Smoking exposure, loss of forced expiratory volume in one second and the risk of lung cancer among patients with malignant disease who present with cardiac or pulmonary symptoms: a cross-sectional study

Introduction Smokers with airway obstruction are at a higher risk of lung cancer than smokers without airway obstruction. Inflammation plays a key role in lung carcinogenesis. This single-center study prospectively assessed (i) the relationship between smoking exposure and the loss of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in determining lung cancer risk and (ii) the effect of lung cancer on systemic inflammation. Material and Methods The study group comprised 475 consecutively enrolled patients with cancer who presented with pulmonary or cardiac symptoms. The effects of smoking exposure and FEV1 loss on the predicted lung cancer risk were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. C-reactive protein (CRP) was used as a marker of inflammation. Results The prevalence of lung cancer was 0.23. The lung cancer risk increased with the number of pack years and FEV1 loss (p < 0.01). Moving from the 5th (−22% of the predicted value) to the 95th percentile of FEV1 loss (56% of the predicted value) increased lung cancer risk from 0.07 to 0.23 (Δ = 0.16) at 0 pack years and from 0.39 to 0.73 (Δ = 0.34) at 70 pack years (95th percentile). The values for Δ peaked at 61 pack years (0.34) and then decreased with a further increase in smoking exposure, without reaching the zero mark. Patients with lung cancer were more likely to have a CRP level above the median (4.05 mg/L) than patients with other cancers (adjusted odds ratio = 2.67). Conclusions Systemic inflammation is more pronounced in patients with lung cancer than in patients with other cancers. The effect of FEV1 loss on the patients’ predicted risks of lung cancer increases with increasing smoking exposure. Measurements of FEV1 loss are useful to identify patients facing an increased risk of developing lung cancer

Elevated Levels of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients with Chronic Dyspnea and Moderate Renal Dysfunction: Decreased Clearance or Increased Cardiac Stress?

Background/Aims: Serum levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are often increased in patients with impaired renal function. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the increase in NT-proBNP is predominantly due to a reduced renal clearance or an increased cardiac secretion. Methods: A series of 697 outpatients (age: 57.5 ± 16.4 years) referred for evaluation of dyspnea were assigned to 4 groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2)]: group 1, eGFR <60 (n = 77); group 2, eGFR ≧60 to <75 (n = 139); group 3, eGFR ≧75 to <90 (n = 191), and group 4, eGFR ≧90 (n = 289). The patients were also grouped into 2 categories based on the presence (n = 176) or absence (n = 521) of heart disease. Results: In patients with heart disease, the adjusted values for NT-proBNP were higher in eGFR group 1 than in eGFR groups 2–4 (p ≤ 0.01). In patients without heart disease, eGFR group 1 membership had no effect on NT-proBNP. Conclusion: A reduced renal clearance does not explain increased NT-proBNP levels in patients with moderate renal impairment and dyspnea. Our data suggest that a moderate reduction in renal function places additional stress on the heart in patients with established cardiac disease. © In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0

Cardiotoxicity and Cancer Therapy: Treatment-Related Cardiac Morbidity in Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Heart or Lung Disease

Objectives: Cardiac injury is one of the complications of cancer treatment. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between the types of radiotherapy of the chest (RT), chemotherapy (CT), cancer surgery (CS) and endocrine therapy (ET), and the presence of heart disease, and their associations with the serum level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Methods: A consecutive series of 374 patients with cancer who were referred because of symptoms suggestive of heart or lung disease prospectively underwent a diagnostic workup. Results: The prevalence of heart disease was 36.9%. RT administered before 1995 (n = 19) was associated with both increased odds of heart disease [adjusted odds ratio 10.3, 95% confidence interval 3.1-34.0] and higher ln-transformed NT-proBNP values (p < 0.01) compared to the control group (no RT or RT for right-sided breast cancer from 1995 onwards; n = 311). Anthracycline-treated patients (n = 54) had higher adjusted values for ln(NT-proBNP) compared to the control group (no CT; n = 243; p < 0.01) but no increased odds of heart disease. Conclusions: While pre-1995 RT and anthracycline-containing CT were associated with cardiac effects, there was no evidence that RT using modern cardioprotective techniques, CT in the absence of anthracyclines, CS or ET had detrimental effects on the heart. © In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0