Impact of renal impairment on atrial fibrillation: ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and renal impairment share a bidirectional relationship with important pathophysiological interactions. We evaluated the impact of renal impairment in a contemporary cohort of patients with AF. Methods: We utilised the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry. Outcomes were analysed according to renal function by CKD-EPI equation. The primary endpoint was a composite of thromboembolism, major bleeding, acute coronary syndrome and all-cause death. Secondary endpoints were each of these separately including ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic event, intracranial haemorrhage, cardiovascular death and hospital admission. Results: A total of 9306 patients were included. The distribution of patients with no, mild, moderate and severe renal impairment at baseline were 16.9%, 49.3%, 30% and 3.8%, respectively. AF patients with impaired renal function were older, more likely to be females, had worse cardiac imaging parameters and multiple comorbidities. Among patients with an indication for anticoagulation, prescription of these agents was reduced in those with severe renal impairment, p <.001. Over 24 months, impaired renal function was associated with significantly greater incidence of the primary composite outcome and all secondary outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated an inverse relationship between eGFR and the primary outcome (HR 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01–1.14] per 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 decrease), that was most notable in patients with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 2.21 [95% CI, 1.23–3.99] compared to eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with AF suffer from concomitant renal impairment which impacts their overall management. Furthermore, renal impairment is an independent predictor of major adverse events including thromboembolism, major bleeding, acute coronary syndrome and all-cause death in patients with AF

Clinical complexity and impact of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF General Long-Term Registry

Background: Clinical complexity is increasingly prevalent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The ‘Atrial fibrillation Better Care’ (ABC) pathway approach has been proposed to streamline a more holistic and integrated approach to AF care; however, there are limited data on its usefulness among clinically complex patients. We aim to determine the impact of ABC pathway in a contemporary cohort of clinically complex AF patients. Methods: From the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry, we analysed clinically complex AF patients, defined as the presence of frailty, multimorbidity and/or polypharmacy. A K-medoids cluster analysis was performed to identify different groups of clinical complexity. The impact of an ABC-adherent approach on major outcomes was analysed through Cox-regression analyses and delay of event (DoE) analyses. Results: Among 9966 AF patients included, 8289 (83.1%) were clinically complex. Adherence to the ABC pathway in the clinically complex group reduced the risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.72, 95%CI 0.58–0.91), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; aHR: 0.68, 95%CI 0.52–0.87) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.58–0.85). Adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (aHR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.56–0.98) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.76, 95%CI 0.60–0.96) also in the high-complexity cluster; similar trends were observed for MACEs. In DoE analyses, an ABC-adherent approach resulted in significant gains in event-free survival for all the outcomes investigated in clinically complex patients. Based on absolute risk reduction at 1 year of follow-up, the number needed to treat for ABC pathway adherence was 24 for all-cause death, 31 for MACEs and 20 for the composite outcome. Conclusions: An ABC-adherent approach reduces the risk of major outcomes in clinically complex AF patients. Ensuring adherence to the ABC pathway is essential to improve clinical outcomes among clinically complex AF patients

Sex- and age-related differences in the management and outcomes of chronic heart failure: an analysis of patients from the ESC HFA EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

Aims: This study aimed to assess age- and sex-related differences in management and 1-year risk for all-cause mortality and hospitalization in chronic heart failure (HF) patients. Methods and results: Of 16 354 patients included in the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry, 9428 chronic HF patients were analysed [median age: 66 years; 28.5% women; mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 37%]. Rates of use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) were high (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: 85.7%, 88.7% and 58.8%, respectively). Crude GDMT utilization rates were lower in women than in men (all differences: P\ua0 64 0.001), and GDMT use became lower with ageing in both sexes, at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Sex was not an independent predictor of GDMT prescription; however, age >75 years was a significant predictor of GDMT underutilization. Rates of all-cause mortality were lower in women than in men (7.1% vs. 8.7%; P\ua0=\ua00.015), as were rates of all-cause hospitalization (21.9% vs. 27.3%; P\ua075 years. Conclusions: There was a decline in GDMT use with advanced age in both sexes. Sex was not an independent predictor of GDMT or adverse outcomes. However, age >75 years independently predicted lower GDMT use and higher all-cause mortality in patients with LVEF 6445%

Association between loop diuretic dose changes and outcomes in chronic heart failure: observations from the ESC-EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

[Abstract] Aims. Guidelines recommend down-titration of loop diuretics (LD) once euvolaemia is achieved. In outpatients with heart failure (HF), we investigated LD dose changes in daily cardiology practice, agreement with guideline recommendations, predictors of successful LD down-titration and association between dose changes and outcomes. Methods and results. We included 8130 HF patients from the ESC-EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Among patients who had dose decreased, successful decrease was defined as the decrease not followed by death, HF hospitalization, New York Heart Association class deterioration, or subsequent increase in LD dose. Mean age was 66±13 years, 71% men, 62% HF with reduced ejection fraction, 19% HF with mid-range ejection fraction, 19% HF with preserved ejection fraction. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] LD dose was 40 (25–80) mg. LD dose was increased in 16%, decreased in 8.3% and unchanged in 76%. Median (IQR) follow-up was 372 (363–419) days. Diuretic dose increase (vs. no change) was associated with HF death [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–2.08; P = 0.008] and nominally with cardiovascular death (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96–1.63; P = 0.103). Decrease of diuretic dose (vs. no change) was associated with nominally lower HF (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33–1.07; P = 0.083) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.62 95% CI 0.38–1.00; P = 0.052). Among patients who had LD dose decreased, systolic blood pressure [odds ratio (OR) 1.11 per 10 mmHg increase, 95% CI 1.01–1.22; P = 0.032], and absence of (i) sleep apnoea (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.69; P = 0.008), (ii) peripheral congestion (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29–0.80; P = 0.005), and (iii) moderate/severe mitral regurgitation (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.87; P = 0.008) were independently associated with successful decrease. Conclusion. Diuretic dose was unchanged in 76% and decreased in 8.3% of outpatients with chronic HF. LD dose increase was associated with worse outcomes, while the LD dose decrease group showed a trend for better outcomes compared with the no-change group. Higher systolic blood pressure, and absence of (i) sleep apnoea, (ii) peripheral congestion, and (iii) moderate/severe mitral regurgitation were independently associated with successful dose decrease

