Liver transplantation for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in Europe: Results of the ELITA/EF-CLIF collaborative study (ECLIS)

International audienceLiver transplantation (LT) has been proposed as an effective salvage therapy even for the sickest patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). This large collaborative study was designed to assess the current clinical practice and outcomes of patients with ACLF who are wait-listed for LT in Europe.Methods: This was a retrospective study including 308 consecutive patients with ACLF, listed in 20 centres across 8 European countries, from January 2018 to June 2019.Results: A total of 2,677 patients received a LT: 1,216 (45.4%) for decompensated cirrhosis. Of these, 234 (19.2%) had ACLF at LT: 58 (4.8%) had ACLF-1, 78 (6.4%) had ACLF-2, and 98 (8.1%) had ACLF-3. Wide variations were observed amongst countries: France and Germany had high rates of ACLF-2/3 (27-41%); Italy, Switzerland, Poland and the Netherlands had medium rates (9-15%); and the United Kingdom and Spain had low rates (3-5%) (p 4 mmol/L (hazard ratio [HR] 3.14; 95% CI 1.37-7.19), recent infection from multidrug resistant organisms (HR 3.67; 95% CI 1.63-8.28), and renal replacement therapy (HR 2.74; 95% CI 1.37-5.51) were independent predictors of post-LT mortality. During the same period, 74 patients with ACLF died on the waiting list. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 1-year survival of patients with ACLF on the LT waiting list was 73% for ACLF-1 or -2 and 50% for ACLF-3.Conclusion: The results reveal wide variations in the listing of patients with ACLF in Europe despite favourable post-LT survival. Risk factors for mortality were identified, enabling a more precise prognostic assessment of patients with ACLF

Ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with or without dasabuvir, plus ribavirin for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4 infection with cirrhosis (ABACUS): a prospective observational study

Background We ran a compassionate use nationwide programme (ABACUS) to provide access to ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with dasabuvir, plus ribavirin for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection and ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, plus ribavirin for HCV genotype 4 infection in patients with cirrhosis at high risk of decompensation while approval of these regimens was pending in Italy. Methods In this prospective observational study, we collected data from a compassionate use nationwide programme from March 17, 2014, to May 28, 2015. Patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis at high risk of decompensation were given coformulated ombitasvir (25 mg), paritaprevir (150 mg), and ritonavir (100 mg) once daily and dasabuvir (250 mg) twice daily for 12 weeks (patients with HCV genotype 1b infection) or 24 weeks (patients with HCV genotype 1a infection). Patients with HCV genotype 4 infection were given coformulated ombitasvir (25 mg), paritaprevir (150 mg), and ritonavir (100 mg) once per day for 24 weeks. All patients were given weight-based ribavirin. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response at week 12 after the end of treatment (SVR12), analysed by intention-to-treat. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify baseline characteristics associated with SVR12. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Findings 728 (96%) of 762 patients with cirrhosis who were given ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with or without dasabuvir, plus ribavirin therapy for 12 or 24 weeks achieved SVR12. Logistic regression analyses identified that bilirubin concentrations of less than 2 mg/dL were associated with SVR12 (odds ratio [OR] 4·76 [95% CI 1·83–12·3]; p=0·001). 166 (23%) of 734 patients included in safety analyses had an adverse event. 25 (3%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Asthenia was the most commonly reported adverse event, occurring in 36 (5%) patients. Interpretation Our findings suggest that the safety and effectiveness of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with or without dasabuvir, plus ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection and cirrhosis at high risk of decompensation in a real-life setting are similar to those reported in clinical trials. The concordance with clinical trials provides reassurance that the reported efficacy of this treatment in clinical trials will translate to its use in routine clinical practice. Funding Dipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica dell'Universita di Palermo

