Evaluation de la surveillance du travail et de l'accouchement par la tenue du partogramme

NICE-BU Médecine Odontologie (060882102) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

état des lieux, en France, de la prise en charge des utérus cicatriciels

NICE-BU Médecine Odontologie (060882102) / SudocSudocFranceF

Quelle chirurgie proposer dans les cancers du sein après chimiothérapie néoadjuvante

NICE-BU Médecine Odontologie (060882102) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

A case of congenital toxoplasmosis-associated miscarriage with maternal infection four months prior to conception

International audienceBackground: We report a case of fatal congenital toxoplasmosis with maternal infection dated four months before pregnancy in the absence of any specific immunosuppressive condition.Case: Ms. D. experienced submaxillary lymphadenitis in February 2018. The medical workup performed revealed an acute T. gondii infection. She became pregnant in June 2018 while she still had adenopathy. The second obstetrical ultrasound, performed at 16 weeks of pregnancy, revealed a fetal death. The research for T. gondii by PCR was positive in the products of conception.Conclusion: Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis should be discussed in case of miscarriage with lymphadenitis. As lymph nodes in T. gondii infection could be responsible for iterative release of parasites and fetal death, symptomatic toxoplasmosis should be treated in women of childbearing age

Effectiveness and Costs of Molecular Screening and Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis to Prevent Preterm Birth: The AuTop Randomized Clinical Trial

International audienceOne of the risk factors for preterm birth (PTB) is bacterial vaginosis (BV), a common, often asymptomatic, vaginal dysbiosis. The earlier BV is diagnosed based on gestational age, the higher the risk of PTB. The effectiveness of a screen-and-treat strategy for BV during pregnancy remains a source of debate. One meta-analyses, including 5 studies and 2346 patients, showed a benefit to screen and treat using clindamycin. Another, with 21 studies and 7847 patients, did not recommend BV screening but observed reductions in preterm delivery by 50% and miscarriages by 80%. In another systematic review, with 48 studies, there was varying accuracy across conventional screening tests for BV and suggested no or inconclusive efficacy in the treatment of asymptomatic BV in the general obstetric population and in those with a history of preterm delivery. Based on these studies, French and international organizations recommend against screening for BV with conventional diagnosis tools in low-risk populations. However, molecular diagnostic tools have been shown to be more accurate in identifying vaginal microbiota than conventional tools, such as clinical diagnosis based on Amsel or Nugent criteria. Molecular tools have been shown to provide an objective, reproducible, quantitative diagnosis of BV, identifying emergent pathogen species, such as Atopobium vaginae (now known as Fannyhessea vaginae). To date, no randomized studies have been conducted to assess the impact of molecular tools on a screen-and-treat intervention to BV. The aim of this study was to assess whether a screen-and-treat intervention using a molecular diagnostic tool is cost-effective in reducing the rate of PTB. The AuTop Trial was a prospective, open-label superiority trial conducted in 19 French maternity hospitals from March 9, 2015, to December 18, 2017. Included were adult women in early pregnancy (<20 weeks of gestation), with no history of PTB or late abortion and no major risk factors for prematurity. Excluded were patients who had extrauterine pregnancy or nonprogressive pregnancy, or were treated with antibiotics a week before inclusion in the study. Women were randomly assigned 1:1 to undergo molecular screening and treatment (intervention group) or receive usual care (control group). The intervention group was asked to self-collect vaginal swabs and return them within 15 days of collection for each month until 28 weeks of gestation. If BV was detected, treatment with azithromycin (1 g repeated after 48 hours) or amoxicillin (2 g/d for 7 days) was provided within 48 hours. A molecular biology-based rapid diagnostic tool designed for point-of-care testing was developed using real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to quantify DNA levels of A. vaginae. The tool s specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predicative value of the tool were 99%, 95%, 95%, and 99%, respectively, compared with other diagnostic techniques. The control group received usual care with no systematic screening of BV. A total of 6671 women were randomly assigned 1:1 to the intervention group (n = 3333) or control group (n = 3338). At inclusion, a total of 3438 were nulliparous pregnancies, with 1671 in the intervention group and 1767 in the control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no reduction in the rate of PTB was observed between the intervention and control group (3.8% vs 4.6%, respectively; risk ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.05; P = 0.12). The average cost of intervention per woman was u20ac203.60 (US $218.00). No significant differences were observed in the total cost in the intervention group versus control group (u20ac3344.30 [US$3580.50] vs u20ac3272.90 [US $3504.10]). In addition, no evidence of superiority was observed for the intervention strategy compared with usual care. However, in the nulliparous subgroup, the number of PTBs was significantly lower in the intervention group (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.9-4.6) than the control group (5.9%, 95% CI, 4.8-7.2), and the cost was nonsignificant. In conclusion, the molecular diagnostic tool for screening and treating BV did not significantly reduce the risk of PTBs. Although no significant benefit was found in the overall population, the screen-and-treat strategy using a molecular tool was more effective than usual care in reducing PTBs among nulliparous pregnant women

