Mapping the Legal Landscape: Chinese State-Owned Companies in Australia

Australia has always relied heavily upon foreign sources of investment and financing and has in the past tended to draw mainly upon British, American and Japanese investment. In recent decades, Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have played an increasingly important role in the Australian economy with a rising level of investment taking place. Chinese SOEs have been more heavily involved in investments into larger Australian investment projects, such as in mining and infrastructure. Australia has seen an increase in the number of Chinese state-owned companies acquiring substantial domestic assets; this may continue following the ratification of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement in 2015. Although Chinese SOEs operating in foreign countries such as Australia are required to comply with local corporate governance laws and principles, they also retain their unique Chinese corporate governance values and culture which they have inherited through their parent companies and from China itself. In Australia, there has been an ongoing debate over Chinese investment, with the business community being particularly supportive of such investment. Driven largely by the business community, this debate has been relatively narrow and has not explored the likely impact of Chinese SOEs and their subsidiaries upon the shape of corporate governance in countries in which they invest. This article seeks to examine the legal contours of Chinese-controlled investment in Australia with a view to acquiring a more informed understanding of the impact of Chinese SOEs upon the Australian legal landscape

Corporate Governance for Sustainability

The current model of corporate governance needs reform. There is mounting evidence that the practices of shareholder primacy drive company directors and executives to adopt the same short time horizon as financial markets. Pressure to meet the demands of the financial markets drives stock buybacks, excessive dividends and a failure to invest in productive capabilities. The result is a ‘tragedy of the horizon’, with corporations and their shareholders failing to consider environmental, social or even their own, long-term, economic sustainability. With less than a decade left to address the threat of climate change, and with consensus emerging that businesses need to be held accountable for their contribution, it is time to act and reform corporate governance in the EU. The statement puts forward specific recommendations to clarify the obligations of company boards and directors and make corporate governance practice significantly more sustainable and focused on the long term

Making corporate governance work in China's top 100 listed companies: some threats to effective governance

Although the concept of corporate governance was only introduced into China in the late 1990s, it has grown rapidly as a topic of considerable interest in different parts of China. This has been especially so if we read the pronouncements of government bodies such as the China Securities Regulatory Commission and China’s stock exchanges

Creditor participation in insolvency proceedings - towards the adoption of international standards

Effective creditor participation in insolvency proceedings has been widely seen as an essential feature of any well-developed insolvency administration system. This notion has been expressed in different ways in national systems of insolvency law, ranging from principles such as the pari passu rule and the conduct of creditor meetings to decide matters of importance in the insolvency proceedings, to the role of insolvency representatives in such proceedings. The last decade has seen the emergence of a number of multilateral efforts to more clearly articulate insolvency norms or 'best practice' guidelines; these have included such outcomes as the Asian Development Bank’s 2000 Good Practice Standards, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund’s 2005 draft Principles for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems and the monumental 2004 UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law. The emergence of these multilateral statements has recognised the regional and global significance of insolvency laws and the role that they play in providing a foundation for a market economy. This article examines the creditor participation standards evident in this body of international best practice norms. Ultimately, it is argued that creditor participation in insolvency is an essential element in a rule of law based market economy