Safety and efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir plus ribavirin in patients over 65 years with HCV genotype 1 cirrhosis

none191norestrictedAscione, Antonio*; De Luca, Massimo; Melazzini, Mario; Montilla, Simona; Trotta, Maria Paola; Petta, Salvatore; Puoti, Massimo; Sangiovanni, Vincenzo; Messina, Vincenzo; Bruno, Savino; Izzi, Antonio; Villa, Erica; Aghemo, Alessio; Zignego, Anna Linda; Orlandini, Alessandra; Fontanella, Luca; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Marzioni, Marco; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Craxì, Antonio; Abbati, Giuseppe; Alberti, Alfredo; Andreone, Pietro; Andreoni, Massimo; Angeli, Paolo; Angelico, Mario; Angarano, Gioacchino; Angrisani, Debora; Antinori, Andrea; Antonini, Cinzia; Avancini, Ivo; Barone, Michele; Bruno, Raffaele; Benedetti, Antonio; Bernabucci, Veronica; Blanc, Pier; Boarini, Chiara; Boffa, Nicola; Boglione, Lucio; Borghi, Vanni; Borgia, Guglielmo; Brancaccio, Giuseppina; Brunetto, Maurizia; Cacciola, Irene; Calabrese, Paolo; Calvaruso, Vincenza; Campagnolo, Davide; Canovari, Benedetta; Caporaso, Nicola; Capra, Franco; Carolo, Giada; Cassola, Giovanni; Castelli, Francesco; Cauda, Roberto; Silberstein, Francesca Ceccherini; Cecere, Roberto; Chessa, Luchino; Chiodera, Alessandro; Chirianni, Antonio; Ciancio, Alessia; Cima, Serena; Coco, Barbara; Colombo, Massimo; Coppola, Nicola; Corti, Giampaolo; Cosco, Lucio; Corradori, Silvia; Cozzolongo, Raffaele; Cristaudo, Antonio; Danieli, Elena; Monforte, Antonella D’Arminio; Monache, Marco delle; Del Poggio, Paolo; de Luca, Andrea; Dentone, Chiara; Di Biagio, Antonio; Di Leo, Alfredo; Di Perri, Giovanni; Di Stefano, Marco; D’Offizi, Giampiero; Donato, Francesca; Durante, Emanuele; Erne, Elke; Fagiuoli, Stefano; Falasca, Katia; Federico, Alessandro; Felder, Martina; Ferrari, Carlo; Gaeta, Giovanni Battista; Ganga, Roberto; Gatti, Pietro; Giacomet, Vania; Giacometti, Andrea; Gianstefani, Alice; Giordani, Maria; Giorgini, Alessia; Grieco, Antonio; Guerra, Michele; Gulminetti, Roberto; Ieluzzi, Donatella; Imparato, Michele; Iodice, Valentina; La Monica, Silvia; Lazzarin, Adriano; Lenzi, Marco; Levrero, Massimo; Lichtner, Myriam; Lionetti, Raffaella; Guercio, Carmela Lo; Madonna, Salvatore; Magnani, Silvia; Maida, Ivana; Marignani, Massimo; Marrone, Aldo; Marsetti, Fabio; Martini, Silvia; Masarone, Mario; Maserati, Renato; Mastroianni, Claudio Maria; Memoli, Massimo; Menzaghi, Barbara; Merli, Manuela; Miele, Luca; Milella, Michele; Mondelli, Mario; Montalbano, Marzia; Monti, Monica; Morelli, Olivia; Morisco, Filomena; Nardone, Gaetano; Novara, Sergio; Onnelli, Giovanna; Onofrio, Mirella; Paganin, Simona; Pani, Luca; Parisi, Maria Rita; Parruti, Giustino; Pasquazzi, Caterina; Pasulo, Luisa; Perno, Carlo Federico; Persico, Marcello; Piai, Guido; Picciotto, Antonino; Pigozzi, Grazielle Marie; Piovesan, Sara; Piras, Maria Chiara; Pirisi, Massimo; Piscaglia, Anna Maria; Ponti, Laura; Potenza, Domenico; Pravadelli, Cecilia; Quartini, Mariano; Quirino, Tiziana; Raimondo, Giovanni; Rapaccini, Gian Ludovico; Rendina, Maria; Rizzardini, Giuliano; Rizzetto, Mario; Rizzo, Salvatore; Romagnoli, Dante; Romano, Antonietta; Rossi, Cristina; Rumi, Maria Grazia; Russello, Maurizio; Russo, Francesca Paolo; Russo, Maria Luisa; Sansonno, Domenico Ettore; Santantonio, Teresa Antonia; Saracco, Giorgio; Schimizzi, Anna Maria; Serviddio, Gaetano; Simeone, Filomena; Solinas, Attilio; Soria, Alessandro; Tabone, Marco; Taliani, Gloria; Tarantino, Giuseppe; Tarquini, Pierluigi; Tavio, Marcello; Termite, Antonio; Teti, Elisabetta; Toniutto, Pierluigi; Torti, Carlo; Tundi, Paolo; Vecchiet, Giacomo; Verucchi, Gabriella; Gentilucci, Umberto