The MAGNOLIA Trial: Zanubrutinib, a Next-Generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy in Relapsed/Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Purpose: Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an uncommon non-Hodgkin lymphoma with malignant cells that exhibit a consistent dependency on B-cell receptor signaling. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib, a next-generation selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/ refractory (R/R) MZL. Patients and Methods: Patients with R/R MZL were enrolled in the phase II MAGNOLIA (BGB-3111-214) study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) as determined by an independent review committee (IRC) based on the Lugano 2014 classification. Results: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 1.6 to 21.9 months), the IRCassessed ORR was 68.2% and complete response (CR) was 25.8%. The ORR by investigator assessment was 74.2%, and the CR rate was 25.8%. The median duration of response (DOR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review was not reached. The IRC-assessed DOR rate at 12 months was 93.0%, and IRC-assessed PFS rate was 82.5% at both 12 and 15 months. Treatment was well tolerated with the majority of adverse events (AE) being grade 1 or 2. The most common AEs were diarrhea (22.1%), contusion (20.6%), and constipation (14.7%). Atrial fibrillation/flutter was reported in 2 patients; 1 patient had grade 3 hypertension. No patient experienced major hemorrhage. In total, 4 patients discontinued treatment due to AEs, none of which were considered treatment-related by the investigators. Conclusions: Zanubrutinib demonstrated highORRand CR rate with durable disease control and a favorable safety profile in patients with R/R MZL. _2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research

A role for pharmacists in community-based post-discharge warfarin management: protocol for the 'the role of community pharmacy in post hospital management of patients initiated on warfarin' study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Shorter periods of hospitalisation and increasing warfarin use have placed stress on community-based healthcare services to care for patients taking warfarin after hospital discharge, a high-risk period for these patients. A previous randomised controlled trial demonstrated that a post-discharge service of 4 home visits and point-of-care (POC) International Normalised Ratio (INR) testing by a trained pharmacist improved patients' outcomes. The current study aims to modify this previously trialled service model to implement and then evaluate a sustainable program to enable the smooth transition of patients taking warfarin from the hospital to community setting.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The service will be trialled in 8 sites across 3 Australian states using a prospective, controlled cohort study design. Patients discharged from hospital taking warfarin will receive 2 or 3 home visits by a trained 'home medicines review (HMR)-accredited' pharmacist in their 8 to 10 days after hospital discharge. Visits will involve a HMR, comprehensive warfarin education, and POC INR monitoring in collaboration with patients' general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists. Patient outcomes will be compared to those in a control, or 'usual care', group. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients experiencing a major bleeding event in the 90 days after discharge. Secondary outcome measures will include combined major bleeding and thromboembolic events, death, cessation of warfarin therapy, INR control at 8 days post-discharge and unplanned hospital readmissions from any cause. Stakeholder satisfaction will be assessed using structured postal questionnaire mailed to patients, GPs, community pharmacists and accredited pharmacists at the completion of their study involvement.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This study design incorporates several aspects of prior interventions that have been demonstrated to improve warfarin management, including POC INR testing, warfarin education and home visits by trained pharmacists. It faces several potential challenges, including the tight timeframe for patient follow-up in the post-discharge period. Its strengths lie in a strong multidisciplinary team and the utilisation of existing healthcare frameworks. It is hoped that this study will provide the evidence to support the national roll-out of the program as a new Australian professional community pharmacy service.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number <a href="http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=82959">12608000334303</a>.</p

Evaluation of three automated chromogenic FVIII kits for the diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A

In some mild haemophilia A patients (discrepant phenotype), coagulation FVIII levels by one-stage assay (FVIII-1st) are more than double those by classical two-stage coagulation assay (FVIII-2st), and may fall within the normal range. Our aim was to assess automated two-stage chromogenic FVIII assays (FVIII-chr) for diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A. Three chromogenic FVIII kits (Biophen, Coamatic and Dade-Behring) were evaluated, using recommended and extended incubation times. Samples were tested from patients with discrepant haemophilia (n = 7) and equivalent mild haemophilia (agreement between FVIII-1st and FVIII-2st, n = 4). For equivalent haemophilia, FVIII-chr were consistent with FVIII-1st and FVIII-2st for all kits at all incubation times. For discrepant haemophilia, using recommended incubation times, mean FVIII-chr using Biophen reagents was 22 IU/dl (range 13-31), with Coamatic 26 (17-34) and with Dade-Behring 41 (33-47), compared with 36 (27-44) for FVIII-1st and 8 (6-9) for FVIII-2st. FVIII-chr decreased as incubation time was increased with Biophen and Coamatic, but decreased less with Dade-Behring. FVIII-chr using the Dade-Behring kit gave similar results to FVIII-1st and is not suitable for diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A. FVIII-chr by Biophen and Coamatic kits is suitable for diagnosis of these patients, especially with an extended incubation time.S. E. Rodgers, E. M. Duncan, M. Sobieraj-Teague, J. V. Lloy

Resistance to proteasome inhibitors and other targeted therapies in myeloma

The number of novel therapies for the treatment of myeloma is rapidly increasing, as are the clinical trials evaluating them in combination with other novel and established therapies. Proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents and monoclonal antibodies are the most well known and studied classes of novel agents targeting myeloma, with histone deacetylase inhibitors, nuclear export inhibitors and several other approaches also being actively investigated. However, in parallel with the development and clinical use of these novel myeloma therapies is the emergence of novel mechanisms of resistance, many of which remain elusive, particularly for more recently developed agents. Whilst resistance mechanisms have been best studied for proteasome inhibitors, particularly bortezomib, class effects do not universally apply to all class members, and within-class differences in efficacy, toxicity and resistance mechanisms have been observed. Although immunomodulatory agents share the common cellular target cereblon and thus resistance patterns relate to cereblon expression, the unique cell surface antigens to which monoclonal antibodies are directed means these agents frequently exhibit unique within-class differences in clinical efficacy and resistance patterns. This review describes the major classes of novel therapies for myeloma, highlights the major clinical trials within each class and discusses known resistance mechanisms.Craig T. Wallington‐Beddoe, Magdalena Sobieraj‐Teague, Bryone J. Kuss Stuart M. Pitso

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: do trial results enable clinicians and patients to evaluate whether the benefits justify the risk? Proceedings of an Ad Hoc Working Group Meeting

Physicians and patients consider the balance between benefits and risks of treatment when making decisions about the use of anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The results of early trials demonstrating the efficacy of heparin compared with placebo or no thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) led to adoption of routine anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients considered to be at increased risk of VTE. More recent trials comparing new anticoagulants with heparin have most commonly used the composite outcome, asymptomatic (or "silent") deep vein thrombosis (DVT), detected by screening venography, and symptomatic (or "patient-important") VTE, as the primary measure of efficacy [1-3]. © 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasi

Assessment of agreement and time in therapeutic range of capillary versus venous international normalised ratio in frail elderly people in a nursing home

International audienceVitamin K antagonists are widely used, yet have a slim therapeutic margin and high iatrogenicity. Patients are monitored through international normalised ratio (INR) by venipuncture, but coagulometers could measure INR by capillary puncture. This prospective study evaluated the clinical concordance of capillary INR versus venous INR in 31 nursing home patients. Concordance was good and mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) markedly increased. Capillary INR is thus reliable, could improve TTR and decrease iatrogenicity