Impact of clinical phenotypes on management and outcomes in European atrial fibrillation patients: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF (EORP-AF) General Long-Term Registry

Background: Epidemiological studies in atrial fibrillation (AF) illustrate that clinical complexity increase the risk of major adverse outcomes. We aimed to describe European AF patients\u2019 clinical phenotypes and analyse the differential clinical course. Methods: We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis based on Ward\u2019s Method and Squared Euclidean Distance using 22 clinical binary variables, identifying the optimal number of clusters. We investigated differences in clinical management, use of healthcare resources and outcomes in a cohort of European AF patients from a Europe-wide observational registry. Results: A total of 9363 were available for this analysis. We identified three clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 3634; 38.8%) characterized by older patients and prevalent non-cardiac comorbidities; Cluster 2 (n = 2774; 29.6%) characterized by younger patients with low prevalence of comorbidities; Cluster 3 (n = 2955;31.6%) characterized by patients\u2019 prevalent cardiovascular risk factors/comorbidities. Over a mean follow-up of 22.5 months, Cluster 3 had the highest rate of cardiovascular events, all-cause death, and the composite outcome (combining the previous two) compared to Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 (all P <.001). An adjusted Cox regression showed that compared to Cluster 2, Cluster 3 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27\u20133.62; HR 3.42, 95%CI 2.72\u20134.31; HR 2.79, 95%CI 2.32\u20133.35), and Cluster 1 (HR 1.88, 95%CI 1.48\u20132.38; HR 2.50, 95%CI 1.98\u20133.15; HR 2.09, 95%CI 1.74\u20132.51) reported a higher risk for the three outcomes respectively. Conclusions: In European AF patients, three main clusters were identified, differentiated by differential presence of comorbidities. Both non-cardiac and cardiac comorbidities clusters were found to be associated with an increased risk of major adverse outcomes

Performance of Prognostic Risk Scores in Chronic Heart Failure Patients Enrolled in the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

Objectives: This study compared the performance of major heart failure (HF) risk models in predicting mortality and examined their utilization using data from a contemporary multinational registry. Background: Several prognostic risk scores have been developed for ambulatory HF patients, but their precision is still inadequate and their use limited. Methods: This registry enrolled patients with HF seen in participating European centers between May 2011 and April 2013. The following scores designed to estimate 1- to 2-year all-cause mortality were calculated in each participant: CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality), GISSI-HF (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico-Heart Failure), MAGGIC (Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure), and SHFM (Seattle Heart Failure Model). Patients with hospitalized HF (n = 6,920) and ambulatory HF patients missing any variable needed to estimate each score (n = 3,267) were excluded, leaving a final sample of 6,161 patients. Results: At 1-year follow-up, 5,653 of 6,161 patients (91.8%) were alive. The observed-to-predicted survival ratios (CHARM: 1.10, GISSI-HF: 1.08, MAGGIC: 1.03, and SHFM: 0.98) suggested some overestimation of mortality by all scores except the SHFM. Overprediction occurred steadily across levels of risk using both the CHARM and the GISSI-HF, whereas the SHFM underpredicted mortality in all risk groups except the highest. The MAGGIC showed the best overall accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.743), similar to the GISSI-HF (AUC = 0.739; p = 0.419) but better than the CHARM (AUC = 0.729; p = 0.068) and particularly better than the SHFM (AUC = 0.714; p = 0.018). Less than 1% of patients received a prognostic estimate from their enrolling physician. Conclusions: Performance of prognostic risk scores is still limited and physicians are reluctant to use them in daily practice. The need for contemporary, more precise prognostic tools should be considered

Clinical utility and prognostic implications of the novel 4S-AF scheme to characterize and evaluate patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry

Aims: The 4S-AF classification scheme comprises of four domains: stroke risk (St), symptoms (Sy), severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden (Sb), and substrate (Su). We sought to examine the implementation of the 4S-AF scheme in the EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry and compare outcomes in AF patients according to the 4S-AF-led decision-making process. Methods and results: Atrial fibrillation patients from 250 centres across 27 European countries were included. A 4S-AF score was calculated as the sum of each domain with a maximum score of 9. Of 6321 patients, 8.4% had low (St), 47.5% EHRA I (Sy), 40.5% newly diagnosed or paroxysmal AF (Sb), and 5.1% no cardiovascular risk factors or left atrial enlargement (Su). Median follow-up was 24 months. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were (St) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 8.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60-25.9], (Sb) (aHR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08-1.35), and (Su) (aHR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14-1.41). For CV mortality and any thromboembolic event, only (Su) (aHR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.45-2.06) and (Sy) (aHR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.66) were statistically significant, respectively. None of the domains were independently linked to ischaemic stroke or major bleeding. Higher 4S-AF score was related to a significant increase in all-cause mortality, CV mortality, any thromboembolic event, and ischaemic stroke but not major bleeding. Treatment of all 4S-AF domains was associated with an independent decrease in all-cause mortality (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.92). For each 4S-AF domain left untreated, the risk of all-cause mortality increased substantially (aHR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.16-1.56). Conclusion: Implementation of the novel 4S-AF scheme is feasible, and treatment decisions based on this scheme improve mortality rates in AF

