On ecological conceptualizations of perceptual systems and action systems

This article examines Gibson's concept of perceptual system and Reed's concept of action system. After discussing several assumptions underlying these concepts, the ontological status of these systems is considered. It is argued that perceptual systems and action systems should be conceptualized neither as parts of an animal's body nor as softly (temporarily) assembled devices; rather, they are best understood as animals' abilities to achieve functional relationships, that is, as dispositional properties. This conceptualization entails that these systems are relatively permanent properties of the animal that are causally supported by, though not identical to, anatomical substrates. Further, it entails that it is the animal that perceives and acts, not its perceptual and action systems

Differential expression of agrin in renal basement membranes as revealed by domain-specific antibodies

We determined the specificity of two hamster monoclonal antibodies and a sheep polyclonal antiserum against heparan sulfate proteoglycan isolated from rat glomerular basement membrane. The antibodies were characterized by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on various basement membrane components and immunoprecipitation with heparan sulfate proteoglycan with or without heparitinase pre-treatment. These experiments showed that the antibodies specifically recognize approximately 150-, 105-, and 70-kDa core proteins of rat glomerular basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Recently, we showed that agrin is a major heparan sulfate proteoglycan in the glomerular basement membrane (Groffen, A. J. A., Ruegg, M. A., Dijkman, H. B. P. M., Van der Velden, T. J., Buskens, C. A., van den Born, J., Assmann, K. J. M., Monnens, L. A. H., Veerkamp, J. H., and van den Heuvel, L. P. W. J. (1998) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 46, 19-27). Therefore, we tested whether our antibodies recognize agrin. To this end, we evaluated staining of Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with constructs encoding full-length or the C-terminal half of rat agrin by analysis on a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Both hamster monoclonals and the sheep antiserum clearly stained cells transfected with the construct encoding full-length agrin, whereas wild type cells and cells transfected with the construct encoding the C-terminal part of agrin were not recognized. A panel of previously characterized monoclonals, directed against C-terminal agrin, clearly stained cells transfected with either of the constructs but not wild type cells. This indicates that both hamster monoclonals and the sheep antiserum recognize epitopes on the N- terminal half of agrin. By immunohistochemistry on rat renal tissue, we compared distribution of N-terminal agrin with that of C-terminal agrin. The monoclonal antibodies against C-terminal agrin stained almost exclusively the glomerular basement membrane, whereas the anti-N-terminal agrin antibodies recognized all renal basement membranes, including tubular basement membranes. Based on these results, we hypothesize that full-length agrin is predominantly expressed in the glomerular basement membrane, whereas in most other renal basement membranes a truncated isoform of agrin is predominantly found that misses (part of) the C terminus, which might be due to alternative splicing and/or posttranslational processing. The possible significance of this finding is discussed