60 research outputs found

    Characterizing the correlation between motor cortical neural firing and grasping kinematics

    Get PDF
    The hand has evolved to allow specialized interactions with our surroundings that define much of what makes us human. Comprised of numerous joints allowing 23 separate degrees-of-freedom (DoF) (joint motions) of movement, the hand and wrist are exceedingly complex. In order to better understand the constraints and principles underlying the neural control of the hand, we have carried out a series of neurophysiological experiments with monkeys performing a variety of reaching and grasping tasks. This work uses linear regression and low dimensional analysis to probe the neural representation of hand kinematics.We find that the kinematics of the three wrist DoFs (flexion, abduction and rotation) are rashly independent from hand-shape DoFs, and are considered separately. With respect to the wrist DoF, we show that the firing patterns of individual motor cortical cells are more linearly related to joint position than joint angular velocity. Using tuning functions from multivariate linear regressions, the firing rates from a population of cells accurately predicted three DoF of wrist orientation. We used principal components analysis to simplify the complex kinematics of the hand. Although the majority of the variability in hand kinematics can be explained with a small number (~7) of characteristic hand shapes (synergies), we find that these synergies do not capture the majority of neural variability. Both higher-order and lower-order synergies are well represented in the neural data. Although the kinematic synergies do not fully characterize neural firing, they can be utilized to simplify hand shape decoding. Using an optimal linear estimator, we predicted the average wrist and hand shape from the firing rates of 327 motor cortical cells with an accuracy as high as 92%. Individual motor cortical neurons are not well correlated with single joint variables; rather, they correlate with a number of joints in a complex way. This work provides evidence that hand movements are likely controlled through an intricate network of motor systems, of which motor cortical neurons contribute by making fine adjustments to a basic substrate. Further understanding of the control system will be gained by establishing a model that captures both the hand kinematic and neural variability

    Systematic review to evaluate algorithms for REBOA use in trauma and identify a consensus for patient selection.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Patient selection for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has evolved during the last decade. A recent multicenter collaboration to implement the newest generation REBOA balloon catheter identified variability in patient selection criteria. The aims of this systematic review were to compare recent REBOA patient selection guidelines and to identify current areas of consensus and variability. METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for REBOA patient selection in trauma. Published algorithms from 2015 to 2022 and institutional guidelines from a seven-center REBOA collaboration were compiled and synthesized. RESULTS: Ten published algorithms and seven institutional guidelines on REBOA patient selection were included. Broad consensus exists on REBOA deployment for blunt and penetrating trauma patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage refractory to blood product resuscitation. Algorithms diverge on precise systolic blood pressure triggers for early common femoral artery access and REBOA deployment, as well as the use of REBOA for traumatic arrest and chest or extremity hemorrhage control. CONCLUSION: Although our convenience sample of institutional guidelines likely underestimates patient selection variability, broad consensus exists in the published literature regarding REBOA deployment for blunt and penetrating trauma patients with hypotension not responsive to resuscitation. Several areas of patient selection variability reflect individual practice environments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5, systematic review
    corecore