Impact of malignancy on outcomes in European patients with atrial fibrillation: A report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational research programme in atrial fibrillation general long-term registry

Background: The management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and malignancy is challenging given the paucity of evidence supporting their appropriate clinical management. Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of patients with active or prior malignancy in a contemporary cohort of European AF patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in the EURObservational Research Programme in AF General Long-Term Registry were categorized into 3 categories: No Malignancy (NoMal), Prior Malignancy (PriorMal) and Active Malignancy (ActiveMal). The primary outcomes were all-cause death and the composite outcome MACE. Results: A total of 10 383 patients were analysed. Of these, 9597 (92.4%) were NoMal patients, 577 (5.6%) PriorMal and 209 (2%) ActiveMal. Lack of any antithrombotic treatment was more prevalent in ActiveMal patients (12.4%) as compared to other groups (5.0% vs 6.3% for PriorMal and NoMal, p <.001). After a median follow-up of 730 days, there were 982 (9.5%) deaths and 950 (9.7%) MACE events. ActiveMal was independently associated with a higher risk for all-cause death (HR 2.90, 95% CI 2.23–3.76) and MACE (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.03–2.31), as well as any haemorrhagic events and major bleeding (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.49–3.91 and OR 4.18, 95% CI 2.49–7.01, respectively). Use of oral anticoagulants was not significantly associated with a higher risk for all-cause death or bleeding in ActiveMal patients. Conclusions: In a large contemporary cohort of AF patients, active malignancy was independently associated with all-cause death, MACE and haemorrhagic events. Use of anticoagulants was not associated with a higher risk of all-cause death in patients with active malignancies

Epidemiology and impact of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe

Background: Frailty is a medical syndrome characterised by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors. Data regarding the relationship between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) are still inconsistent. Objectives: We aim to perform a comprehensive evaluation of frailty in a large European cohort of AF patients. Methods: A 40-item frailty index (FI) was built according to the accumulation of deficits model in the AF patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Association of baseline characteristics, clinical management, quality of life, healthcare resources use and risk of outcomes with frailty was examined. Results: Among 10,177 patients [mean age (standard deviation) 69.0 (11.4) years, 4,103 (40.3%) females], 6,066 (59.6%) were pre-frail and 2,172 (21.3%) were frail, whereas only 1,939 (19.1%) were considered robust. Baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risks were independently associated with increasing FI. Frail patients with AF were less likely to be treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.89), especially with non-vitamin K antagonist OACs and managed with a rhythm control strategy, compared with robust patients. Increasing frailty was associated with a higher risk for all outcomes examined, with a non-linear exponential relationship. The use of OAC was associated with a lower risk of outcomes, except in patients with very/extremely high frailty. Conclusions: In this large cohort of AF patients, there was a high burden of frailty, influencing clinical management and risk of adverse outcomes. The clinical benefit of OAC is maintained in patients with high frailty, but not in very high/extremely frail ones

Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status – impact of the clinical classification on in-hospital and long-term outcomes; insights from the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

