Comparative antimicrobial susceptibility of aerobic and facultative bacteria from community-acquired bacteremia to ertapenem in Taiwan

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ertapenem is a once-a-day carbapenem and has excellent activity against many gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic, facultative, and anaerobic bacteria. The susceptibility of isolates of community-acquired bacteremia to ertapenem has not been reported yet. The present study assesses the in vitro activity of ertapenem against aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with community-acquired bacteremia by determining and comparing the MICs of cefepime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ertapenem, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, amikacin and gentamicin. The prevalence of extended broad spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) producing strains of community-acquired bacteremia and their susceptibility to these antibiotics are investigated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Aerobic and facultative bacteria isolated from blood obtained from hospitalized patients with community-acquired bacteremia within 48 hours of admission between August 1, 2004 and September 30, 2004 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Taiwan, were identified using standard procedures. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by Etest according to the standard guidelines provided by the manufacturer and document M100-S16 Performance Standards of the Clinical Laboratory of Standard Institute. Antimicrobial agents including cefepime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ertapenem, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, amikacin and gentamicin were used against the bacterial isolates to test their MICs as determined by Etest. For <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>isolates, MICs of oxacillin were also tested by Etest to differentiate oxacillin-sensitive and oxacillin-resistant <it>S. aureus</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ertapenem was highly active in vitro against many aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens commonly recovered from patients with community-acquired bacteremia (128/159, 80.5 %). Ertapenem had more potent activity than ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, or ciprofloxacin against oxacillin-susceptible <it>S</it>. <it>aureus </it>(17/17, 100%)and was more active than any of these agents against <it>enterobacteriaceae </it>(82/82, 100%).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Based on the microbiology pattern of community-acquired bacteremia, initial empiric treatment that requires coverage of a broad spectrum of both gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria, such as ertapenem, may be justified in moderately severe cases of community-acquired bacteremia in non-immunocompromised hosts.</p

Why Are Outcomes Different for Registry Patients Enrolled Prospectively and Retrospectively? Insights from the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF).

Background: Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result. Methods and Results: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ≥1 risk factor for stroke at diagnosis of AF were recruited either retrospectively (n = 5069) or prospectively (n = 5501) from 19 countries and then followed prospectively. The retrospectively enrolled cohort comprised patients with established AF (for a least 6, and up to 24 months before enrolment), who were identified retrospectively (and baseline and partial follow-up data were collected from the emedical records) and then followed prospectively between 0-18 months (such that the total time of follow-up was 24 months; data collection Dec-2009 and Oct-2010). In the prospectively enrolled cohort, patients with newly diagnosed AF (≤6 weeks after diagnosis) were recruited between Mar-2010 and Oct-2011 and were followed for 24 months after enrolment. Differences between the cohorts were observed in clinical characteristics, including type of AF, stroke prevention strategies, and event rates. More patients in the retrospectively identified cohort received vitamin K antagonists (62.1% vs. 53.2%) and fewer received non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (1.8% vs . 4.2%). All-cause mortality rates per 100 person-years during the prospective follow-up (starting the first study visit up to 1 year) were significantly lower in the retrospective than prospectively identified cohort (3.04 [95% CI 2.51 to 3.67] vs . 4.05 [95% CI 3.53 to 4.63]; p = 0.016). Conclusions: Interpretations of data from registries that aim to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with AF must take account of differences in registry design and the impact of recall bias and survivorship bias that is incurred with retrospective enrolment. Clinical Trial Registration: - URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362)

