6 research outputs found

    APD<sub>90</sub> restitution slope characteristics.

    No full text
    <p>RVA β€Š=β€Š right ventricular apex, RVOT β€Š=β€Š right ventricular outflow tract.</p

    Representative restitution curves.

    No full text
    <p>APD<sub>90</sub> restitution curves from one patient with DCM recorded at the right ventricular apex (RVA) and the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). For both recording sites, the restitution curves of S<sub>2</sub>, S<sub>3</sub>, and S<sub>4</sub> are shown. The linear fit to the 40 ms diastolic interval (DI) with the maximum slope is superimposed on the respective curve. The maximum slope value is denoted adjacent to the curve.</p

    ERP/APD<sub>90</sub> ratios at the two RV sites.

    No full text
    <p>RVA β€Š=β€Š right ventricular apex, RVOT β€Š=β€Š right ventricular outflow tract.</p

    Representative MAP recordings.

    No full text
    <p>Monophasic action potentials (MAPs) recorded at the right ventricular apex (RVA) in a patient with ICM during baseline pacing (A) and during programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) (B). Basic cycle length (S<sub>1</sub>–S<sub>1</sub>) was 500 ms, respectively. (A) Action potential durations (APD) were measured from MAP onset to the 90% repolarization level (APD<sub>90</sub>). Diastolic interval (DI) span from APD<sub>90</sub> of the preceding MAP to the onset of the current MAP. (B) MAP recordings were obtained during PVS using three extrastimuli. In this example, the first two extrastimuli (S<sub>2</sub> and S<sub>3</sub>) were already delivered at the shortest coupling intervals (S<sub>1</sub>–S<sub>2</sub> 235 ms, S<sub>2</sub>–S<sub>3</sub> 218 ms), while the introduction of the third extrastimulus (S<sub>4</sub>) was still in progress and the shortest possible S<sub>3</sub>–S<sub>4</sub> interval had not been reached yet.</p

    Baseline clinical characteristics.

    No full text
    <p>ACE β€Š=β€Š angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARB β€Š=β€Š angiotensin-receptor blocker, ICD β€Š=β€Š implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, MAP β€Š=β€Š monophasic action potential recording, PVS β€Š=β€Š programmed ventricular stimulation.</p

    Survival curves.

    No full text
    <p>Kaplan-Meier survival curves for event-free survival of 74 patients with ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy. (A) Based on maximum APD<sub>90</sub> restitution slope S<sub>2</sub><1 or β‰₯1, there was no difference in reaching the combined end-point of death and/or appropriate ICD (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator) therapy (<i>p</i>β€Š=β€Š0.79). (B) Based on dichotomized ERP/APD<sub>90</sub> ratios for S<sub>1</sub>, there was no difference in reaching the combined end-point of death and/or appropriate ICD therapy (<i>p</i>β€Š=β€Š0.57). (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on negative or positive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Mortality and/or appropriate ICD therapy was higher in patients with positive PVS (<i>p</i>β€Š=β€Š0.006).</p
    corecore