none614siAims: Classification of acute heart failure (AHF) patients into four clinical profiles defined by evidence of congestion and perfusion is advocated by the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)guidelines. Based on the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry, we compared differences in baseline characteristics, in-hospital management and outcomes among congestion/perfusion profiles using this classification. Methods and results: We included 7865 AHF patients classified at admission as: ‘dry-warm’ (9.9%), ‘wet-warm’ (69.9%), ‘wet-cold’ (19.8%) and ‘dry-cold’ (0.4%). These groups differed significantly in terms of baseline characteristics, in-hospital management and outcomes. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% in ‘dry-warm’, 3.8% in ‘wet-warm’, 9.1% in ‘dry-cold’ and 12.1% in ‘wet-cold’ patients. Based on clinical classification at admission, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality were: ‘wet-warm’ vs. ‘dry-warm’ 1.78 (1.43–2.21) and ‘wet-cold’ vs. ‘wet-warm’ 1.33 (1.19–1.48). For profiles resulting from discharge classification, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality were: ‘wet-warm’ vs. ‘dry-warm’ 1.46 (1.31–1.63) and ‘wet-cold’ vs. ‘wet-warm’ 2.20 (1.89–2.56). Among patients discharged alive, 30.9% had residual congestion, and these patients had higher 1-year mortality compared to patients discharged without congestion (28.0 vs. 18.5%). Tricuspid regurgitation, diabetes, anaemia and high New York Heart Association class were independently associated with higher risk of congestion at discharge, while beta-blockers at admission, de novo heart failure, or any cardiovascular procedure during hospitalization were associated with lower risk of residual congestion. Conclusion: Classification based on congestion/perfusion status provides clinically relevant information at hospital admission and discharge. A better understanding of the clinical course of the two entities could play an important role towards the implementation of targeted strategies that may improve outcomes.noneChioncel O.; Mebazaa A.; Maggioni A.P.; Harjola V.-P.; Rosano G.; Laroche C.; Piepoli M.F.; Crespo-Leiro M.G.; Lainscak M.; Ponikowski P.; Filippatos G.; Ruschitzka F.; Seferovic P.; Coats A.J.S.; Lund L.H.; Auer J.; Ablasser K.; Fruhwald F.; Dolze T.; Brandner K.; Gstrein S.; Poelzl G.; Moertl D.; Reiter S.; Podczeck-Schweighofer A.; Muslibegovic A.; Vasilj M.; Fazlibegovic E.; Cesko M.; Zelenika D.; Palic B.; Pravdic D.; Cuk D.; Vitlianova K.; Katova T.; Velikov T.; Kurteva T.; Gatzov P.; Kamenova D.; Antova M.; Sirakova V.; Krejci J.; Mikolaskova M.; Spinar J.; Krupicka J.; Malek F.; Hegarova M.; Lazarova M.; Monhart Z.; Hassanein M.; Sobhy M.; El Messiry F.; El Shazly A.H.; Elrakshy Y.; Youssef A.; Moneim A.A.; Noamany M.; Reda A.; Dayem T.K.A.; Farag N.; Halawa S.I.; Hamid M.A.; Said K.; Saleh A.; Ebeid H.; Hanna R.; Aziz R.; Louis O.; Enen M.A.; Ibrahim B.S.; Nasr G.; Elbahry A.; Sobhy H.; Ashmawy M.; Gouda M.; Aboleineen W.; Bernard Y.; Luporsi P.; Meneveau N.; Pillot M.; Morel M.; Seronde M.-F.; Schiele F.; Briand F.; Delahaye F.; Damy T.; Eicher J.-C.; de Groote P.; Fertin M.; Lamblin N.; Isnard R.; Lefol C.; Thevenin S.; Hagege A.; Jondeau G.; Logeart D.; Le Marcis V.; Ly J.