Marital Conflict and Early Adolescents' Self-Evaluation: The Role of Parenting Quality and Early Adolescents' Appraisals

Cognitive appraisals and family dynamics have been identified as mediators of the relationship between marital conflict and children's adjustment. Surprisingly little research has investigated both meditational processes in the same study. Guided by the cognitive-contextual framework and the spillover hypothesis, the present study integrated factors from both theories early adolescents' appraisals of threat and self-blame, as well as perceived parenting quality as mediators of the link between early adolescents' perception of marital conflict and their self-evaluations (self-esteem and scholastic competence). Analyses were based on the first two waves of an ongoing longitudinal study. Participants were 176 two-parent families, and their early adolescents (50.5% girls) whose mean age was 10.61years at Time 1 (SD=0.40) and 11.63years at Time 2 (SD=0.39). Structural equation modeling analyses indicated that parenting quality and early adolescents' perceived threat provided indirect pathways between marital conflict and early adolescents' self-esteem 1year later when controlling for their initial level of self-esteem. With respect to scholastic competence, only fathers' parenting was an indirect link. Self-blame did not play a role. Implications for understanding the mechanisms by which exposure to marital conflict predicts early adolescents' maladjustment are discusse

Perceived Interparental Conflict and Early Adolescents' Friendships: The Role of Attachment Security and Emotion Regulation

Although there is strong evidence for the effect of interparental conflict on adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems, little is known about the effect on the quality of adolescents' relationships. The current study investigates the link between adolescents' friendships and interparental conflict as reported by both parents and adolescents. It considers early adolescents' emotion regulation ability and attachment security as mediators. The analysis is based on a longitudinal study with two waves separated by 12months. The participants were 180 two-parent families and their adolescent children (50.5% girls), the average age of the latter being 10.61years (SD=0.41) at the outset (Time 1). Binomial logistic regression analysis revealed that perceived interparental conflict increased the risk of instability in friendship relationships across the 1-year period. Structural equation modeling analysis indicated that the association between perceived interparental conflict and friendship quality was mediated by emotion regulation and attachment security. The discussion focuses on mechanisms whereby interparental conflict influences early adolescents' friendship relationship

Measuring sense of indebtedness in second-generation immigrants in Switzerland

Sense of indebtedness toward parents (SIP) refers to feelings of debt to give back to parents for their migration-related sacrifices in second-generation immigrants. Based on Kang (2010), we developed a German SIP scale to measure these feelings. The purpose of this study was threefold: (1) to provide evidence of the theoretical factor structure underlying SIP, (2) to test SIP’s measurement invariance in four immigrant groups, and (3) to shed light on the validity of SIP. The sample included N = 492 second-generation immigrants (66% female, Mage = 32.39, SDage = 10.46) in Switzerland. The results showed good reliability, confirmed the theoretical one-factor model, and supported partial scalar invariance across four immigrant groups. Further analysis provided evidence for the SIP’s discriminant and incremental validity. The measure Sense of Indebtedness Toward Parents is a valuable contribution to the ongoing research on intergenerational relations in immigrant families

