31 research outputs found
A Pepducin Derived from the Third Intracellular Loop of FPR2 Is a Partial Agonist for Direct Activation of This Receptor in Neutrophils But a Full Agonist for Cross-Talk Triggered Reactivation of FPR2
We recently described a novel receptor cross-talk mechanism in neutrophils, unique in that the signals generated by the PAF receptor (PAFR) and the ATP receptor (P2Y2R) transfer formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) from a desensitized (non-signaling) state back to an actively signaling state (Forsman H et al., PLoS One, 8:e60169, 2013; Önnheim K, et al., Exp Cell Res, 323∶209, 2014). In addition to the G-protein coupled FPR1, neutrophils also express the closely related receptor FPR2. In this study we used an FPR2 specific pepducin, proposed to work as an allosteric modulator at the cytosolic signaling interface, to determine whether the cross-talk pathway is utilized also by FPR2. The pepducin used contains a fatty acid linked to a peptide sequence derived from the third intracellular loop of FPR2, and it activates as well as desensensitizes this receptor. We now show that neutrophils desensitized with the FPR2-specific pepducin display increased cellular responses to stimulation with PAF or ATP. The secondary PAF/ATP induced response was sensitive to FPR2-specific inhibitors, disclosing a receptor cross-talk mechanism underlying FPR2 reactivation. The pepducin induced an activity in naïve cells similar to that of a conventional FPR2 agonist, but with lower potency (partial efficacy), meaning that the pepducin is a partial agonist. The PAF- or ATP-induced reactivation was, however, much more pronounced when neutrophils had been desensitized to the pepducin as compared to cells desensitized to conventional agonists. The pepducin should thus in this respect be classified as a full agonist. In summary, we demonstrate that desensitized FPR2 can be transferred back to an actively signaling state by receptor cross-talk signals generated through PAFR and P2Y2R, and the difference in agonist potency with respect to pepducin-induced direct receptor activation and cross-talk reactivation of FPR2 puts the concept of functional selectivity in focus
Structure–Function Characteristics and Signaling Properties of Lipidated Peptidomimetic FPR2 Agonists: Peptoid Stereochemistry and Residues in the Vicinity of the Headgroup Affect Function
Formyl
peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) plays important roles in inflammation.
In the present study, 20 analogues of the FPR2-selective lipidated
α-peptide/β-peptoid agonist Lau-[(S)-Aoc]-[Lys-βNPhe]6-NH2 were generated, which allowed two novel subclasses
of more potent FPR2 agonists to be distinguished. Critical factors
influencing FPR2 recognition comprise the presence of β-peptoid
phenylalanine-like residues (i.e., βNPhe, βNspe, or βNrpe)
in the peptidomimetic tail, configuration of the 2-aminooctanoic acid
(Aoc) in the headgroup, and the length of the N-terminal fatty acid.
Intriguingly, a single βNrpe residue in the vicinity of the
N-terminus (i.e., Lau-[(S)-Aoc]-Lys-βNrpe-[Lys-βNPhe]5-NH2) proved to increase the agonist potency, whereas
the βNspe-containing analogue was a weak FPR2-selective antagonist.
Another subclass displaying potent agonism comprised analogues possessing
two α-amino acids vicinal to the headgroup. The optimized FPR2-activating
lipidated peptidomimetics exhibited biased signaling: PLC-PIP2-Ca2+ signaling was activated, but without recruitment
of β-arrestin or induction of chemotaxis. These FPR2-interacting
compounds are considered to be useful tools in future studies of receptor–ligand
interactions
Structural changes of the ligand and of the receptor alters the receptor preference for neutrophil activating peptides starting with a 3 formylmethionyl group
AbstractPathogenic Staphylococcus aureus strains produce N-formylmethionyl containing peptides, of which the tetrapeptide fMIFL is a potent activator of the neutrophil formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) and the PSMα2 peptide is a potent activator of the closely related FPR2. Variants derived from these two peptide activators were used to disclose the structural determinants for receptor interaction. Removal of five amino acids from the C-terminus of PSMα2 gave rise to a peptide that had lost the receptor-independent neutrophil permeabilizing effect, whereas neutrophil activation capacity as well as its preference for FPR2 was retained. Shorter peptides, PSMα21–10 and PSMα21–5, activate neutrophils, but the receptor preference for these peptides was switched to FPR1.The fMIFL-PSM5–16 peptide, in which the N-terminus of PSMα21–16 was replaced by the sequence fMIFL, was a dual agonist for FPR1/FPR2, whereas fMIFL-PSM5–10 preferred FPR1 to FPR2. Further, an Ile residue was identified as a key determinant for interaction with FPR2. A chimeric receptor in which the cytoplasmic tail of FPR1 was replaced by the corresponding part of FPR2 lost the ability to recognize FPR1 agonists, but gained function in relation to FPR2 agonists.Taken together, our data demonstrate that the C-terminus of the PSMα2 peptide plays a critical role for its cytotoxicity, but is not essential for the receptor-mediated pro-inflammatory activity. More importantly, we show that the amino acids present in the C-terminus, which are not supposed to occupy the agonist-binding pocket in the FPRs, are of importance for the choice of receptor