-F.; Coisne D.; Lequeux B.; Le Moal V.; Mascle S.; Lotton P.; Behar N.; Donal E.; Thebault C.; Ridard C.; Reynaud A.; Basquin A.; Bauer F.; Codjia R.; Galinier M.; Tourikis P.; Stavroula M.; Tousoulis D.; Stefanadis C.; Chrysohoou C.; Kotrogiannis I.; Matzaraki V.; Dimitroula T.; Karavidas A.; Tsitsinakis G.; Kapelios C.; Nanas J.; Kampouri H.; Nana E.; Kaldara E.; Eugenidou A.; Vardas P.; Saloustros I.; Patrianakos A.; Tsaknakis T.; Evangelou S.; Nikoloulis N.; Tziourganou H.; Tsaroucha A.; Papadopoulou A.; Douras A.; Polgar L.; Merkely B.; Kosztin A.; Nyolczas N.; Nagy A.C.; Halmosi R.; Elber J.; Alony I.; Shotan A.; Fuhrmann A.V.; Amir O.; Romano S.; Marcon S.; Penco M.; Di Mauro M.; Lemme E.; Carubelli V.; Rovetta R.; Metra M.; Bulgari M.; Quinzani F.; Lombardi C.; Bosi S.; Schiavina G.; Squeri A.; Barbieri A.; Di Tano G.; Pirelli S.; Ferrari R.; Fucili A.; Passero T.; Musio S.; Di Biase M.; Correale M.; Salvemini G.; Brognoli S.; Zanelli E.; Giordano A.; Agostoni P.; Italiano G.; Salvioni E.; Copelli S.; Modena M.G.; Reggianini L.; Valenti C.; Olaru A.; Bandino S.; Deidda M.; Mercuro G.; Dessalvi C.C.; Marino P.N.; Di Ruocco M.V.; Sartori C.; Piccinino C.; Parrinello G.; Licata G.; Torres D.; Giambanco S.; Busalacchi S.; Arrotti S.; Novo S.; Inciardi R.M.; Pieri P.; Chirco P.R.; Galifi M.A.; Teresi G.; Buccheri D.; Minacapelli A.; Veniani M.; Frisinghelli A.; Priori S.G.; Cattaneo S.; Opasich C.; Gualco A.; Pagliaro M.; Mancone M.; Fedele F.; Cinque A.; Vellini M.; Scarfo I.; Romeo F.; Ferraiuolo F.; Sergi D.; Anselmi M.; Melandri F.; Leci E.; Iori E.; Bovolo V.; Pidello S.; Frea S.; Bergerone S.; Botta M.; Canavosio F.G.; Gaita F.; Merlo M.; Cinquetti M.; Sinagra G.; Ramani F.; Fabris E.; Stolfo D.; Artico J.; Miani D.; Fresco C.; Daneluzzi C.; Proclemer A.; Cicoira M.; Zanolla L.; Marchese G.; Torelli F.; Vassanelli C.; Voronina N.; Erglis A.; Tamakauskas V.; Smalinskas V.; Karaliute R.; Petraskiene I.; Kazakauskaite E.; Rumbinaite E.; Kavoliuniene A.; Vysniauskas V.; Brazyte-Ramanauskiene R.; Petraskiene D.; Stankala S.; Switala P.; Juszczyk Z.; Sinkiewicz W.; Gilewski W.; Pietrzak J.; Orzel T.; Kasztelowicz P.; Kardaszewicz P.; Lazorko-Piega M.; Gabryel J.; Mosakowska K.; Bellwon J.; Rynkiewicz A.; Raczak G.; Lewicka E.; Dabrowska-Kugacka A.; Bartkowiak R.; Sosnowska-Pasiarska B.; Wozakowska-Kaplon B.; Krzeminski A.; Zabojszcz M.; Mirek-Bryniarska E.; Grzegorzko A.; Bury K.; Nessler J.; Zalewski J.; Furman A.; Broncel M.; Poliwczak A.; Bala A.; Zycinski P.; Rudzinska M.; Jankowski L.; Kasprzak J.D.; Michalak L.; Soska K.W.; Drozdz J.; Huziuk I.; Retwinski A.; Flis P.; Weglarz J.; Bodys A.; Grajek S.; Kaluzna-Oleksy M.; Straburzynska-Migaj E.; Dankowski R.; Szymanowska K.; Grabia J.; Szyszka A.; Nowicka A.; Samcik M.; Wolniewicz L.; Baczynska K.; Komorowska K.; Poprawa I.; Komorowska E.; Sajnaga D.; Zolbach A.; Dudzik-Plocica A.; Abdulkarim A.-F.; Lauko-Rachocka A.; Kaminski L.; Kostka A.; Cichy A.; Ruszkowski P.; Splawski M.; Fitas G.; Szymczyk A.; Serwicka A.; Fiega A.; Zysko D.; Krysiak W.; Szabowski S.; Skorek E.; Pruszczyk P.; Bienias P.; Ciurzynski M.; Welnicki M.; Mamcarz A.; Folga A.; Zielinski T.; Rywik T.; Leszek P.; Sobieszczanska-Malek M.; Piotrowska M.; Kozar-Kaminska K.; Komuda K.; Wisniewska J.; Tarnowska A.; Balsam P.; Marchel M.; Opolski G.; Kaplon-Cieslicka A.; Gil R.J.; Mozenska O.; Byczkowska K.; Gil K.; Pawlak A.; Michalek A.; Krzesinski P.; Piotrowicz K.; Uzieblo-Zyczkowska B.; Stanczyk A.; Skrobowski A.; Ponikowski P.; Jankowska E.; Rozentryt P.; Polonski L.; Gadula-Gacek E.; Nowalany-Kozielska E.; Kuczaj A.; Kalarus Z.; Szulik M.; Przybylska K.; Klys J.; Prokop-Lewicka G.; Kleinrok A.; Aguiar C.T.; Ventosa A.; Pereira S.; Faria R.; Chin J.; De Jesus I.; Santos R.; Silva P.; Moreno N.; Queiros C.; Lourenco C.; Pereira A.; Castro A.; Andrade A.; Guimaraes T.O.; Martins S.; Placido R.; Lima G.; Brito D.; Francisco A.R.; Cardiga R.; Proenca M.; Araujo I.; Marques F.; Fonseca C.; Moura B.; Leite S.; Campelo M.; Silva-Cardoso J.; Rodrigues J.; Rangel I.; Martins E.; Correia A.S.; Peres M.; Marta L.; da Silva G.F.; Severino D.; Durao D.; Leao S.; Magalhaes P.; Moreira I.; Cordeiro A.F.; Ferreira C.; Araujo C.; Ferreira A.; Baptista A.; Radoi M.; Bicescu G.; Vinereanu D.; Sinescu C.-J.; Macarie C.; Popescu R.; Daha I.; Dan G.