Vespasiani; Vinci, Maria; Vullo, Vincenzo; Zolfino, Teresa; Zuin, MassimoAscione, Antonio; De Luca, Massimo; Melazzini, Mario; Montilla, Simona; Trotta, Maria Paola; Petta, Salvatore; Puoti, Massimo; Sangiovanni, Vincenzo; Messina, Vincenzo; Bruno, Savino; Izzi, Antonio; Villa, Erica; Aghemo, Alessio; Zignego, Anna Linda; Orlandini, Alessandra; Fontanella, Luca; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Marzioni, Marco; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Craxì, Antonio; Abbati, Giuseppe; Alberti, Alfredo; Andreone, Pietro; Andreoni, Massimo; Angeli, Paolo; Angelico, Mario; Angarano, Gioacchino; Angrisani, Debora; Antinori, Andrea; Antonini, Cinzia; Avancini, Ivo; Barone, Michele; Bruno, Raffaele; Benedetti, Antonio; Bernabucci, Veronica; Blanc, Pier; Boarini, Chiara; Boffa, Nicola; Boglione, Lucio; Borghi, Vanni; Borgia, Guglielmo; Brancaccio, Giuseppina; Brunetto, Maurizia; Cacciola, Irene; Calabrese, Paolo; Calvaruso, Vincenza; Campagnolo, Davide; Canovari, Benedetta; Caporaso, Nicola; Capra, Franco; Carolo, Giada; Cassola, Giovanni; Castelli, Francesco; Cauda, Roberto; Silberstein, Francesca Ceccherini; Cecere, Roberto; Chessa, Luchino; Chiodera, Alessandro; Chirianni, Antonio; Ciancio, Alessia; Cima, Serena; Coco, Barbara; Colombo, Massimo; Coppola, Nicola; Corti, Giampaolo; Cosco, Lucio; Corradori, Silvia; Cozzolongo, Raffaele; Cristaudo, Antonio; Danieli, Elena; Monforte, Antonella D’Arminio; Monache, Marco delle; Del Poggio, Paolo; de Luca, Andrea; Dentone, Chiara; Di Biagio, Antonio; Di Leo, Alfredo; Di Perri, Giovanni; DI STEFANO, Marco; D’Offizi, Giampiero; Donato, Francesca; Durante, Emanuele; Erne, Elke; Fagiuoli, Stefano; Falasca, Katia; Federico, Alessandro; Felder, Martina; Ferrari, Carlo; Gaeta, Giovanni Battista; Ganga, Roberto; Gatti, Pietro; Giacomet, Vania; Giacometti, Andrea; Gianstefani, Alice; Giordani, Maria; Giorgini, Alessia; Grieco, Antonio; Guerra, Michele; Gulminetti, Roberto; Ieluzzi, Donatella; Imparato, Michele; Iodice, Valentina; La Monica, Silvia; Lazzarin, Adriano; Lenzi, Marco; Levrero, Massimo; Lichtner, Myriam; Lionetti, Raffaella; Guercio, Carmela Lo; Madonna, Salvatore; Magnani, Silvia; Maida, Ivana; Marignani, Massimo; Marrone, Aldo; Marsetti, Fabio; Martini, Silvia; Masarone, Mario; Maserati, Renato; Mastroianni, Claudio Maria; Memoli, Massimo; Menzaghi, Barbara; Merli, Manuela; Miele, Luca; Milella, Michele; Mondelli, Mario; Montalbano, Marzia; Monti, Monica; Morelli, Olivia; Morisco, Filomena; Nardone, Gaetano; Novara, Sergio; Onnelli, Giovanna; Onofrio, Mirella; Paganin, Simona; Pani, Luca; Parisi, Maria Rita; Parruti, Giustino; Pasquazzi, Caterina; Pasulo, Luisa; Perno, Carlo Federico; Persico, Marcello; Piai, Guido; Picciotto, Antonino; Pigozzi, Grazielle Marie; Piovesan, Sara; Piras, Maria Chiara; Pirisi, Massimo; Piscaglia, Anna Maria; Ponti, Laura; Potenza, Domenico; Pravadelli, Cecilia; Quartini, Mariano; Quirino, Tiziana; Raimondo, Giovanni; Rapaccini, Gian Ludovico; Rendina, Maria; Rizzardini, Giuliano; Rizzetto, Mario; Rizzo, Salvatore; Romagnoli, Dante; Romano, Antonietta; Rossi, Cristina; Rumi, Maria Grazia; Russello, Maurizio; Russo, Francesca Paolo; Russo, Maria Luisa; Sansonno, Domenico Ettore; Santantonio, Teresa Antonia; Saracco, Giorgio; Schimizzi, Anna Maria; Serviddio, Gaetano; Simeone, Filomena; Solinas, Attilio; Soria, Alessandro; Tabone, Marco; Taliani, Gloria; Tarantino, Giuseppe; Tarquini, Pierluigi; Tavio, Marcello; Termite, Antonio; Teti, Elisabetta; Toniutto, Pierluigi; Torti, Carlo; Tundi, Paolo; Vecchiet, Giacomo; Verucchi, Gabriella; Gentilucci, Umberto Vespasiani; Vinci, Maria; Vullo, Vincenzo; Zolfino, Teresa; Zuin, Massim

Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The single-arm TOCIVID-19 prospective trial

BackgroundTocilizumab blocks pro-inflammatory activity of interleukin-6 (IL-6), involved in pathogenesis of pneumonia the most frequent cause of death in COVID-19 patients.MethodsA multicenter, single-arm, hypothesis-driven trial was planned, according to a phase 2 design, to study the effect of tocilizumab on lethality rates at 14 and 30 days (co-primary endpoints, a priori expected rates being 20 and 35%, respectively). A further prospective cohort of patients, consecutively enrolled after the first cohort was accomplished, was used as a secondary validation dataset. The two cohorts were evaluated jointly in an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model to assess prognostic variables on survival.ResultsIn the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) phase 2 population, 180/301 (59.8%) subjects received tocilizumab, and 67 deaths were observed overall. Lethality rates were equal to 18.4% (97.5% CI: 13.6-24.0, P=0.52) and 22.4% (97.5% CI: 17.2-28.3, P<0.001) at 14 and 30 days, respectively. Lethality rates were lower in the validation dataset, that included 920 patients. No signal of specific drug toxicity was reported. In the exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio negatively affected survival, while the concurrent use of steroids was associated with greater survival. A statistically significant interaction was found between tocilizumab and respiratory support, suggesting that tocilizumab might be more effective in patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline.ConclusionsTocilizumab reduced lethality rate at 30 days compared with null hypothesis, without significant toxicity. Possibly, this effect could be limited to patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline.Registration EudraCT (2020-001110-38); clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04317092)

The COVID - AGICT study: COVID–19 and advanced gastro-intestinal cancer surgical treatment. A multicentric Italian study on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impact on gastro-intestinal cancers surgical treatment during the 2020. Analysis of perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes

Background This Italian multicentric retrospective study aimed to investigate the possible changes in outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method Our primary endpoint was to determine whether the pandemic scenario increased the rate of patients with colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers resected at an advanced stage in 2020 compared to 2019. Considering different cancer staging systems, we divided tumors into early stages and advanced stages, using pathological outcomes. Furthermore, to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical outcomes, perioperative data of both 2020 and 2019 were also examined. Results Overall, a total of 8250 patients, 4370 (53%) and 3880 (47%) were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 respectively, in 62 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (P = 0.25). Nevertheless, the analysis of quarters revealed that in the second half of 2020 the rate of advanced cancer resected, tented to be higher compared with the same months of 2019 (P = 0.05). During the pandemic year ‘Charlson Comorbidity Index score of cancer patients (5.38 ± 2.08 vs 5.28 ± 2.22, P = 0.036), neoadjuvant treatments (23.9% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), rate of urgent diagnosis (24.2% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001), colorectal cancer urgent resection (9.4% vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and the rate of positive nodes on the total nodes resected per surgery increased significantly (7 vs 9% - 2.02 ± 4.21 vs 2.39 ± 5.23, P < 0.001). Conclusions Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not influence the pathological stage of colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers at the time of surgery, our study revealed that the pandemic scenario negatively impacted on several perioperative and post-operative outcomes

