7 research outputs found

    The figure shows the optimal mRNA secondary structure of the RET haplotypes.

    No full text
    <p>A) Total mRNA secondary structure of the <i>RET</i> wild-type (WT) haplotype. B) Part of mRNA secondary structure of the <i>RET</i> WT haplotype. C) Part of mRNA secondary structure of the <i>RET</i> S836S haplotype (</p><p>T<u>T</u>CGT</p>). D) Part of mRNA secondary structure of the <i>RET</i> 3’UTR haplotype (<p><u>GT</u>C<u>AC</u></p>). Haplotypes generated by RNAfold program (Vienna Package).<p></p

    The minimal free energy (MFE, kcal/mol) and number of double helices (<i>N</i><sub><i>DH</i></sub>) were available in both, optimal and suboptimal structures.

    No full text
    <p>For suboptimal structures MFE and NDH are averages over 2900 samples. The variant fragment carrying the S836S and 3’UTR variants (</p><p><u>GT</u>C<u>AC</u></p> haplotype) presented greater <i>N</i><sub><i>DH</i></sub> (B,D) and lower levels of MFE (A,C) when compared to wild-type haplotype (WT, TCCGT), this fact happens in both, optimal and suboptimal structures. *These analysis included only synonymous polymorphisms.<p></p

    Immunostaining of the RET proto-oncogene in GTCAC haplotype carriers & non-carriers.

    No full text
    <p>A) Two representative slices of RET Immunostaining in a sample carrier S836S/3’UTR (</p><p><u>GT</u>C<u>AC</u></p> haplotype) (left) and non-carrier of this haplotype (right). B) Intensity of RET Immunostaining in samples with or without S836S/3’UTR (<p><u>GT</u>C<u>AC</u></p> haplotype), P = 0.054.<p></p
    corecore