4 research outputs found

    The Role of Alveolar Macrophages in Pulmonary Inflammation After Intoxication and Burn Injury

    Get PDF
    A positive blood alcohol concentration is detected in nearly half of burn patients admitted to the emergency room. The combined insult of being intoxicated at the time of burn injury results in more clinical complications, in comparison to non-intoxicated burn patients. Severe burn, with or without inhalation injury, is a common predisposing factor for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Exacerbated pulmonary inflammation and a net result of insufficient gas exchange underlie the large percentage of burn fatalities due to pulmonary complications. Previous studies in our laboratory indicate a drastic elevation in pulmonary inflammation in a mouse model of intoxication and burn injury, characterized by heightened levels of alveolar wall thickening, neutrophil accumulation, neutrophil chemokines KC and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2), and pro-inflammatory IL-6. Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are the lungs first line of defense against inhaled particles or pathogens and elegantly coordinate the on-set and resolution of inflammation. Importantly, AM efferocytosis of apoptotic cells stimulates anti-inflammatory mediator release and promotes the resolution of inflammatory responses, while a disruption in this function can result in drastically increased levels of inflammation. A common feature of both ARDS and burn injury is an increase in apoptosis in lung tissue. Since the removal of apoptotic cells by AMs is important for the termination of inflammation, a dysregulation in the activation state or survival of AMs can result in prolonged pulmonary inflammation. Thus, the role of AMs in pulmonary inflammation after intoxication and injury is extremely important. With this knowledge, we hypothesize that intoxication at the time of burn injury leads to an increase in AM apoptosis, resulting in exacerbated pulmonary inflammation and impaired lung function. To test this hypothesis, three aims are proposed: 1) to determine if pulmonary inflammation after intoxication and burn injury affects physiological parameters of lung function, 2) identify the role of alveolar macrophages in post-burn pulmonary inflammation, and 3) to determine if exogenous mesenchymal stem cell treatment will attenuate pulmonary inflammation after intoxication and burn injury

    A randomized clinical trial of high-dosage coenzyme Q10 in early Parkinson disease: no evidence of benefit

    No full text
    Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), an antioxidant that supports mitochondrial function, has been shown in preclinical Parkinson disease (PD) models to reduce the loss of dopamine neurons, and was safe and well tolerated in early-phase human studies. A previous phase II study suggested possible clinical benefit. To examine whether CoQ10 could slow disease progression in early PD. A phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial at 67 North American sites consisting of participants 30 years of age or older who received a diagnosis of PD within 5 years and who had the following inclusion criteria: the presence of a rest tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity; a modified Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2.5 or less; and no anticipated need for dopaminergic therapy within 3 months. Exclusion criteria included the use of any PD medication within 60 days, the use of any symptomatic PD medication for more than 90 days, atypical or drug-induced parkinsonism, a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) rest tremor score of 3 or greater for any limb, a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 25 or less, a history of stroke, the use of certain supplements, and substantial recent exposure to CoQ10. Of 696 participants screened, 78 were found to be ineligible, and 18 declined participation. The remaining 600 participants were randomly assigned to receive placebo, 1200 mg/d of CoQ10, or 2400 mg/d of CoQ10; all participants received 1200 IU/d of vitamin E. Participants were observed for 16 months or until a disability requiring dopaminergic treatment. The prospectively defined primary outcome measure was the change in total UPDRS score (Parts I-III) from baseline to final visit. The study was powered to detect a 3-point difference between an active treatment and placebo. The baseline characteristics of the participants were well balanced, the mean age was 62.5 years, 66% of participants were male, and the mean baseline total UPDRS score was 22.7. A total of 267 participants required treatment (94 received placebo, 87 received 1200 mg/d of CoQ10, and 86 received 2400 mg/d of CoQ10), and 65 participants (29 who received placebo, 19 who received 1200 mg/d of CoQ10, and 17 who received 2400 mg/d of CoQ10) withdrew prematurely. Treatments were well tolerated with no safety concerns. The study was terminated after a prespecified futility criterion was reached. At study termination, both active treatment groups showed slight adverse trends relative to placebo. Adjusted mean changes (worsening) in total UPDRS scores from baseline to final visit were 6.9 points (placebo), 7.5 points (1200 mg/d of CoQ10; P = .49 relative to placebo), and 8.0 points (2400 mg/d of CoQ10; P = .21 relative to placebo). Coenzyme Q10 was safe and well tolerated in this population, but showed no evidence of clinical benefit. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00740714
    corecore