Self Made Xeno-pericardial Aortic Tubes to Treat Native and Aortic Graft Infections.

OBJECTIVES The most appropriate material for reconstruction of the aorta for native or graft infection remains a matter for debate. This study examines the mid-term outcome of patients and graft durability after in situ aortic reconstruction with self made bovine pericardial tube grafts. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent in situ aortic reconstruction using self made bovine pericardial tube grafts between January 2008 and December 2015 at a tertiary referral centre. Peri-operative and mid-term outcomes including mortality and re-infection were analysed at the end of January 2017. Available follow-up imaging was reviewed to assess graft durability. RESULTS Bovine pericardial aortic tube grafts were used in 35 patients (86% male) with a median age of 69 years (range 38-84) to reconstruct the ascending aorta or the aortic arch (7), the descending (7), the thoraco-abdominal (7), or the abdominal (14) aorta. Twelve patients (34%) were treated for infection of the native aorta and 23 (66%) for prosthetic graft infection. Twenty-two patients (63%) underwent emergency surgery. Thirty day mortality was 31% (n = 11). Additionally, six patients died during follow-up after a median of 33 months (range 3-70). For the remaining patients, mean follow-up was 48 months (± 26) with a mean Follow-Up Index of 0.98 ± 0.08. There were no readmissions or re-operations for re-infection or graft related complications. Follow-up imaging showed no signs of graft degeneration after a median of 15 months (range 3-68). CONCLUSIONS Surgical treatment of native and aortic graft or endograft infection remains high risk. Self made bovine pericardial tube grafts for in situ reconstruction are a promising option offering many advantages. Despite high early mortality rates, early radiological and mid-term clinical results are good. Definitive eradication of the infection seems feasible after in situ insertion of xeno-pericardial material for aortic repair

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the care of patients with acute and chronic aortic conditions

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures. METHODS Forty departments shared their data on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures between January and May 2020 and January and May 2019 in Europe, Asia and the USA. Admission rates as well as delay from onset of symptoms to referral were compared. RESULTS No differences in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures were observed between 2020 and the reference period in 2019 [incidence rates ratio (IRR): 0.96, confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.04; P = 0.39]. Also, no difference in the time interval from acute onset of symptoms to referral was recorded ( 12 h 68% in 2020, 12 h 66% in 2019 P = 0.29). Conversely, a decline of 35% in elective procedures was seen (IRR: 0.81, CI 0.76-0.87; P < 0.001) with substantial differences between countries and the most pronounced decline in Italy (-40%, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in Switzerland, an increase in the number of elective cases was observed (+35%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS There was no change in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic cases and procedures during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the case load of elective operations and procedures decreased significantly. Patients with acute aortic syndromes presented despite COVID-19 and were managed according to current guidelines. Further analysis is required to prove that deferral of elective cases had no impact on premature mortality