research, workforce training, or correctional health care. This commentary provides rationale and a blueprint for engagement of academic health science institutions to harness their capabilities to tackle one of the country\u27s most vexing public health crises

Correctional Managed Health Care (CMHC) Annual Report July 2010 - June 2011

Correctional Managed Health Care (CMHC) provides global medical, mental health, pharmacy, and dental services at 16 CDOC facilities statewide clustered into ten functional units, at 42 CDOC-contracted halfway houses and at JDH. As of June, 2011, services were provided by 714 full-time equivalent staff (a total of 813 individuals) to a population of 18,700 individuals (17,584 incarcerated and 1,116 in halfway houses). We provide this care under a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Connecticut Department of Correction (CDOC) since November 1997

Behind bars: the compelling case for academic health centers partnering with correctional facilities

Academic health centers (AHCs), particularly those that are publicly funded institutions, have as their mission the treatment of disadvantaged populations, the training of the next generation of clinicians, and the development and dissemination of new knowledge to reduce the burden of disease and improve the health of individuals and populations. Incarcerated populations have the most prevalent and acute disease burden and health disparities in the United States, even in comparison with inner-city populations. Yet, only a small proportion of AHCs have reached out to incarcerated populations to fulfill their mission. Those AHCs that have partnered with correctional facilities have overcome concerns about the value and popularity of training behind bars ; the cost, liability, and pragmatics of caring for a medically complicated population; and the viability of correctional health research and extramural research funding. They have done so to great benefit to patients, students, and faculty. Partnering with correctional facilities to provide health care offers opportunities for AHCs to fulfill their core missions of clinical service, education, and research, while also enhancing their financial stability, to the benefit of all. In this Commentary, the authors discuss, based on their experiences, these concerns, how existing partnerships have overcome them, and the benefits of such relationships to both AHCs and correctional facilities

Relationship of anxiety, depression and alcohol use disorders to persistent high utilization and potentially problematic under-utilization of primary medical care

Psychiatric disorders in primary medical care are prevalent, frequently undetected, under-treated, and costly. Studies report that psychiatric disorders are associated with high utilization of healthcare, but the stability of high utilization has not been systematically examined. Medical records data for 500 primary care patients in Connecticut, USA, representing high and modal utilization levels were examined over a 2-year period. In multi-variate analyses, only anxiety disorders were associated with persistent high utilization of primary care, as well as with inconsistent attendance. Alcohol use disorders were inversely associated with persistent high utilization, and positively related to inconsistent attendance and low complexity services (determined by evaluation and management coding). Depression was associated with low complexity primary care services and inconsistent attendance. Anxiety disorders and mixed anxiety-depression disorders warrant attention as potential contributors to persistent high or inconsistent utilization of primary healthcare. Alcohol use disorders may be under-treated in primary care due to inconsistent attendance, few visits, and low complexity services.Outpatient healthcare utilization Psychiatry USA

A national survey of self-injurious behavior in American prisons

Objective: This study sought information about the prevalence, epidemiology, and management of self-injurious behavior by inmates in U.S. prison systems. Although self-injurious behavior has long been the source of significant challenges in correctional settings, limited research is available on this topic. Methods: Mental health directors in all 51 state and federal prison systems were invited to respond to a 30-item questionnaire available online or in hard copy. Univariate statistics were used to describe significant aspects of the national experience with self-injurious behavior, and bivariate statistics were used to examine relationships between variables. Results: Thirty-nine systems (77%) responded to the survey. Responses indicated that Conclusions: The survey responses indicated the disruptive effects of self-injurious behavior in the nation\u27s prisons, a need for better epidemiologic monitoring and data on such behavior, and the importance of developing and widely using effective interventions. The high response rate and expressed interest in follow-up projects suggest that state and federal correctional mental health directors see a need for better information and management in this area. (Psychiatric Services 62:285-290, 2011)

Paying the price: the pressing need for quality, cost, and outcomes data to improve correctional health care for older prisoners.

Despite a recent decline in the U.S. prison population, the older prisoner population is growing rapidly. U.S. prisons are constitutionally required to provide health care to prisoners. As the population ages, healthcare costs rise, states are forced to cut spending, and many correctional agencies struggle to meet this legal standard of care. Failure to meet the healthcare needs of older prisoners, who now account for nearly 10% of the prison population, can cause avoidable suffering in a medically vulnerable population and violation of the constitutional mandate for timely access to an appropriate level of care while incarcerated. Older prisoners who cannot access adequate health care in prison also affect community healthcare systems because more than 95% of prisoners are eventually released, many to urban communities where healthcare disparities are common and acute healthcare resources are overused. A lack of uniform quality and cost data has significantly hampered innovations in policy and practice to improve value in correctional health care (achieving desired health outcomes at sustainable costs). With their unique knowledge of complex chronic disease management, experts in geriatrics are positioned to help address the aging crisis in correctional health care. This article delineates the basic health, cost, and outcomes data that geriatricians and gerontologists need to respond to this crisis, identifies gaps in the available data, and anticipates barriers to data collection that, if addressed, could enable clinicians and policy-makers to evaluate and improve the value of geriatric prison health care