Improved risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: an integrated GARFIELD-AF tool for the prediction of mortality, stroke and bleed in patients with and without anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an accurate, web-based tool for stratifying patients with atrial fibrillation to facilitate decisions on the potential benefits/risks of anticoagulation, based on mortality, stroke and bleeding risks. DESIGN: The new tool was developed, using stepwise regression, for all and then applied to lower risk patients. C-statistics were compared with CHA2DS2-VASc using 30-fold cross-validation to control for overfitting. External validation was undertaken in an independent dataset, Outcome Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF). PARTICIPANTS: Data from 39 898 patients enrolled in the prospective GARFIELD-AF registry provided the basis for deriving and validating an integrated risk tool to predict stroke risk, mortality and bleeding risk. RESULTS: The discriminatory value of the GARFIELD-AF risk model was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc for patients with or without anticoagulation. C-statistics (95% CI) for all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism and haemorrhagic stroke/major bleeding (treated patients) were: 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78), 0.69 (0.67 to 0.71) and 0.66 (0.62 to 0.69), respectively, for the GARFIELD-AF risk models, and 0.66 (0.64-0.67), 0.64 (0.61-0.66) and 0.64 (0.61-0.68), respectively, for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). In very low to low risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc 0 or 1 (men) and 1 or 2 (women)), the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED (for bleeding) scores offered weak discriminatory value for mortality, stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. C-statistics for the GARFIELD-AF risk tool were 0.69 (0.64 to 0.75), 0.65 (0.56 to 0.73) and 0.60 (0.47 to 0.73) for each end point, respectively, versus 0.50 (0.45 to 0.55), 0.59 (0.50 to 0.67) and 0.55 (0.53 to 0.56) for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). Upon validation in the ORBIT-AF population, C-statistics showed that the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was effective for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality using the full and simplified model for all-cause mortality: C-statistics 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77) and 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77), respectively, and for predicting for any stroke or systemic embolism over 1 year, C-statistics 0.68 (0.62 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc in predicting stroke and mortality and superior to HAS-BLED for bleeding, overall and in lower risk patients. The GARFIELD-AF tool has the potential for incorporation in routine electronic systems, and for the first time, permits simultaneous evaluation of ischaemic stroke, mortality and bleeding risks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362) and for ORBIT-AF (NCT01165710)

Two-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: results from GARFIELD-AF.

AIMS: The relationship between outcomes and time after diagnosis for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is poorly defined, especially beyond the first year. METHODS AND RESULTS: GARFIELD-AF is an ongoing, global observational study of adults with newly diagnosed NVAF. Two-year outcomes of 17 162 patients prospectively enrolled in GARFIELD-AF were analysed in light of baseline characteristics, risk profiles for stroke/systemic embolism (SE), and antithrombotic therapy. The mean (standard deviation) age was 69.8 (11.4) years, 43.8% were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.3 (1.6); 60.8% of patients were prescribed anticoagulant therapy with/without antiplatelet (AP) therapy, 27.4% AP monotherapy, and 11.8% no antithrombotic therapy. At 2-year follow-up, all-cause mortality, stroke/SE, and major bleeding had occurred at a rate (95% confidence interval) of 3.83 (3.62; 4.05), 1.25 (1.13; 1.38), and 0.70 (0.62; 0.81) per 100 person-years, respectively. Rates for all three major events were highest during the first 4 months. Congestive heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, sudden/unwitnessed death, malignancy, respiratory failure, and infection/sepsis accounted for 65% of all known causes of death and strokes for <10%. Anticoagulant treatment was associated with a 35% lower risk of death. CONCLUSION: The most frequent of the three major outcome measures was death, whose most common causes are not known to be significantly influenced by anticoagulation. This suggests that a more comprehensive approach to the management of NVAF may be needed to improve outcome. This could include, in addition to anticoagulation, interventions targeting modifiable, cause-specific risk factors for death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

Risk profiles and one-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in India: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF Registry.

BACKGROUND: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective noninterventional registry, which is providing important information on the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and 1-year outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This report describes data from Indian patients recruited in this registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 52,014 patients with newly diagnosed AF were enrolled globally; of these, 1388 patients were recruited from 26 sites within India (2012-2016). In India, the mean age was 65.8 years at diagnosis of NVAF. Hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor for AF, present in 68.5% of patients from India and in 76.3% of patients globally (P < 0.001). Diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) were prevalent in 36.2% and 28.1% of patients as compared with global prevalence of 22.2% and 21.6%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Antiplatelet therapy was the most common antithrombotic treatment in India. With increasing stroke risk, however, patients were more likely to receive oral anticoagulant therapy [mainly vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], but average international normalized ratio (INR) was lower among Indian patients [median INR value 1.6 (interquartile range {IQR}: 1.3-2.3) versus 2.3 (IQR 1.8-2.8) (P < 0.001)]. Compared with other countries, patients from India had markedly higher rates of all-cause mortality [7.68 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 6.32-9.35) vs 4.34 (4.16-4.53), P < 0.0001], while rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were lower after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared to previously published registries from India, the GARFIELD-AF registry describes clinical profiles and outcomes in Indian patients with AF of a different etiology. The registry data show that compared to the rest of the world, Indian AF patients are younger in age and have more diabetes and CAD. Patients with a higher stroke risk are more likely to receive anticoagulation therapy with VKA but are underdosed compared with the global average in the GARFIELD-AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