The MIS-COVID-AGICT Study: Trend of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment During the First Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy. Subgroup Analysis from the COVID-AGICT Study: COVID-19 and Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgical Treatment

Background: A preliminary analysis from the COVID-Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgical Treatment (AGICT) study showed that the rate of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for elective and urgent procedures did not decrease during the pandemic year. In this article, we aimed to perform a subgroup analysis using data from the COVID-AGICT study to evaluate the trend of MIS during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Italy.Methods: This study was conducted collecting data of MIS patients from the COVID-AGICT database. The primary endpoint was to demonstrate whether the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic scenario reduced MIS for elective treatment of gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) in Italy in 2020. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic period on perioperative outcomes in the MIS group.Results: In the pandemic year, 62% of patients underwent surgery with a minimally invasive approach, compared to 63% in 2019 (P = .23). In 2020, the proportion of patients undergoing elective MIS decreased compared to the previous year (80% versus 82%, P = .04), and the rate of urgent MIS did not differ between the 2 years (31% and 33% in 2019 and 2020 - P = .66). Colorectal cancer was less likely to be treated with MIS approach during 2020 (78% versus 75%, P < .001). Conversely, the rate of MIS pancreatic resection was higher in 2020 (28% versus 22%, P < .002). Conversion to an open approach was lower in 2020 (7.2% versus 9.2% - P = .01). Major postoperative complications were similar in both years (11% versus 11%, P = .9).Conclusion: In conclusion, although MIS for elective treatment of GIC in Italy was reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic period, our study revealed that the overall proportion of MIS (elective and urgent) and postoperative outcomes were comparable to the prepandemic period

The pan - COVID - AGICT study. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on surgically treated pancreatic cancer patients. A multicentric Italian study

Background: In this article we aimed to perform a subgroup analysis using data from the COVID-AGICT study, to investigate the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancers (PC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The primary endpoint of the study was to find out any difference in the tumoral stage of surgically treated PC patients between 2019 and 2020. Surgical and oncological outcomes of the entire cohort of patients were also appraised dividing the entire peri-pandemic period into six three-month timeframes to balance out the comparison between 2019 and 2020. Results: Overall, a total of 1815 patients were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 in 14 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (p = 0.846). During the pandemic, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has dropped significantly (6.2% vs 21.4%, p < 0.001) and, for patients who didn't undergo NCT, the latency between diagnosis and surgery was shortened (49.58 +/- 37 days vs 77.40 +/- 83 days, p < 0.001). During 2020 there was a significant increase in minimally invasive procedures (p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative complication was the same in the two years but during 2020 there was an increase of the medical ones (19% vs 16.1%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The post-pandemic dramatic modifications in healthcare provision, in Italy, did not significantly impair the clinical history of PC patients receiving surgical resection. The present study is one of the largest reports available on the argument and may provide the basis for long-term analyses

The pan - COVID - AGICT study. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on surgically treated pancreatic cancer patients. A multicentric Italian study

Background: In this article we aimed to perform a subgroup analysis using data from the COVID-AGICT study, to investigate the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancers (PC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The primary endpoint of the study was to find out any difference in the tumoral stage of surgically treated PC patients between 2019 and 2020. Surgical and oncological outcomes of the entire cohort of patients were also appraised dividing the entire peri-pandemic period into six three-month timeframes to balance out the comparison between 2019 and 2020. Results: Overall, a total of 1815 patients were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 in 14 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (p = 0.846). During the pandemic, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has dropped significantly (6.2% vs 21.4%, p < 0.001) and, for patients who didn't undergo NCT, the latency between diagnosis and surgery was shortened (49.58 ± 37 days vs 77.40 ± 83 days, p < 0.001). During 2020 there was a significant increase in minimally invasive procedures (p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative complication was the same in the two years but during 2020 there was an increase of the medical ones (19% vs 16.1%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The post-pandemic dramatic modifications in healthcare provision, in Italy, did not significantly impair the clinical history of PC patients receiving surgical resection. The present study is one of the largest reports available on the argument and may provide the basis for long-term analyses