Intraabdominal Cryptococcal Lymphadenitis in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Cryptococcal infection is a rare, yet well recognized complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We present a case of mesenteric and retroperitoneal cryptococcal lymphadenitis resulting in the obstruction of the stomach and proximal duodenum in a patient suffering from SLE, while recently she did not receive any immunosuppressive treatment. A 42-yr-old woman was admitted due to high fever and diffuse abdominal pain for three weeks. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed multiple conglomerated lymphadenopathies in the retroperitoneum and the mesentery resulting in luminal narrowing of the third portion of the duodenum. Cryptococcal lymphadenitis was proven by needle biopsy and she was treated with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B, followed by oral fluconazole. After fourteen-month antifungal therapies, the clinical symptoms and follow-up images improved. This case emphasize that the intrinsic immunological defects of SLE may be directly responsible for the predisposition to fungal infections

Comparative hemodynamic effects of vasopressin and norepinephrine after milrinone-induced hypotension in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgical patients

OBJECTIVE: Phosphodiesterase inhibitor is essential to the pharmacologic management of decompensated heart failure because it increases contractility and decreases afterload of right ventricle. It also improves hemodynamics and increases blood flow of the grafted internal mammary arteries and middle cerebral arteries during coronary artery bypass surgery. However, it induces vasodilation and necessitates the use of vasoconstrictors, such as norepinephrine. We hypothesized that vasopressin could recover hypotension induced by milrinone with less effect on pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) compared to norepinephrine. METHODS: Fifty patients, undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, were assigned randomly in a double-blind manner to receive either vasopressin or norepinephrine. After baseline hemodynamic measurements, a loading dose of milrinone 50 microg/kg was infused slowly for 20 min followed by continuous infusion of 0.5 microg/(kg min). Immediately after the loading dose of milrinone, hemodynamic variables were measured, and vasopressin (VP group) or norepinephrine (NE groups) was infused. After being titrated until the mean arterial pressure was increased by 20%, hemodynamic variables were measured again. RESULTS: Milrinone infusion reduced both systemic vascular resistance (SVR, 1218+/-299 dynes/cm5 vs 838+/-209 dynes/cm5, 1345+/-299 dynes/cm5 vs 1011+/-195 dynes/cm5) and PVR (95+/-34 dynes/cm5 vs 72+/-30 dynes/cm5, 119+/-85 dynes/cm5 vs 87+/-33 dynes/cm5) in the VP and NE groups, respectively. Vasopressin and norepinephrine infusion increased both SVR (838+/-209 dynes/cm5 vs 1100+/-244 dynes/cm5, 1011+/-195 dynes/cm5 vs 1446+/-681 dynes/cm5, respectively) and PVR (72+/-30 dynes/cm5 vs 84+/-18 dynes/cm5, 87+/-33 dynes/cm5 vs 139+/-97 dynes/cm5, respectively). The PRV/SVR ratio was decreased after vasopressin infusion (0.10+/-0.03 vs 0.08+/-0.03), while no changes were found after norepinephrine infusion (0.09+/-0.02 vs 0.09+/-0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the patients undergoing CABG surgery, both norepinephrine and low dose vasopressin were effective in restoring milrinone-induced decrease of SVR. However, only low-dose vasopressin decreased the PVR/SVR ratio that was increased by milrinone. Considering the importance of maintaining systemic perfusion pressure as well as reducing right heart afterload, milrinone-vasopressin may provide better hemodynamics than milrinone-norephinephrine during the management of right heart failure

Effect of lumbar flexion on the extent of epidural blockade

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of lumbar flexion on the extent of the epidural block during lumbar epidural anesthesia. METHODS: The epidural catheter was introduced at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side down. After administering a test drug (3 mL of 2% lidocaine and 15 mug of epinephrine), the patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: Group F (n = 16, lumbar spine flexed) and Group N (n = 17, lumbar spine in the neutral position). In both groups, 2% lidocaine (16 mL) mixed with sodium bicarbonate (2 mL) was administered through the epidural catheter while the patient maintained the lateral decubitus position with the lumbar spine either flexed or in the neutral position. All the patients maintained their respective positions for 5 minutes and were subsequently turned to the supine position. The pinprick block level and the degree of motor blockade were assessed every 10 minutes for 60 minutes after administering the local anesthetics. A 2-dermatomal difference in uppermost block between groups was determined to be clinically significant. RESULTS: The median difference between groups in the uppermost pinprick block level was only 1.5 dermatomes and it did not satisfy our criteria for clinical significance. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the lowermost pinprick block level and the degree of motor block. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar flexion has no clinically relevant effect on sensory spread during epidural anesthesia

Head rotation, flexion, and extension alter endotracheal tube position in adults and children

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of head rotation in adults and children on endotracheal tube (ETT) position and to confirm previous results regarding the influence of head flexion and extension on ETT position. After inducing anesthesia in 24 young adults and 22 children (aged 1-9 yr), ETTs were secured on the right corner of each of their mouths. Using a fiberoptic bronchoscope, the distance from the carina to the tip of the ETT was measured with each patient`s head and neck placed in a neutral position, flexed, extended, rotated to the right, and rotated to the left. In all patients, flexing the head resulted in the ETT moving towards the carina, and extension resulted in the tube being displaced in the opposite direction. In adults, head rotation to the right resulted in withdrawal of the ETT in all but one patient; displacement was 0.8 +/- A 0.5 cm (mean +/- A SD) (P < 0.001). Head rotation to the left resulted in the endotracheal tube being displaced in an unpredictable direction by 0.1 +/- A 0.6 cm. In children, head rotation to the right resulted in withdrawal of the ETT in all patients; displacement was 1.1 +/- A 0.6 cm (P < 0.001). Head rotation to the left also resulted in partial withdrawal in all patients; displacement measured 0.6 +/- A 0.4 cm (P < 0.001). In adult patients under general anesthesia, head rotation towards the side of ETT fixation resulted in partial withdrawal of the tube tip away from the carina, whereas head rotation to the opposite side displaced the tube in an unpredictable manner. In children, head rotation to either side resulted in withdrawal of the ETT away from the carina.Weiss M, 2005, BRIT J ANAESTH, V94, P80, DOI 10.1093/bja/aeh294Olufolabi AJ, 2004, ANAESTHESIA, V59, P1069Rost JR, 1999, PEDIATR PULM, V27, P199Sugiyama K, 1996, ANESTH ANALG, V82, P251HARTREY R, 1995, ANAESTHESIA, V50, P682YAP SJ, 1994, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V22, P586CAVO JW, 1985, LARYNGOSCOPE, V95, P1352CORMACK RS, 1984, ANAESTHESIA, V39, P1105GOODMAN LR, 1976, AM J ROENTGENOL, V127, P433CONRARDY PA, 1976, CRITICAL CARE MED, V4, P7