5 research outputs found
Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine–Borane Catalyzed by Half-Sandwich Ir and Rh Complexes: Mechanism and the Role of Cp* Noninnocence
Half-sandwich Cp*Rh<sup>III</sup> complexes (Cp* = η<sup>5</sup>-1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)
supported by 2,2′-bipyridine
or 4,4′-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine
catalyze dehydrogenation of dimethylamine–borane (Me<sub>2</sub>NH·BH<sub>3</sub>) to produce H<sub>2</sub> and dimethylamino–borane
dimer (Me<sub>2</sub>Nî—¸BH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub> with turnovers
of 2200. The Ir<sup>III</sup> analogues, on the other hand, display
dramatically poorer catalytic activity. Mechanistic inferences drawn
from stoichiometric reactions and DFT calculations suggest noninnocent
involvement of the Cp* moiety as a proton shuttle
Facile Styrene Formation from Ethylene and a Phenylplatinum(II) Complex Leading to an Observable Platinum(II) Hydride
A new
2-(di-<i>tert</i>-butylphosphanyl)Âbenzenesulfonate-supported
phenylplatinumÂ(II) complex instantaneously but reversibly binds ethylene
at room temperature. Direct and rapid styrene formation at room temperature
via insertion of the Pt<sup>II</sup>-bound ethylene into the Pt<sup>II</sup>–Ph fragment followed by β-hydride elimination
results in the formation of a solution-stable Pt<sup>II</sup>–H
complex. The Pt<sup>II</sup>–H fragment is resistant toward
protonolysis by acetic acid. Oxidation of the Pt<sup>II</sup>–H
fragment by excess Cu<sup>II</sup>(OTf)<sub>2</sub> leads to an inorganic
Pt<sup>II</sup> complex incapable of C–H activation
Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine–Borane Catalyzed by Half-Sandwich Ir and Rh Complexes: Mechanism and the Role of Cp* Noninnocence
Half-sandwich Cp*Rh<sup>III</sup> complexes (Cp* = η<sup>5</sup>-1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)
supported by 2,2′-bipyridine
or 4,4′-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine
catalyze dehydrogenation of dimethylamine–borane (Me<sub>2</sub>NH·BH<sub>3</sub>) to produce H<sub>2</sub> and dimethylamino–borane
dimer (Me<sub>2</sub>Nî—¸BH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub> with turnovers
of 2200. The Ir<sup>III</sup> analogues, on the other hand, display
dramatically poorer catalytic activity. Mechanistic inferences drawn
from stoichiometric reactions and DFT calculations suggest noninnocent
involvement of the Cp* moiety as a proton shuttle
Exclusive Csp<sup>3</sup>–Csp<sup>3</sup> vs Csp<sup>2</sup>–Csp<sup>3</sup> Reductive Elimination from Pt<sup>IV</sup> Governed by Ligand Constraints
Selective
reductive elimination of ethane (Csp<sup>3</sup>-Csp<sup>3</sup> RE)
was observed following bromide abstraction and subsequent
thermolysis of a Pt<sup>IV</sup> complex bearing both Csp<sup>3</sup>- and Csp<sup>2</sup>-hybridized hydrocarbyl ligands. Through a comparative
experimental and theoretical study with two other Pt<sup>IV</sup> complexes
featuring greater conformational flexibility of the ligand scaffold,
we show that the rigidity of a meridionally coordinating ligand raises
the barrier for Csp<sup>2</sup>-Csp<sup>3</sup> RE, resulting in unprecedented
reactivity
Concurrent B‑to-Pt Methyl Migration and B‑Center Retention in Aerobic Oxidation of Methylborato Platinum(II) Complexes
A new anionic methoxy methylbisÂ(2-pyridyl)Âborate
ligand enables
facile oxidation of the derived dimethylplatinumÂ(II) complex, <b>10</b>, with O<sub>2</sub> in methanol to produce a mixture of
two platinumÂ(IV) complexes in combined quantitative yield, one supported
by a modified ligand, dimethoxybisÂ(2-pyridyl)Âborate, and the second
supported by the original methoxy methylbisÂ(2-pyridyl)Âborate. The
former product results from the aerobic Pt<sup>II</sup>-to-Pt<sup>IV</sup> oxidation and B-to-Pt<sup>IV</sup> methyl migration with
subsequent bridging of the boron and Pt<sup>IV</sup> centers by a
methoxy group derived from the solvent. A similar reactivity was also
demonstrated for <b>11</b>, the methyl methoxo platinumÂ(II)
analogue of <b>10</b>. Factors responsible for the product distribution
are discussed