43 research outputs found

    Age differences in moral judgment: Older adults are more deontological than younger adults

    Get PDF
    In 2 studies, an older and a younger age group morally evaluated dilemmas contrasting a deontological judgment (do not harm others) against a utilitarian judgment (do what is best for the majority). Previous research suggests that deontological moral judgments are often underpinned by affective reactions and utilitarian moral judgments by deliberative thinking. Separately, research on the psychology of aging has shown that affect plays a more prominent role in the judgments and decision making of older (vs. younger) adults. Yet age remains a largely overlooked factor in moral judgment research. Here, we therefore investigated whether older adults would make more deontological judgments on the basis of experiencing different affective reactions to moral dilemmas as compared with younger adults. Results from 2 experiments indicated that older adults made significantly more deontological moral judgments. Mediation analyses revealed that the relationship between age and making more deontological moral judgments is partly explained by older adults exhibiting significantly more negative affective reactions and having more morally idealistic beliefs as compared with younger adults

    Achieving ego integrity: Personality development in late midlife.

    Full text link
    As people progress through the lifespan and attempt to come to terms with the lives they have led and the people they have become, they confront the tension between ego integrity versus despair. According to Erik Erikson and his colleagues, this developmental stage becomes focal in old age; however, to some degree, people can be engaged in balancing and processing its tensions much earlier. This study explored precursors and correlates of ego integrity versus despair in a sample of women in late midlife---as the issues associated with this developmental stage started shifting to their central developmental concern. For this study, an implicit measure of ego integrity was developed, and all data were analyzed using this new implicit measure, as well as Ryff and Heincke's (1983) self-report measure. In cross-sectional analyses, both implicit and self-reported ego integrity correlated positively with life satisfaction. Self-reported ego integrity also correlated positively with psychological well-being and zest, and negatively with envy, whereas implicit ego integrity correlated positively with physical well-being. All relationships with self-reported ego integrity remained significant after controlling for social desirability (assessed fifteen years earlier). Furthermore, the more women had resolved their regrets earlier in midlife, the higher their self-reported ego integrity in later midlife; this relationship held within time as well. Finally, consistent with Erikson's developmental theory, women who had achieved higher levels of generativity earlier in midlife also attained higher levels of integrity in late midlife. Continuing to study the processes and outcomes associated with ego integrity versus despair, throughout the life cycle, could provide meaningful information about how people find peace within themselves that can be extended to improving society at large.Ph.D.Developmental psychologyPersonality psychologyPsychologyUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/125907/2/3224768.pd
    corecore