Measurable residual disease, FLT3-ITD mutation, and disease status have independent prognostic influence on outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confer a survival advantage in the absence of FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD). Here, we investigated the main predictors of outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We identified 1572 adult (age &gt;= 18 year) patients with NPM1-mutated AML in first complete remission (CR1:78%) or second complete remission (CR2:22%) who were transplanted from matched sibling donors (30.8%) or unrelated donors (57.4%) between 2007 and 2019 at EBMT participating centers. Median follow-up for survivors was 23.7 months. FLT3-ITD was present in 69.3% of patients and 39.2% had detectable minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) at transplant. In multivariate analysis, relapse incidence (RI) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were negatively affected by concomitant FLT3-ITD mutation (HR 1.66 p = 0.0001, and HR 1.53, p &lt; 0.0001, respectively), MRD positivity at transplant (HR 2.18, p &lt; 10(-5) and HR 1.71, p &lt; 10(-5), respectively), and transplant in CR2 (HR 1.36, p = 0.026, and HR 1.26, p = 0.033, respectively), but positively affected by Karnofsky score &gt;= 90 (HR 0.74, p = 0.012, and HR 0.7, p = 0.0002, respectively). Overall survival (OS) was also negatively influenced by concomitant FLT3-ITD (HR 1.6, p = 0.0001), MRD positivity at transplant (HR 1.61, p &lt; 10(-5)), and older age (HR 1.22 per 10 years, p &lt; 0.0001), but positively affected by matched sibling donor (unrelated donor: HR 1.35, p = 0.012; haploidentical donor: HR 1.45, p = 0.037) and Karnofsky score &gt;= 90 (HR 0.73, p = 0.004). These results highlight the independent and significant role of FLT3-ITD, MRD status, and disease status on posttransplant outcomes in patients with NPM1-mutated AML allowing physicians to identify patients at risk of relapse who may benefit from posttransplant prophylactic interventions.</p

Bone marrow graft versus peripheral blood graft in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells transplantation: a retrospective analysis in1344 patients of SFGM-TC registry.

peer reviewedThe use of peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) stem cells graft in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis remains controversial. Moreover, the value of adding anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) to PTCy is unknown. A total of 1344 adult patients received an unmanipulated haploidentical transplant at 37 centers from 2012 to 2019 for hematologic malignancy. We compared the outcomes of patients according to the type of graft, using a propensity score analysis. In total population, grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) were lower with BM than with PB. Grade III-IV aGVHD was lower with BM than with PB + ATG. All outcomes were similar in PB and PB + ATG groups. Then, in total population, adding ATG does not benefit the procedure. In acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative syndrome (AL-MDS-MPS) subgroup receiving non-myeloablative conditioning, risk of relapse was twice greater with BM than with PB (51 vs. 22%, respectively). Conversely, risk of aGVHD was greater with PB (38% for aGVHD II-IV; 16% for aGVHD III-IV) than with BM (28% for aGVHD II-IV; 8% for aGVHD III-IV). In this subgroup with intensified conditioning regimen, risk of relapse became similar with PB and BM but risk of aGVHD III-IV remained higher with PB than with BM graft (HR = 2.0; range [1.17-3.43], p = 0.012)

COVID-19 paraclinical diagnostic tools: Updates and future trends

International audienceMotivation: COVID-19 is one of the most widely affecting pandemics. As for many respiratory viruses-caused diseases, diagnosis of COVID-19 relies on two main compartments: clinical and paraclinical diagnostic criteria. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is vital in such a pandemic. On one side, rapidity may enhance management effectiveness, while on the other, coupling efficiency and less costly procedures may permit more effective community-scale management.Methodology and main structure: In this review, we shed light on the most used and the most validated diagnostic tools. Furthermore, we intend to include few under-development techniques that may be potentially useful in this context. The practical intent of our work is to provide clinicians with a realistic summarized review of the essential elements in the applied paraclinical diagnosis of COVID-19

Current limitations and perspectives of chimeric antigen receptor-T-cells in acute myeloid leukemia

Adoptive transfer of gene-engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cells has emerged as a powerful immunotherapy for combating hematologic cancers. Several target antigens that are prevalently expressed on AML cells have undergone evaluation in preclinical CAR-T-cell testing. Attributes of an ‘ideal’ target antigen for CAR-T-cell therapy in AML include high-level expression on leukemic blasts and leukemic stem cells (LSCs), and absence on healthy tissues, normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). In contrast to other blood cancer types, where CAR-T therapies are being similarly studied, only a rather small number of AML patients has received CAR-T-cell treatment in clinical trials, resulting in limited clinical experience for this therapeutic approach in AML. For curative AML treatment, abrogation of bulk blasts and LSCs is mandatory with the need for hematopoietic recovery after CAR-T administration. Herein, we provide a critical review of the current pipeline of candidate target antigens and corresponding CAR-T-cell products in AML, assess challenges for clinical translation and implementation in routine clinical practice, as well as perspectives for overcoming them

Evaluation d une échelle de certitude diagnostique de syndrome myélodysplasique d une cohorte de 518 patients