Cascade control of water level in two tanks system

W pracy przedstawiono układ sterowania poziomem wody w układzie dwóch zbiorników o swobodnym wypływie. Do sterowania poziomem wody w dolnym zbiorniku, zastosowany został kaskadowy układ regulacji. Dla porównania uzyskanej jakości sterowania, dodatkowo przeprowadzone zostały badania w układzie z jedną pętlą sprzężenia zwrotnego z zastosowaniem regulatora PID oraz nieliniowego regulatora z modelem wewnętrznym (NIMC). W celu przetestowania opracowanego oprogramowania w środowisku MATLAB/Simulink przeprowadzone zostały wstępne badania układów sterowania a następnie wykonano próby w układzie rzeczywistym, gdzie przygotowywane algorytmy zostały zaimplementowane w mikrokontrolerze sygnałowym TMS320F28335.The paper presents a control system of the water level in the system of two tanks with free flow. In order to solve the problem of accurate control of the water level in the lower tank cascade control system was used. In order to evaluate the results of the cascade control, additional tests were carried out in internal model and one loop PID control system . Setting of controllers were determined using the direct synthesis method. Preliminary studies of control systems were conducted in MATLAB/Simulink environment to test prepared software. Final tests were performed in a real time system, where the designed control algorithms were programmed in the digital signal processor TMS320F28335. To compare the control performance of used cascade control system

Comparison of state variable estimation methods in a double tank cascade system

W pracy przedstawiona została analiza porównawcza dokonana pomiędzy trzema obserwatorami stanu: obserwatorem liniowym Luengergera oraz dwoma filtrami Kalmana: liniowym i rozszerzonym (EKF - Extended Kalman Filter) opierająca się ocenie dokładności estymacji zmiennych stanu. Analizowany obiekt w którym estymowane są zmienne stanu, składa się z dwóch zbiorników zawieszonych kaskadowo. Rozpatrzony został przypadek w którym pomiar poziomu wody odbywa się tylko w dolnym zbiorniku, natomiast informacja o poziomie wody w górnym zbiorniku uzyskiwana jest w wyniku estymacji. Analizowane obserwatory wykorzystane zostały w układzie sterowania poziomem wody w dolnym zbiorniku przy użyciu regulatora stanu, który wymaga znajomości poziomu wody w obydwu zbiornikach. Dodatkowo dokonano porównania jakości sterowania układów regulacji z wykorzystaniem regulatora stanu w konfiguracji z wyżej wymienionymi obserwatorami oraz z użyciem regulatora PID, który wykorzystuje tylko pomiar poziomu wody w dolnym zbiorniku i nie potrzebuje obserwatora. Wstępnie przeprowadzone zostały badania symulacyjne z wykorzystaniem środowiska obliczeniowego MATLAB/Simulink. Badania docelowe wykonane zostały w układzie rzeczywistym, gdzie zaprojektowane obserwatory wraz z regulatorami zaprogramowane zostały w mikrokontrolerze sygnałowym TMS320F28335, wykorzystanym do automatycznego sterowania poziomem wody w zbiorniku dolnym.The paper presents the comparative analysis made between the linear observer and two linear Kalman filters: linear and extended Kalman filter (EKF), which is based assessment of the accuracy of estimation of state variables. The analyzed object in the estimated state variables are composed of two cascaded tanks suspended. Was examined in a case in which the measurement of the water level takes place only in the botom tank, and information about the water level in the top tank is obtained by the estimation. Observers analyzed were used in the control water level in the lower tank with the control condition, which requires the knowledge of the water level in both tanks. In addition, a comparison of the quality control using the control systems of the controller with the above configuration, observers, and using the PID controller, which uses only the measurement of the water level in the bottom tank, and does not require the observer. Pre-simulation study was carried out using the computational environment MATLAB/Simulink. The research targets were made in a real time system, where the observers designed with controls are programmed in a digital signal processor TMS320F28335, deployed to automatically control the water level in the bottom tank

The Hybrid System of Ship Control at Sea

W pracy opisano symulator umożliwiający badanie działania systemu sterowania automatycznego ruchem statku w sytuacji zagrożenia kolizją i występowania złych warunków hydrometeorologicznych. Zadaniem prezentowanego systemu jest wspomaganie decyzji nawigatora, a w przyszłości zastąpienie pracy nawigatora. Omówiono sposób wyznaczania bezpiecznej trasy przejścia statku, a także sterowania po tej trasie.The article presents a simulator for testing the operation of automatic systems controlling ship's movement in situations where a collision is a real threat, particularly in poor hydro-meteorological conditions. The goal of the presented system is to support the navigator in decision making, with possible full replacement of his work in the future. Discussed is a method of determining a safe trajectory for the ship, and controlling its movement along this trajectory