-A.; Stanescu C.; Dan A.; Craiu E.; Nechita E.; Aursulesei V.; Christodorescu R.; Otasevic P.; Seferovic P.M.; Simeunovic D.; Ristic A.D.; Celic V.; Pavlovic-Kleut M.; Lazic J.S.; Stojcevski B.; Pencic B.; Stevanovic A.; Andric A.; Iric-Cupic V.; Jovic M.; Davidovic G.; Milanov S.; Mitic V.; Atanaskovic V.; Antic S.; Pavlovic M.; Stanojevic D.; Stoickov V.; Ilic S.; Ilic M.D.; Petrovic D.; Stojsic S.; Kecojevic S.; Dodic S.; Adic N.C.; Cankovic M.; Stojiljkovic J.; Mihajlovic B.; Radin A.; Radovanovic S.; Krotin M.; Klabnik A.; Goncalvesova E.; Pernicky M.; Murin J.; Kovar F.; Kmec J.; Semjanova H.; Strasek M.; Iskra M.S.; Ravnikar T.; Suligoj N.C.; Komel J.; Fras Z.; Jug B.; Glavic T.; Losic R.; Bombek M.; Krajnc I.; Krunic B.; Horvat S.; Kovac D.; Rajtman D.; Cencic V.; Letonja M.; Winkler R.; Valentincic M.; Melihen-Bartolic C.; Bartolic A.; Vrckovnik M.P.; Kladnik M.; Pusnik C.S.; Marolt A.; Klen J.; Drnovsek B.; Leskovar B.; Anguita M.J.F.; Page J.C.G.; Martinez F.M.S.; Andres J.; Bayes-Genis A.; Mirabet S.; Mendez A.; Garcia-Cosio L.; Roig E.; Leon V.; Gonzalez-Costello J.; Muntane G.; Garay A.; Alcade-Martinez V.; Fernandez S.L.; Rivera-Lopez R.; Puga-Martinez M.; Fernandez-Alvarez M.; Serrano-Martinez J.L.; Crespo-Leiro M.; Grille-Cancela Z.; Marzoa-Rivas R.; Blanco-Canosa P.; Paniagua-Martin M.J.; Barge-Caballero E.; Cerdena I.L.; Baldomero I.F.H.; Padron A.L.; Rosillo S.O.; Gonzalez-Gallarza R.D.; Montanes O.S.; Manjavacas A.M.I.; Conde A.C.; Araujo A.; Soria T.; Garcia-Pavia P.; Gomez-Bueno M.; Cobo-Marcos M.; Alonso-Pulpon L.; Cubero J.S.; Sayago I.; Gonzalez-Segovia A.; Briceno A.; Subias P.E.; Hernandez M.V.; Cano M.J.R.; Sanchez M.A.G.; Jimenez J.F.D.; Garrido-Lestache E.B.; Pinilla J.M.G.; de la Villa B.G.; Sahuquillo A.; Marques R.B.; Calvo F.T.; Perez-Martinez M.T.; Gracia-Rodenas M.R.; Garrido-Bravo I.P.; Pastor-Perez F.; Pascual-Figal D.A.; Molina B.D.; Orus J.; Gonzalo F.E.; Bertomeu V.; Valero R.; Martinez-Abellan R.; Quiles J.; Rodrigez-Ortega J.A.; Mateo I.; ElAmrani A.; Fernandez-Vivancos C.; Valero D.B.; Almenar-Bonet L.; Sanchez-Lazaro I.J.; Marques-Sule E.; Facila-Rubio L.; Perez-Silvestre J.; Garcia-Gonzalez P.; Ridocci-Soriano F.; Garcia-Escriva D.; Pellicer-Cabo A.; de la Fuente Galan L.; Diaz J.L.; Platero A.R.; Arias J.C.; Blasco-Peiro T.; Julve M.S.; Sanchez-Insa E.; Aured-Guallar C.; Portoles-Ocampo A.; Melin M.; Hagglund E.; Stenberg A.; Lindahl I.-M.; Asserlund B.; Olsson L.; Dahlstrom U.; Afzelius M.; Karlstrom P.; Tengvall L.; Wiklund P.-A.; Olsson B.; Kalayci S.; Temizhan A.; Cavusoglu Y.; Gencer E.; Yilmaz M.B.; Gunes H.Chioncel, O.; Mebazaa, A.; Maggioni, A. P.; Harjola, V. -P.; Rosano, G.; Laroche, C.; Piepoli, M. F.; Crespo-Leiro, M. G.; Lainscak, M.; Ponikowski, P.; Filippatos, G.; Ruschitzka, F.; Seferovic, P.; Coats, A. J. S.; Lund, L. H.; Auer, J.; Ablasser, K.; Fruhwald, F.; Dolze, T.; Brandner, K.; Gstrein, S.; Poelzl, G.; Moertl, D.; Reiter, S.; Podczeck-Schweighofer, A.; Muslibegovic, A.; Vasilj, M.; Fazlibegovic, E.; Cesko, M.; Zelenika, D.; Palic, B.; Pravdic, D.; Cuk, D.; Vitlianova, K.; Katova, T.; Velikov, T.; Kurteva, T.; Gatzov, P.; Kamenova, D.; Antova, M.; Sirakova, V.; Krejci, J.; Mikolaskova, M.; Spinar, J.; Krupicka, J.; Malek, F.; Hegarova, M.; Lazarova, M.; Monhart, Z.; Hassanein, M.; Sobhy, M.; El Messiry, F.; El Shazly, A. H.; Elrakshy, Y.; Youssef, A.; Moneim, A. A.; Noamany, M.; Reda, A.; Dayem, T. K. A.; Farag, N.; Halawa, S. I.; Hamid, M. A.; Said, K.; Saleh, A.; Ebeid, H.; Hanna, R.; Aziz, R.; Louis, O.; Enen, M. A.; Ibrahim, B. S.; Nasr, G.; Elbahry, A.; Sobhy, H.; Ashmawy, M.; Gouda, M.; Aboleineen, W.; Bernard, Y.; Luporsi, P.; Meneveau, N.; Pillot, M.; Morel, M.; Seronde, M. -F.; Schiele, F.; Briand, F.; Delahaye, F.; Damy, T.; Eicher, J. -C.; de