Le diagnostic de myélodysplasie demeure incertain chez un nombre non négligeable de patients malgré une démarche bien codifiée reposant sur l hémogramme, le frottis sanguin et médullaire ainsi que le caryotype. Le but de notre étude est de suivre cette catégorie de patients afin d étudier les différents paramètres susceptibles de confirmer un tel diagnostic. Une cohorte de 518 patients a été constituée sur une période de 3 ans devant la suspicion de syndrome myélodysplasique (MDS). Chez soixante-douze patients une autre cause qu une MDS a été retenue d emblée. Les autres 446 patients ont été classés, selon des critères de certitude initiale, en 3 catégories : possible , probable et certain . Cent-vingt-deux patients ont été perdus de vue. Chez 28 patients sur 84 du groupe possible une autre étiologie a été retenue, 25 montraient une cytopénie persistante sans cause évidente et 31 sont passés à un niveau certain après un suivi moyen de 16.2 mois. Chez ces derniers, une culture des progéniteurs a été réalisée au deuxième prélèvement médullaire dans 42% des cas et est revenue pathologique dans 85% des cas. Sur les 148 patients classés en niveau initial probable , 4 patients ont corrigé leurs anomalies au bout de 6 mois, les autres 144 patients ont été suivis sur une période moyenne de 21.1 mois et passant à un niveau final certain . Les cultures des progéniteurs réalisées initialement dans 66.7% des cas sont revenues pathologiques dans 67% des cas. Parmi les 92 patients classés en niveau certain un seul patient a eu son diagnostic de MDS infirmé. Notre étude suggère une contribution significative de la culture des progéniteurs dans le diagnostic initial de MDS.ST ETIENNE-BU Médecine (422182102) / SudocSudocFranceF

Graft failure, poor graft function erythroblastopenia: Actualization of definitions, diagnosis and treatment: Recommendations of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and cell therapy (SFGM-TC) 2021.

peer reviewedIn this article, we discuss again the definition, the risk factor and guideline to treat the graft failure, the poor graft function and erythrobalstopenia. Graft failure is a severe but rare complication after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Despite disparity in the literature, we defined this complication and discussed the factor risks and recommendation for treatment based on new studies. Poor graft function is also a more frequent complication after HCT. New studies will soon be available to prove or not the current recommendation suggested in this article based on therapeutics medicine or cellular therapy. Erythroblastopenia, is a rarer complication post HCT. Despite anticipation for a better choice of compatibility donor/recipient, some patients still suffer from this complication

Atelier d’harmonisations 2019 : indications et organisation d’une microtransplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiquesIndications and management of hematologic microtransplantation: Recommendations of the French Society of Bone Marrow transplantation and cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)

Microtransplantation (MT) is based on injection of HLA-mismatched G-CSF mobilized hematopoietic stem cells, in combination with chemotherapy but without use of conditioning regimen nor immunosuppressive drugs. As a result, a transient microchimerism is induced without engraftment. Its efficacy relies both on host immune system stimulation (recipient versus tumor) and on a graft versus tumor effect. Data are scarce and concern mostly Asian patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS). In comparison to conventional treatment without MT, higher complete remission rates and longer disease free survival and overall survival have been reported. Safety seems acceptable. The most frequent adverse event is non-severe cytokine release syndrome. Risk of GVHD remains very low. Here, we summarize the published data and detail the practical aspects of the procedure. Current data are not strong enough to provide recommendations on indications. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to propose MT to patients with AML or HR-MDS, regardless of age, presenting an indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation but ineligible for it. MT is still under investigation and rather be proposed within clinical trials

Clinical and economic impact of treated CMV infection in adult CMV‐seropositive patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

International audienc

The promising efficacy of a risk-based letermovir use strategy in CMV-positive allogeneic hematopoietic cell recipients.

International audienceLetermovir is the first approved drug for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection prophylaxis in adult patients who are CMV positive undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Because CMV infection risk varies from patient to patient, we evaluated whether a risk-based strategy could be effective. In this single-center study, all consecutive adult patients who were CMV positive and underwent allo-HCT between 2015 and 2021 were included. During period 1 (2015-2017), letermovir was not used, whereas during period 2 (2018-2021), letermovir was used in patients at high risk but not in patients at low risk, except in those receiving corticosteroids. In patients at high risk, the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) in period 2 was lower than that in period 1 (P < .001) by week 14 (10.5% vs 51.6%) and week 24 (16.9% vs 52.7%). In patients at low risk, although only 28.6% of patients received letermovir in period 2, csCMVi incidence was also significantly lower (P = .003) by week 14 (7.9% vs 29.0%) and week 24 (11.2% vs 33.3%). Among patients at low risk who did not receive letermovir (n = 45), 23 patients (51.1%) experienced transient positive CMV DNA without csCMVi, whereas 17 patients (37.8%) experienced negative results. In both risk groups, the 2 periods were comparable for CMV disease, overall survival, progression-free survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality. We concluded that a risk-based strategy for letermovir use is an effective strategy which maintains the high efficacy of letermovir in patients at high risk but allows some patients at low risk to not use letermovir