Tiffany : research management in voedingsonderzoek

Het Top Institute Food and Nutrition (TIFN) is een samenwerkingsverband tussen publieke en private partners dat zich bezighoudt met wetenschappelijke doorbraken in voeding en gezondheid. Het in opdracht van TIFN ontwikkelde Tiffany is een research management systeem dat ontworpen is om elk stadium van wetenschappelijk onderzoek in detail te kunnen documenteren en ontsluiten. Uitleg wordt gegeven van de mogelijkheden, de voordelen en de architectuur van Tiffan

De sinus: van meetkundige definitie naar analytisch begrip

Dit artikel beschrijft het ontwerp van een introducerende les over goniometrie voor het middelbaar onderwijs, waarbij de focus lag op de overstap van de sinus in een rechthoekige driehoek naar de sinus als functie. Aan de orde komen de motivatie voor het maken van een ontwerp van deze les, de lesdoelen en het lesontwerp, en de bevindingen bij de daadwerkelijke uitvoering ervan. Wellicht kan dit (beginnende) docenten ondersteunen in hun eigen lessen over dit onderwerp. In deze les wordt immers expliciet en uitgebreid stilgestaan bij de relatie tussen het meetkundig en analytisch begrip van de sinus, wat naar ons idee een belangrijk onderdeel van de begripsvorming is en weinig aandacht krijgt in de gebruikelijke lesmethoden. Wij hopen collega's met ons lesontwerp te stimuleren en ondersteunen om ook eens wat van het boek af te wijken en leerlingen een dieper inzicht te verschaffen in de goniometrische functies

A Bayesian Network as a tool to measure Supply Chain Resilience

Resilience frameworks and tools are generally qualitative. The Diagnostic Tool presented in this paper provides a quantitative tool in the area of supply chain resilience. It is among the first tools to quantify the complex concept of resilience. We apply the tool to a sustainable pork chain in the Netherlands. We use a Bayesian Belief Networks (BNN) approach entailing among others the composition of multiple conditional probability tables. This proofed to provide necessary transparency and structure to the concept of resilience and resilience enhancing strategies in a business context

The prognostic value of J-wave pattern for recurrence of ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation in patients with myocardial infarction

Background J-waves and fragmented QRS (fQRS) on surface ECGs have been associated with the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Whether these non-invasive parameters can also predict ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is unknown. Of interest, patients with a wide QRS-complex have been excluded from clinical studies on J-waves, although a J-wave like pattern has been described for wide QRS.Methods We retrospectively included 168 patients (67 +/- 10 years; 146 men) who underwent RFCA of post-infarct VT. J-wave pattern were defined as J-point elevation >= 0.1 mV in at least two leads irrespective of QRS width. fQRS was defined as various RSR` pattern in patients with narrow QRS and more than two R wave in those with wide QRS. The primary endpoint was VT recurrence after RFCA up to 24 months.Results J-wave pattern and fQRS were present in 27 and 28 patients, respectively. Overlap of J-wave pattern and fQRS was observed in nine. During a median follow-up of 20 (interquartile range 9-24) months, 46 (27%) patients had VT recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that both J-wave pattern and fQRS were associated with VT recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of J-wave pattern (hazard ratio [HR] 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-5.58; P = .002) and greater number of induced VT (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.15-1.45; P < .001) were the independent predictors of VT recurrence.Conclusions A J-wave pattern-but not fQRS-is independently associated with an increased risk of post-infarct VT recurrence after RFCA irrespective of QRS width. This simple non-invasive parameter may identify patients who require additional treatment.Cardiolog

Pancreatitis of biliary origin, optimal timing of cholecystectomy (PONCHO trial):Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: After an initial attack of biliary pancreatitis, cholecystectomy minimizes the risk of recurrent biliary pancreatitis and other gallstone-related complications. Guidelines advocate performing cholecystectomy within 2 to 4 weeks after discharge for mild biliary pancreatitis. During this waiting period, the patient is at risk of recurrent biliary events. In current clinical practice, surgeons usually postpone cholecystectomy for 6 weeks due to a perceived risk of a more difficult dissection in the early days following pancreatitis and for logistical reasons. We hypothesize that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy minimizes the risk of recurrent biliary pancreatitis or other complications of gallstone disease in patients with mild biliary pancreatitis without increasing the difficulty of dissection and the surgical complication rate compared with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods/Design: PONCHO is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, superiority multicenter trial. Patients are randomly allocated to undergo early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, within 72 hours after randomization, or interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 25 to 30 days after randomization. During a 30-month period, 266 patients will be enrolled from 18 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint of mortality and acute re-admissions for biliary events (that is, recurrent biliary pancreatitis, acute cholecystitis, symptomatic/obstructive choledocholithiasis requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography including cholangitis (with/without endoscopic sphincterotomy), and uncomplicated biliary colics) occurring within 6 months following randomization. Secondary endpoints include the individual endpoints of the composite endpoint, surgical and other complications, technical difficulty of cholecystectomy and costs.Discussion: The PONCHO trial is designed to show that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours) reduces the combined endpoint of mortality and re-admissions for biliary events as compared with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (between 25 and 30 days) after recovery of a first episode of mild biliary pancreatitis.</p

