Self-reported oral health problems and the ability to organize dental care of community-dwelling elderly aged >= 75years

BackgroundIt is unclear how many community-dwelling elderly (>= 75years) experience oral health problems (e.g. pain, dry mouth, chewing problems) and how they manage their dental care needs. This study aimed to assess self-reported oral health problems in elderly who are frail or have complex care needs, and their ability to organize dental care when reporting oral pain.MethodsThree thousand five hundred thirty-three community-dwelling elderly participating in the "Embrace" project were asked to complete questionnaires regarding oral status and oral health problems. Frailty was assessed with the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI). Intermed for Elderly Self-Assessment (IM-E-SA) was used to determine complexity of care needs. Next, elderly who reported oral pain were interviewed about their oral pain complaints, their need for dental care, and their ability to organize and receive dental care. For statistical analyses Chi(2)-tests and the one-way ANOVA were used.ResultsOne thousand six hundred twenty-two elderly (45.9%) completed the questionnaires. Dry mouth (11.7%) and oral pain (6.2%) were most frequently reported. Among the elderly reporting oral pain, most were registered at a local dentist and could go there when needed (84.3%). Robust elderly visited the dentist independently (87%), frail (55.6%) and complex (26.9%) elderly more often required assistance from caregivers.ConclusionsDry mouth and oral pain are most reported oral health problems among community-dwelling elderly. Elderly with complex care needs report most oral health problems. In case an elderly seeks dental treatment to alleviate an oral pain complaint, most elderly in this study were able to organize dental care and transport to the dentist. Frail and complex elderly often need assistance from caregivers to visit the dentist. Therefore caretakers should keep in mind that when frailty progresses, visiting a dentist may become more and more difficult and the risk for poor oral health increases

Experiences of Community-Living Older Adults Receiving Integrated Care Based on the Chronic Care Model:A Qualitative Study

Integrated care models aim to solve the problem of fragmented and poorly coordinated care in current healthcare systems. These models aim to be patient-centered by providing continuous and coordinated care and by considering the needs and preferences of patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the opinions and experiences of community-living older adults with regard to integrated care and support, along with the extent to which it meets their health and social needs.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 older adults receiving integrated care and support through "Embrace," an integrated care model for community-living older adults that is based on the Chronic Care Model and a population health management model. Embrace is currently fully operational in the northern region of the Netherlands. Data analysis was based on the grounded theory approach.Responses of participants concerned two focus areas: 1) Experiences with aging, with the themes "Struggling with health," "Increasing dependency," "Decreasing social interaction," "Loss of control," and "Fears;" and 2) Experiences with Embrace, with the themes "Relationship with the case manager," "Interactions," and "Feeling in control, safe, and secure". The prospect of becoming dependent and losing control was a key concept in the lives of the older adults interviewed. Embrace reinforced the participants' ability to stay in control, even if they were dependent on others. Furthermore, participants felt safe and secure, in contrast to the fears of increasing dependency within the standard care system.The results indicate that integrated care and support provided through Embrace met the health and social needs of older adults, who were coping with the consequences of aging

The Future of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Hand Surgery - Combining Evolutionary Pharmacology and Surgical Technique

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic autoimmune disease of uncertain aetiology, which is characterized primarily by synovial inflammation with secondary skeletal destructions

Recent advances in ankylosing spondylitis: understanding the disease and management

The term spondyloarthritis refers to a group of immune-mediated diseases characterised by inflammation of the axial skeleton, peripheral joints, and entheses. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the most common and characteristic of these entities and even though it was first described over two centuries ago, the understanding of the underlying disease mechanism remains incomplete. It is known that around 40% of patients with AS have subclinical bowel inflammation, suggesting that the origin of the disease could be in the gut. Also, more genes and new molecules have demonstrated a role in the pathogenesis of AS. In this review, we analyse the latest therapies for spondyloarthritis and the most relevant discoveries over the last three years, together with their implications for different aspects of the disease

SamenOud, geïntegreerde ouderenzorg in de eerste lijn

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of Embrace (Dutch: SamenOud), a new primary care model for community-living people aged over 75 years on perceived quality of care. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial in 15 general practices in the East Groningen region of the Netherlands. METHOD: In the period January 2012-March 2013, 1456 general practice patients aged 75 years and older were stratified on the basis of self-reporting into 3 risk profiles: 'robust', 'frail' and 'complex care needs', and then randomized to the intervention or the control arm. Intervention consisted of care and support from an elderly-care team consisting of a specialist in Gerontology, a district nurse, and a social worker. Intensity and duration of the care and support were dependent on risk profile. The primary outcome measure was quality of care as reported by participants; the secondary outcome measure was the extent of implementation as reported by the caregivers. RESULTS: The level of perceived quality of care after 12 months was slightly higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm, but the effect size was quite small. The difference was significant in elderly people with the risk profiles 'frail' and 'complex care needs'; robust elderly people did not experience a significant difference. The caregivers reported increased implementation of integrated care (effect size 0.71, that means average). CONCLUSION: Embrace slightly improved the perceived quality of care, particularly for elderly people with complex care needs for whom case management was organised. Caregivers judged implementation of integrated care to be greatly improved, though there was still room for further improvement. Further research should be carried out into the effectiveness of integrated primary care for the elderly on health, service-use and healthcare costs

Embrace, integrated primary care for older adults

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of Embrace (Dutch: SamenOud), a new primary care model for community-living people aged over 75 years on perceived quality of care.DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial in 15 general practices in the East Groningen region of the Netherlands.METHOD: In the period January 2012-March 2013, 1456 general practice patients aged 75 years and older were stratified on the basis of self-reporting into 3 risk profiles: 'robust', 'frail' and 'complex care needs', and then randomized to the intervention or the control arm. Intervention consisted of care and support from an elderly-care team consisting of a specialist in Gerontology, a district nurse, and a social worker. Intensity and duration of the care and support were dependent on risk profile. The primary outcome measure was quality of care as reported by participants; the secondary outcome measure was the extent of implementation as reported by the caregivers.RESULTS: The level of perceived quality of care after 12 months was slightly higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm, but the effect size was quite small. The difference was significant in elderly people with the risk profiles 'frail' and 'complex care needs'; robust elderly people did not experience a significant difference. The caregivers reported increased implementation of integrated care (effect size 0.71, that means average).CONCLUSION: Embrace slightly improved the perceived quality of care, particularly for elderly people with complex care needs for whom case management was organised. Caregivers judged implementation of integrated care to be greatly improved, though there was still room for further improvement. Further research should be carried out into the effectiveness of integrated primary care for the elderly on health, service-use and healthcare costs.</p