Analysis of Antibody and Cytokine Markers for Leprosy Nerve Damage and Reactions in the INFIR Cohort in India

Leprosy is one of the oldest known diseases. In spite of the established fact that it is least infectious and a completely curable disease, the social stigma associated with it still lingers in many countries and remains a major obstacle to self reporting and early treatment. The nerve damage that occurs in leprosy is the most serious aspect of this disease as nerve damage leads to progressive impairment and disability. It is important to identify markers of nerve damage so that preventive measures can be taken. This prospective cohort study was designed to look at the potential association of some serological markers with reactions and nerve function impairment. Three hundred and three newly diagnosed patients from north India were recruited for this study. The study attempts to reflect a model of nerve damage initiated by mycobacterial antigens and maintained by ongoing inflammation through cytokines such as Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha and perhaps extended by antibodies against nerve components

Predicting neuropathy and reactions in leprosy at diagnosis and before incident events. Results from the INFIR cohort study

BackgroundLeprosy is a disease of skin and peripheral nerves. The process of nerve injury occurs gradually through the course of the disease as well as acutely in association with reactions. The INFIR (ILEP Nerve Function Impairment and Reactions) Cohort was established to identify clinically relevant neurological and immunological predictors for nerve injury and reactions.Methodology/Principal FindingsThe study, in two centres in India, recruited 188 new, previously untreated patients with multi-bacillary leprosy who had no recent nerve damage. These patients underwent a series of novel blood tests and nerve function testing including motor and sensory nerve conduction, warm and cold detection thresholds, vibrometry, dynamometry, monofilament sensory testing and voluntary muscle testing at diagnosis and at monthly follow up for the first year and every second month for the second year. During the 2 year follow up a total of 74 incident events were detected. Sub-clinical changes to nerve function at diagnosis and during follow-up predicted these new nerve events. Serological assays at baseline and immediately before an event were not predictive; however, change in TNF alpha before an event was a statistically significant predictor of that event.Conclusions/SignificanceThese findings increase our understanding of the processes of nerve damage in leprosy showing that nerve function impairment is more widespread than previously appreciated. Any nerve involvement, including sub-clinical changes, is predictive of further nerve function impairment. These new factors could be used to identify patients at high risk of developing impairment and disability

Bloom syndrome does not always present with sun-sensitive facial erythema

Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive condition characterized by severe pre- and postnatal growth deficiency, immunodeficiency, an increased risk for malignancies, craniofacial dysmorphisms, and "typical" erythematous sun-sensitive skin lesions of the face. This facial rash has a butterfly-shaped distribution around the nose and is usually observed for the first time during the early years of life. Though reported as being a main feature of Bloom syndrome, there seems to be phenotypic variability regarding this facial skin rash among patients. It has been previously reported that in some individuals with Bloom syndrome these sun-sensitive lesions are less prominent or even absent. In this report we describe a 36 year old woman with short stature, microcephaly, several dysmorphisms, congenital hypothyroidism and premature ovarian failure. She was diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma at 36 years of age, only a few months after her consultation at the department of Clinical Genetics. Whole Exome Sequencing demonstrated that she had Bloom syndrome caused by a compound heterozygous mutation in BLM (c.2207_2212delinsTAGATTC; p.(Tyr736Leufs*5) and c.3681del; p.(Lys1227Asnfs*52)). She did not have facial sun-sensitive erythematous rash during childhood nor adulthood. We conclude that Bloom syndrome does not always present with erythematous sun-sensitive skin lesions of the face. We would like to underline that phenotypic variation regarding this "hallmark" feature of Bloom syndrome exists. Being aware of this might prevent a delay in diagnosing this rare short-stature syndrome and, subsequently, its potential clinical implication

The association between antiplatelet therapy and changes in intraplaque hemorrhage in patients with mild to moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis:a longitudinal MRI study

Introduction: Carotid atherosclerotic intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) predicts stroke. Patients with a history of stroke are treated with antiplatelet agents to prevent secondary cardiovascular events. A positive association between previous antiplatelet use and IPH was reported in a cross-sectional analysis. We investigated the changes in IPH over 2 years in patients who recently started versus those with continued antiplatelet use. Methods: In the Plaque at Risk (PARISK) study, symptomatic patients with <70% ipsilateral carotid stenosis underwent carotid plaque magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the baseline and after 2 years to determine IPH presence and volume. Participants were categorized into new users (starting antiplatelet therapy following the index event) and continued users (previous use of antiplatelet therapy before the index event). The association between previous antiplatelet therapy and the presence of IPH at baseline MRI was investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The IPH volume change over a period of 2 years, defined as the difference in volume between follow-up and baseline, was investigated in each group with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The IPH volume change was categorized as progression, regression, or no change. Using multivariable logistic regression, we investigated the association between new antiplatelet use and (1) newly developed ipsilateral or contralateral IPH and (2) IPH volume progression. Results: A total of 108 patients underwent carotid MRI at the baseline and follow-up. At the baseline, previous antiplatelet therapy was associated with any IPH (OR = 5.6, 95% CI: 1.3–23.1; p = 0.02). Ipsilateral IPH volume did not change significantly during the 2 years in patients who continued receiving antiplatelet agents (86.4 mm3 [18.2–235.9] vs. 59.3 mm3 [11.4–260.3]; p = 0.6) nor in the new antiplatelet users (n = 31) (61.5 mm3 [0.0–166.9] vs. 27.7 mm3 [9.5–106.4]; p = 0.4). Similar results of a nonsignificant change in contralateral IPH volume during those 2 years were observed in both groups (p > 0.05). No significant associations were found between new antiplatelet use and newly developed IPH at 2 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.1–7.4) or the progression of IPH (ipsilateral: OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 0.3–19.1; contralateral: OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.01–8.5). Conclusion: Although the baseline association between IPH and previous antiplatelet therapy was confirmed in this larger cohort, the new onset of antiplatelet therapy after transient ischemic attack/stroke was not associated with the newly developed IPH or progression of IPH volume over the subsequent 2 years