Systematic review about data quality and protocol compliance in clinical trials

Bei Investigator Initiated Trials (IITs) werden alternative risikoadaptierte Monitoring-Strategien in Abhängigkeit vom individuellen Studiendesign und dem Risikoprofil diskutiert, um bei oft restriktiven Ressourcen eine den gesetzlichen Vorgaben genügende Qualität der Studiendurchführung und der Daten zu gewährleisten. Aufgrund einer Literaturanalyse sollten in der vorliegenden Arbeit Untersuchungen ausgewertet werden, in denen quantitative Aussagen zu Datenqualität und Prüfplan-Compliance in klinischen Prüfungen gemacht wurden. Bei der Interpretation der Ergebnisse sollten die implementierten Qualitätssicherungsmaßnahmen berücksichtigt werden. Aufgrund einer systematischen Recherche in MEDLINE konnten 21 Publikationen identifiziert werden, bei denen die Daten- und Prozessqualität in klinischen Prüfungen untersucht, die Qualität durch Überprüfungen mit Source Data Verification vor Ort oder Überprüfung übermittelter Quelldaten in der Studienzentrale ermittelt wurde und quantitative Informationen zu den Bereichen Datenqualität, Protokoll-Compliance oder Defizite bei Einwilligungserklärungen vorlagen. Die Mehrzahl der Untersuchungen ist drei Organisationen zuzuordnen: European Organization für Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) (n=7), National Cancer Institute (NCI) (n=7) und Untersuchungen der Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) (n=4). Darüber hinaus wurden drei Untersuchungen weiterer Studiengruppen identifiziert. Die Untersuchungen wurden im Zeitraum von 1981 bis 2003 publiziert. Überwiegend wurden in der Literatur onkologische Studien betrachtet (n=19), wobei die Radiotherapie im Vordergrund stand (n=8). Für die EORTC-Studien wurde in der Regel eine gute Datenqualität berichtet (80-90% korrekte Daten). Punktuelle Probleme wurden im Hinblick auf die Protokoll-Compliance und das Berichten von Nebenwirkungen/schwerwiegenden unerwünschten Ereignissen festgestellt. Eine gute Qualität wurde ebenfalls bzgl. des korrekten Einschlusses von Patienten beobachtet. Durch das NCI wurde ein standardisiertes Audit-System eingeführt und innerhalb von kooperativen Studiengruppen implementiert. Im Rahmen dieser Audits wurden verschiedene Kriterien überprüft und eine überwiegend gute Datenqualität und Protokoll-Compliance festgestellt. Mängel wurden in ca. 5% der Fälle im Hinblick auf die Einwilligungserklärung, die korrekte Anwendung der Einschlusskriterien, Protokollverletzungen, bei der Ermittlung des Zielkriteriums, der Erfassung der Toxizität, der adäquaten Datenlieferung und bei der Datenverifikation beobachtet. In einzelnen Untersuchungen ergaben sich Probleme mit der Behandlungscompliance (10-20%), bei Protokollabweichungen im Hinblick auf die Arzneimitteldosis (10%) und bei der Drug Accountability (15%). Von der TROG wurde ein Qualitätssicherungsprozess implementiert, der auf zentralem Monitoring von kopierten Quelldaten basiert. Durch den Qualitätssicherungsansatz der TROG konnten schwerwiegende Probleme mit der Protokoll-Compliance unter 10% gesenkt werden, ebenso konnte eine gute Datenqualität mit einer Fehlerrate unter 5% erreicht werden. Die korrekte Handhabung von Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien stellte in Einzelfällen ein Problem dar. Zusammenfassend kann festgestellt werden, dass die in dem Review erfassten Studiengruppen von einer guten Datenqualität und einer guten bis moderaten Protokoll-Compliance berichten. Diese basiert nach Aussage der Autoren im wesentlichen auf etablierten Qualitätssicherungs-Prozeduren, wobei das durchgeführte Audit ebenfalls einen potentiellen Einflussfaktor darstellt. Geringe Probleme wurden in der Regel im Hinblick auf die Einwilligungserklärung, die korrekte Handhabung der Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien und die Datenqualität beobachtet. In einzelnen Studien gab es jedoch Probleme mit der Protokoll-Compliance. Insgesamt hängen Anzahl und Art der Mängel von dem Studientyp, dem Qualitätsmanagement und der Organisation der Studiengruppe ab. Wissenschaftsbetrug wurde nur in sehr wenigen Fällen durch die Audits festgestellt. Die vorgelegten Informationen beziehen sich nahezu ausschließlich auf etablierte Studiengruppen; bezüglich Datenqualität und Protokoll-Compliance außerhalb der Studiengruppen liegen kaum Informationen in der Literatur vor. Bei der Bewertung der Ergebnisse sollte berücksichtigt werden, dass es sich zum Teil um Eigenauswertungen der Studiengruppen und nicht um unabhängige externe Prüfungen (z.B. externe Audits) handelt. Inwieweit die Ergebnisse einer konsequenten Überprüfung nach derzeitigen Good Clinical Practice (GCP) – Regeln standhalten würden, kann aus der Analyse nicht beantwortet werden. Aus der vorliegenden Literaturanalyse ergeben sich Konsequenzen für die Planung einer prospektiven kontrollierten Studie zum Vergleich unterschiedlicher Monitoring-Strategien. Wesentlicher Einflussfaktor für die Datenqualität und Protokollcompliance in einer klinischen Studie ist das Qualitätsmanagement. Dieses Qualitätsmanagement umfasst neben Monitoring zahlreiche andere Maßnahmen. Um zu einer Bewertung von Monitoringstrategien kommen zu können, müssen daher alle Qualitätssicherungsmaßnahmen im Rahmen einer Studie berücksichtigt werden. Für den Vergleich unterschiedlicher Monitoringstrategien sind geeignete Zielparameter zu definieren (z.B. schwerwiegende Defizite bzgl. Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien, Sicherheit). Die vorliegende Analyse ergibt, dass bei gutem Qualitätsmanagement ohne umfassendes vor Ort Monitoring schwerwiegende Fehler nur mit relativ niedriger Häufigkeit festgestellt wurden. Unterschiede zwischen Monitoringstrategien könnten, gegeben ein funktionierendes Qualitätsmanagementssystem, sich als quantitativ gering erweisen. Testet man auf Äquivalenz von Monitoringstrategien, sind nur niedrige Differenzen zu akzeptieren, was wiederum eine Auswirkung auf die Fallzahlplanung hat. Weiterhin muss berücksichtigt werden, dass zur Feststellung der Auswirkung unterschiedlicher Monitoringstrategien auf die Sicherheit der Patienten und die Validität der Daten im Rahmen einer kontrollierten Untersuchung ein unabhängiges Audit notwendig ist. Dabei ist zu berücksichtigen, dass ein Audit bereits einen möglichen Einflussfaktor für die Datenqualität und Protokoll-Compliance darstellen kann, und damit eine Bewertung des Nutzens einer Monitoringstrategie erschwert werden könnte. Schlüsselwörter: systematisches Review, Datenqualität, Protokoll-Compliance, klinische StudieFor Investigator Initiated Trials (IITs) alternative risk-adapted monitoring strategies are discussed in order to fulfill rules and regulations, taking into consideration the restricted resources. In this systematic review investigations, presenting quantitative data about data quality and protocol compliance in clinical trials, are analyzed. The results are discussed taking into account the quality assurance procedures implemented. Based on a systematic MEDLINE retrieval, 21 studies could be identified in which data and process quality in clinical trials were investigated and assessed by site visits with source data verification or review of copied source data in the study center and quantitative information about data quality and protocol compliance was available. The majority of investigations were performed by three organizations: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) (n=7), National Cancer Institute (NCI) (n=7) and investigations of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) (n=4). In addition three investigations of other study groups were identified. The investigations were published between 1981 and 2003. In the majority of cases oncological trials were investigated (n=19) with a focus on radiotherapy trials (n=8). In the EORTC-trials an overall good data quality was assessed (80–90% correct data). Singular problems were found with respect to protocol compliance and reporting of adverse reactions and serious unexpected events. Good quality was also observed with respect to the correct inclusion of patients into trials. By the NCI a standardized audit system was introduced and implemented within cooperative study groups. In the context of these audits different criteria were assessed and a good data quality and protocol compliance were measured. Deficits occurred in about 5% of the cases with respect to informed consent, correct application of inclusion criteria, protocol compliance, assessment of outcome criteria, assessment of toxicity, adequate data reporting and data verification. In some investigations problems with treatment compliance (10-20%), drug dose deviations (10%) and drug accountability (15%) were identified. By the TROG a quality assurance procedure was implemented, based on central monitoring of copied source data. By this approach major problems with protocol compliance could be reduced to less than 10% together with a good data quality with an error rate under 5%. The correct handling of in- and exclusion criteria was a problem in individual cases. In summary we found out that good data quality and good to moderate protocol compliance were reported by the study groups that are included in the systematic review. Due to the authors this is mainly due to an established quality assurance system, taking into consideration that audits itself may be an influential factor. Generally, minor problems were observed with respect to informed consent, correct handling of in- and exclusion criteria and data quality, however, in some studies there were problems with protocol compliance. Overall, number and type of deficits depend on study type, quality management and organization of the study group. Fraud was detected only in very few cases. The available evidence refers mainly to established study groups; for data quality and protocol compliance outside these groups only few information is available. However, it should be taken into consideration, that the analysis was performed, at least partly, by the study groups themselves and is not based on independent audits (e.g. external audits). The analysis cannot answer the question whether the results would have been replicable if a strict review according to criteria of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) would have been performed. From the systematic review consequences have to be taken for planning a prospective controlled trial comparing different monitoring strategies. The main influence factor for data quality and protocol compliance in a clinical trial is the quality management system. Quality management covers several other measures apart from monitoring. In order to assess monitoring strategies, all quality assurance procedures within a clinical trial have to be taken into consideration. For the comparison of different monitoring strategies adequate outcome parameter have to be defined (e.g. severe deficits with respect to inclusion and exclusion criteria, safety). The analysis indicates that with good quality management and no extensive on-site monitoring severe errors were detected only at relative low frequency. It could well be that with an efficient quality management system differences between monitoring strategies would be small. In order to demonstrate statistical equivalence of monitoring strategies, only small differences can be accepted which again leads to consequences for the sample-size calculation. In addition, it must be taken into consideration that within a controlled trial an independent audit is necessary to assess the effect of different monitoring strategies on the safety of patients and the quality of data. Audits however may be a possible influence factor for data quality and protocol compliance and may complicate the evaluation of the benefit of a monitoring strategy. Keywords: systematic review, data quality, protocol compliance, clinical tria