Fluid hydration to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in average- to high-risk patients receiving prophylactic rectal NSAIDs (FLUYT trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of ERCP and may run a severe course. Evidence suggests that vigorous periprocedural hydration can prevent PEP, but studies to date have significant methodological drawbacks. Importantly, evidence for its added value in patients already receiving prophylactic rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is lacking and the cost-effectiveness of the approach has not been investigated. We hypothesize that combination therapy of rectal NSAIDs and periprocedural hydration would significantly lower the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared to rectal NSAIDs alone in moderate- to high-risk patients undergoing ERCP. Methods: The FLUYT trial is a multicenter, parallel group, open label, superiority randomized controlled trial. A total of 826 moderate- to high-risk patients undergoing ERCP that receive prophylactic rectal NSAIDs will be randomized to a control group (no fluids or normal saline with a maximum of 1.5 mL/kg/h and 3 L/24 h) or intervention group (lactated Ringer's solution with 20 mL/kg over 60 min at start of ERCP, followed by 3 mL/kg/h for 8 h thereafter). The primary endpoint is the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Secondary endpoints include PEP severity, hydration-related complications, and cost-effectiveness. Discussion: The FLUYT trial design, including hydration schedule, fluid type, and sample size, maximize its power of identifying a potential difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence in patients receiving prophylactic rectal NSAIDs

Endoscopic Versus Surgical Step-Up Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis (ExTENSION): Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous randomized trials, including the Transluminal Endoscopic Step-Up Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Step-Up Approach in Patients With Infected Pancreatic Necrosis (TENSION) trial, demonstrated that the endoscopic step-up approach might be preferred over the surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis based on favorable short-term outcomes. We compared long-term clinical outcomes of both step-up approaches after a period of at least 5 years. METHODS: In this long-term follow-up study, we reevaluated all clinical data on 83 patients (of the originally 98 included patients) from the TENSION trial who were still alive after the initial 6-month follow-up. The primary end point, similar to the TENSION trial, was a composite of death and major complications. Secondary end points included individual major complications, pancreaticocutaneous fistula, reinterventions, pancreatic insufficiency, and quality of life. RESULTS: After a mean followup period of 7 years, the primary end point occurred in 27 patients (53%) in the endoscopy group and in 27 patients (57%) in the surgery group (risk ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.32; P = .688). Fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas were identified in the endoscopy group (8% vs 34%; RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83). After the initial 6-month follow-up, the endoscopy group needed fewer reinterventions than the surgery group (7% vs 24%; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.99). Pancreatic insufficiency and quality of life did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up, the endoscopic step-up approach was not superior to the surgical step-up approach in reducing death or major complications in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, patients assigned to the endoscopic approach developed overall fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas and needed fewer reinterventions after the initial 6-month follow-up.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic duct disruption or disconnection: an international expert survey and case vignette study

Background: Pancreatic duct disruption or disconnection is a potentially severe complication of necrotizing pancreatitis. With no existing treatment guidelines, it is unclear whether there is any consensus among experts in clinical practice. We evaluated current expert opinion regarding the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic duct disruption and disconnection in an international case vignette study. Methods: An online case vignette survey was sent to 110 international expert pancreatologists. Expert selection was based on publications in the last 5 years and/or participation in development of IAP/APA and ESGE guidelines on acute pancreatitis. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least 75% of the experts. Results: The response rate was 51% (n = 56). Forty-four experts (79%) obtained a MRI/MRCP and 52 experts (93%) measured amylase levels in percutaneous drain fluid to evaluate pancreatic duct integrity. The majority of experts favored endoscopic transluminal drainage for infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic duct disruption (84%, n = 45) or disconnection (88%, n = 43). Consensus was lacking regarding the treatment of patients with persistent percutaneous drain production, and with persistent sterile necrosis. Conclusion: This international survey of experts demonstrates that there are many areas for which no consensus existed, providing clear focus for future investigation