Groote, P.; Fertin, M.; Lamblin, N.; Isnard, R.; Lefol, C.; Thevenin, S.; Hagege, A.; Jondeau, G.; Logeart, D.; Le Marcis, V.; Ly, J. -F.; Coisne, D.; Lequeux, B.; Le Moal, V.; Mascle, S.; Lotton, P.; Behar, N.; Donal, E.; Thebault, C.; Ridard, C.; Reynaud, A.; Basquin, A.; Bauer, F.; Codjia, R.; Galinier, M.; Tourikis, P.; Stavroula, M.; Tousoulis, D.; Stefanadis, C.; Chrysohoou, C.; Kotrogiannis, I.; Matzaraki, V.; Dimitroula, T.; Karavidas, A.; Tsitsinakis, G.; Kapelios, C.; Nanas, J.; Kampouri, H.; Nana, E.; Kaldara, E.; Eugenidou, A.; Vardas, P.; Saloustros, I.; Patrianakos, A.; Tsaknakis, T.; Evangelou, S.; Nikoloulis, N.; Tziourganou, H.; Tsaroucha, A.; Papadopoulou, A.; Douras, A.; Polgar, L.; Merkely, B.; Kosztin, A.; Nyolczas, N.; Nagy, A. C.; Halmosi, R.; Elber, J.; Alony, I.; Shotan, A.; Fuhrmann, A. V.; Amir, O.; Romano, S.; Marcon, S.; Penco, M.; Di Mauro, M.; Lemme, E.; Carubelli, V.; Rovetta, R.; Metra, M.; Bulgari, M.; Quinzani, F.; Lombardi, C.; Bosi, S.; Schiavina, G.; Squeri, A.; Barbieri, A.; Di Tano, G.; Pirelli, S.; Ferrari, R.; Fucili, A.; Passero, T.; Musio, S.; Di Biase, M.; Correale, M.; Salvemini, G.; Brognoli, S.; Zanelli, E.; Giordano, A.; Agostoni, P.; Italiano, G.; Salvioni, E.; Copelli, S.; Modena, M. G.; Reggianini, L.; Valenti, C.; Olaru, A.; Bandino, S.; Deidda, M.; Mercuro, G.; Dessalvi, C. C.; Marino, P. N.; Di Ruocco, M. V.; Sartori, C.; Piccinino, C.; Parrinello, G.; Licata, G.; Torres, D.; Giambanco, S.; Busalacchi, S.; Arrotti, S.; Novo, S.; Inciardi, R. M.; Pieri, P.; Chirco, P. R.; Galifi, M. A.; Teresi, G.; Buccheri, D.; Minacapelli, A.; Veniani, M.; Frisinghelli, A.; Priori, S. G.; Cattaneo, S.; Opasich, C.; Gualco, A.; Pagliaro, M.; Mancone, M.; Fedele, F.; Cinque, A.; Vellini, M.; Scarfo, I.; Romeo, F.; Ferraiuolo, F.; Sergi, D.; Anselmi, M.; Melandri, F.; Leci, E.; Iori, E.; Bovolo, V.; Pidello, S.; Frea, S.; Bergerone, S.; Botta, M.; Canavosio, F. G.; Gaita, F.; Merlo, M.; Cinquetti, M.; Sinagra, G.; Ramani, F.; Fabris, E.; Stolfo, D.; Artico, J.; Miani, D.; Fresco, C.; Daneluzzi, C.; Proclemer, A.; Cicoira, M.; Zanolla, L.; Marchese, G.; Torelli, F.; Vassanelli, C.; Voronina, N.; Erglis, A.; Tamakauskas, V.; Smalinskas, V.; Karaliute, R.; Petraskiene, I.; Kazakauskaite, E.; Rumbinaite, E.; Kavoliuniene, A.; Vysniauskas, V.; Brazyte-Ramanauskiene, R.; Petraskiene, D.; Stankala, S.; Switala, P.; Juszczyk, Z.; Sinkiewicz, W.; Gilewski, W.; Pietrzak, J.; Orzel, T.; Kasztelowicz, P.; Kardaszewicz, P.; Lazorko-Piega, M.; Gabryel, J.; Mosakowska, K.; Bellwon, J.; Rynkiewicz, A.; Raczak, G.; Lewicka, E.; Dabrowska-Kugacka, A.; Bartkowiak, R.; Sosnowska-Pasiarska, B.; Wozakowska-Kaplon, B.; Krzeminski, A.; Zabojszcz, M.; Mirek-Bryniarska, E.; Grzegorzko, A.; Bury, K.; Nessler, J.; Zalewski, J.; Furman, A.; Broncel, M.; Poliwczak, A.; Bala, A.; Zycinski, P.; Rudzinska, M.; Jankowski, L.; Kasprzak, J. D.; Michalak, L.; Soska, K. W.; Drozdz, J.; Huziuk, I.; Retwinski, A.; Flis, P.; Weglarz, J.; Bodys, A.; Grajek, S.; Kaluzna-Oleksy, M.; Straburzynska-Migaj, E.; Dankowski, R.; Szymanowska, K.; Grabia, J.; Szyszka, A.; Nowicka, A.; Samcik, M.; Wolniewicz, L.; Baczynska, K.; Komorowska, K.; Poprawa, I.; Komorowska, E.; Sajnaga, D.; Zolbach, A.; Dudzik-Plocica, A.; Abdulkarim, A. -F.; Lauko-Rachocka, A.; Kaminski, L.; Kostka, A.; Cichy, A.; Ruszkowski, P.; Splawski, M.; Fitas, G.; Szymczyk, A.; Serwicka, A.; Fiega, A.; Zysko, D.; Krysiak, W.; Szabowski, S.; Skorek, E.; Pruszczyk, P.; Bienias, P.; Ciurzynski, M.; Welnicki, M.; Mamcarz, A.; Folga, A.; Zielinski, T.; Rywik, T.; Leszek, P.; Sobieszczanska-Malek, M.; Piotrowska, M.; Kozar-Kaminska, K.; Komuda, K.; Wisniewska, J.; Tarnowska, A.; Balsam, P.; Marchel, M.; Opolski, G.; Kaplon-Cieslicka, A.; Gil, R. J.; Mozenska, O.; Byczkowska, K.; Gil, K.; Pawlak, A.; Michalek, A.; Krzesinski, P.; Piotrowicz, K.; Uzieblo-Zyczkowska, B.; Stanczyk, A.; Skrobowski, A.; Ponikowski, P.; Jankowska, E.; Rozentryt, P.; Polonski, L.; Gadula-Gacek, E.; Nowalany-Kozielska, E.; Kuczaj, A.; Kalarus, Z.; Szulik, M.; Przybylska, K.; Klys, J.; Prokop-Lewicka, G.; Kleinrok, A.; Aguiar, C. T.; Ventosa, A.; Pereira, S.; Faria, R.; Chin, J.; De