Effectiveness and Costs of Molecular Screening and Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis to Prevent Preterm Birth: The AuTop Randomized Clinical Trial

International audienceImportance: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a well-known risk factor for preterm birth. Molecular diagnosis of BV is now available. Its impact in the screening and treatment of BV during pregnancy on preterm births has not been evaluated to date. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and economic effects of point-of-care quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction screen and treat for BV in low-risk pregnant women on preterm birth. Design, Setting, and Participants: The AuTop trial was a prospective, multicenter, parallel, individually randomized, open-label, superiority trial conducted in 19 French perinatal centers between March 9, 2015, and December 18, 2017. Low-risk pregnant women before 20 weeks' gestation without previous preterm births or late miscarriages were enrolled. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to November 2022. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to BV screen and treat using self-collected vaginal swabs (n = 3333) or usual care (n = 3338). BV was defined as Atopobium vaginae (Fannyhessea vaginae) load of 108 copies/mL or greater and/or Gardnerella vaginalis load of 109 copies/mL or greater, using point-of-care quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assays. The control group received usual care with no screening of BV. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall rate of preterm birth before 37 weeks' gestation and total costs were calculated in both groups. Secondary outcomes were related to treatment success as well as maternal and neonate health. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted. Results: Among 6671 randomized women (mean [SD] age, 30.6 [5.0] years; mean [SD] gestational age, 15.5 [2.8] weeks), the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary clinical and economic outcomes showed no evidence of a reduction in the rate of preterm birth and total costs with the screen and treat strategy compared with usual care. The rate of preterm birth was 3.8% (127 of 3333) in the screen and treat group and 4.6% (153 of 3338) in the control group (risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66-1.05; P =.12). On average, the cost of the intervention was 203.6 (US $218.0) per participant, and the total average cost was 3344.3 (US$3580.5) in the screen and treat group vs 3272.9 (US $3504.1) in the control group, with no significant differences being observed. In the subgroup of nulliparous women (n = 3438), screen and treat was significantly more effective than usual care (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.84; P for interaction =.003), whereas no statistical difference was found in multiparous (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.90-1.87). Conclusion and Relevance: In this clinical trial of pregnant women at low risk of preterm birth, molecular screening and treatment for BV based on A vaginae (F vaginae) and/or G vaginalis quantification did not significantly reduce preterm birth rates. Post hoc analysis suggests a benefit of screen and treat in low-risk nulliparous women, warranting further evaluation in this group

Predictive neural biomarkers of clinical response in depression:a meta-analysis of functional and structural neuroimaging studies of pharmacological and psychological therapies

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of neural predictors of response to the most commonly used, evidence based treatments in clinical practice, namely pharmacological and psychological therapies. Investigations of medication-free subjects suffering from a current major depressive episode who underwent positron emission tomography (PET) or functional or structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans prior to the initiation of treatment were reviewed. Results of 20 studies from 15 independent samples were included in the functional imaging meta-analysis and 9 studies from 6 independent samples in the structural neuroimaging meta-analysis. Regional activations with prognostic value include the well replicated finding that increased baseline activity in the anterior cingulate is predictive of a higher likelihood of improvement. As well, increased baseline activation in the insula and striatum is associated with higher likelihood of a poorer clinical response. Structural neuroimaging studies indicated that a decrease in right hippocampal volume is a statistically significant predictor of poorer treatment response. Overall, the predictive information that is measurable with brain imaging techniques is both multimodal and regionally distributed as it contains functional as well as structural correlates which encompass several brain regions within a frontostriatal–limbic network. To develop clinically relevant, prognostic markers will require high predictive accuracy at the level of the individual. Predicting clinical response will help to stratify patients and to identify at an early stage those patients who may require more intensive or combined therapies. We propose that structural and functional neuroimaging show significant potential for the development of prognostic markers of clinical response in the treatment of depression