Risk of piperacillin‐induced hemolytic anemia in patients with cystic fibrosis and antipseudomonal treatment: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) is a rare but severe side effect caused by numerous drugs. Case reports and case series suggest that piperacillin-related DIIHA may be more common among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, the prevalence is speculative. The aim of this prospective, observational study was determine the prevalence of DIIHA in such affected patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with CF hospitalized for parenteral antibiotic therapy at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, who had previously been exposed to IV antibiotics, were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on Days 3 and 12 of antibiotic treatment courses. Serological studies were performed using standard techniques with gel cards. Screening for drug-dependent antibodies (ddab) was performed in the presence of the drugs and their urinary metabolites. RESULTS A total of 52 parenteral antibiotic cycles in 43 patients were investigated. Ddab against piperacillin were detected in two patients (4.7%). The direct AHG was positive with anti-IgG only in both patients. However only one of these patients developed mild immune hemolytic anemia. Both patients had been repeatedly treated with piperacillin without any evident hemolysis. There was no correlation between the exposure to piperacillin and the prevalence of ddab. CONCLUSION: Our prospective study indicates that piperacillin-induced ddab occur more frequently in patients with CF than previously suggested. The question related to the significance of piperacillin-dependent antibodies may reflect new aspects in this field

Perceived interparental conflict and early adolescents' friendships : the role of attachment security and emotion regulation

Erworben im Rahmen der Schweizer Nationallizenzen (http://www.nationallizenzen.ch)Although there is strong evidence for the effect of interparental conflict on adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems, little is known about the effect on the quality of adolescents’ relationships. The current study investigates the link between adolescents’ friendships and interparental conflict as reported by both parents and adolescents. It considers early adolescents’ emotion regulation ability and attachment security as mediators. The analysis is based on a longitudinal study with two waves separated by 12 months. The participants were 180 two-parent families and their adolescent children (50.5% girls), the average age of the latter being 10.61 years (SD = 0.41) at the outset (Time 1). Binomial logistic regression analysis revealed that perceived interparental conflict increased the risk of instability in friendship relationships across the 1-year period. Structural equation modeling analysis indicated that the association between perceived interparental conflict and friendship quality was mediated by emotion regulation and attachment security. The discussion focuses on mechanisms whereby interparental conflict influences early adolescents’ friendship relationships

Belonging to the LGBT+ community and intergenerational relations : the role of filial obligations

Adult children, who experience strong family norms (i.e., filial obligations) tend to have closer and more intimate intergenerational relations (i.e., support given to parents and relationship quality) with their parents. However, these findings are primarily based on heterosexual and cis-gender adults. According to research, the family norms of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and other sexual orientation and gender minority (LGBT+) adults tend to be lower compared to sexual orientation and gender identity majority (SGM) adults. Whether these lower filial obligations are associated with the intergenerational relations of LGBT+ adults is currently unknown. Hence, the present study aims to answer the following questions: 1) Do filial obligations mediate the relationship between belonging to the LGBT+ community and support given to parents? 2) Do filial obligations mediate the relationship between belonging to the LGBT+ community and the relationship quality to parents? The sample consisted of n = 135 LGBT+ adults and n = 135 SGM adults. The mean age was M = 28.4 years (SD = 8.54 years). The sample consisted of n = 156 (57.8%) women, n = 100 (37%) men, n = 14 (5.2%) people, who identified as gender non-binary. The measures included a scale on filial obligations, parent-child relationship quality and support given to parents. Structural Equation Modelling showed lower filial obligations in LGBT+ adults. Filial obligations mediated the association between belonging to the LGBT+ community and giving support to parents as well as the relationship quality to the mother, but not the father. In the discussion, the challenges adult LGBT+s face regarding their intergenerational relations will be addressed