Jesus, I.; Santos, R.; Silva, P.; Moreno, N.; Queiros, C.; Lourenco, C.; Pereira, A.; Castro, A.; Andrade, A.; Guimaraes, T. O.; Martins, S.; Placido, R.; Lima, G.; Brito, D.; Francisco, A. R.; Cardiga, R.; Proenca, M.; Araujo, I.; Marques, F.; Fonseca, C.; Moura, B.; Leite, S.; Campelo, M.; Silva-Cardoso, J.; Rodrigues, J.; Rangel, I.; Martins, E.; Correia, A. S.; Peres, M.; Marta, L.; da Silva, G. F.; Severino, D.; Durao, D.; Leao, S.; Magalhaes, P.; Moreira, I.; Cordeiro, A. F.; Ferreira, C.; Araujo, C.; Ferreira, A.; Baptista, A.; Radoi, M.; Bicescu, G.; Vinereanu, D.; Sinescu, C. -J.; Macarie, C.; Popescu, R.; Daha, I.; Dan, G. -A.; Stanescu, C.; Dan, A.; Craiu, E.; Nechita, E.; Aursulesei, V.; Christodorescu, R.; Otasevic, P.; Seferovic, P. M.; Simeunovic, D.; Ristic, A. D.; Celic, V.; Pavlovic-Kleut, M.; Lazic, J. S.; Stojcevski, B.; Pencic, B.; Stevanovic, A.; Andric, A.; Iric-Cupic, V.; Jovic, M.; Davidovic, G.; Milanov, S.; Mitic, V.; Atanaskovic, V.; Antic, S.; Pavlovic, M.; Stanojevic, D.; Stoickov, V.; Ilic, S.; Ilic, M. D.; Petrovic, D.; Stojsic, S.; Kecojevic, S.; Dodic, S.; Adic, N. C.; Cankovic, M.; Stojiljkovic, J.; Mihajlovic, B.; Radin, A.; Radovanovic, S.; Krotin, M.; Klabnik, A.; Goncalvesova, E.; Pernicky, M.; Murin, J.; Kovar, F.; Kmec, J.; Semjanova, H.; Strasek, M.; Iskra, M. S.; Ravnikar, T.; Suligoj, N. C.; Komel, J.; Fras, Z.; Jug, B.; Glavic, T.; Losic, R.; Bombek, M.; Krajnc, I.; Krunic, B.; Horvat, S.; Kovac, D.; Rajtman, D.; Cencic, V.; Letonja, M.; Winkler, R.; Valentincic, M.; Melihen-Bartolic, C.; Bartolic, A.; Vrckovnik, M. P.; Kladnik, M.; Pusnik, C. S.; Marolt, A.; Klen, J.; Drnovsek, B.; Leskovar, B.; Anguita, M. J. F.; Page, J. C. G.; Martinez, F. M. S.; Andres, J.; Bayes-Genis, A.; Mirabet, S.; Mendez, A.; Garcia-Cosio, L.; Roig, E.; Leon, V.; Gonzalez-Costello, J.; Muntane, G.; Garay, A.; Alcade-Martinez, V.; Fernandez, S. L.; Rivera-Lopez, R.; Puga-Martinez, M.; Fernandez-Alvarez, M.; Serrano-Martinez, J. L.; Crespo-Leiro, M.; Grille-Cancela, Z.; Marzoa-Rivas, R.; Blanco-Canosa, P.; Paniagua-Martin, M. J.; Barge-Caballero, E.; Cerdena, I. L.; Baldomero, I. F. H.; Padron, A. L.; Rosillo, S. O.; Gonzalez-Gallarza, R. D.; Montanes, O. S.; Manjavacas, A. M. I.; Conde, A. C.; Araujo, A.; Soria, T.; Garcia-Pavia, P.; Gomez-Bueno, M.; Cobo-Marcos, M.; Alonso-Pulpon, L.; Cubero, J. S.; Sayago, I.; Gonzalez-Segovia, A.; Briceno, A.; Subias, P. E.; Hernandez, M. V.; Cano, M. J. R.; Sanchez, M. A. G.; Jimenez, J. F. D.; Garrido-Lestache, E. B.; Pinilla, J. M. G.; de la Villa, B. G.; Sahuquillo, A.; Marques, R. B.; Calvo, F. T.; Perez-Martinez, M. T.; Gracia-Rodenas, M. R.; Garrido-Bravo, I. P.; Pastor-Perez, F.; Pascual-Figal, D. A.; Molina, B. D.; Orus, J.; Gonzalo, F. E.; Bertomeu, V.; Valero, R.; Martinez-Abellan, R.; Quiles, J.; Rodrigez-Ortega, J. A.; Mateo, I.; Elamrani, A.; Fernandez-Vivancos, C.; Valero, D. B.; Almenar-Bonet, L.; Sanchez-Lazaro, I. J.; Marques-Sule, E.; Facila-Rubio, L.; Perez-Silvestre, J.; Garcia-Gonzalez, P.; Ridocci-Soriano, F.; Garcia-Escriva, D.; Pellicer-Cabo, A.; de la Fuente Galan, L.; Diaz, J. L.; Platero, A. R.; Arias, J. C.; Blasco-Peiro, T.; Julve, M. S.; Sanchez-Insa, E.; Aured-Guallar, C.; Portoles-Ocampo, A.; Melin, M.; Hagglund, E.; Stenberg, A.; Lindahl, I. -M.; Asserlund, B.; Olsson, L.; Dahlstrom, U.; Afzelius, M.; Karlstrom, P.; Tengvall, L.; Wiklund, P. -A.; Olsson, B.; Kalayci, S.; Temizhan, A.; Cavusoglu, Y.; Gencer, E.; Yilmaz, M. B.; Gunes, H