Estudio del valor pronóstico de las células tumorales circulantes y de la utilidad de su caracterización molecular en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal y cáncer de cabeza y cuello en estadio avanzado

El adenocarcinoma colorrectal (CCR) y el cáncer de cabeza y cuello (CCC) son dos cánceres prevalentes y con tasas de supervivencia notablemente mejorables. Las células tumorales circulantes (CTC) constituyen una modalidad de biopsia líquida cuya utilidad como reservorio de información molecular ha sido insuficientemente estudiada. CellSearch®, un método de inmunoafinidad que emplea anticuerpos anti-EpCAM, es el sistema de detección de CTC más utilizado hasta la fecha y el único aprobado por la FDA para su uso asistencial, pero sólo permite la enumeración y no la recuperación de CTC para su caracterización molecular. IsoFlux™ es un sistema de enriquecimiento de CTC por inmunoafinidad que emplea también anticuerpos anti-EpCAM, y que además de la enumeración de CTC permite su recuperación para realizar análisis moleculares. IsoFlux™ solo ha sido evaluado previamente en una pequeña y heterogénea serie de pacientes con CCR y nunca se ha testado en pacientes con CCC. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue comparar la capacidad en la enumeración de CTC de CellSearch® e IsoFlux™ en pacientes con CCR metastásico (CCRm). Los objetivos secundarios fueron la evaluación de diferentes métodos de análisis mutacional en ADN de CTC recuperadas con IsoFlux™ en CCRm y la enumeración y recuperación de CTC por IsoFlux™ y su análisis mutacional en pacientes con CCC en fase recurrente/metastásica (R/M)..

Transcriptomic Correlates of Immunologic Activation in Head and Neck and Cervical Cancer

© 2021 Saiz-Ladera, Baliu-Piqué, Cimas, Manzano, García-Barberán, Camarero, Hinojal, Pandiella, Győrffy, Stewart, Cruz-Hernández, Pérez-Segura and Ocana.Targeting the immune system has emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of various tumor types, including Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) and Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), and checkpoint inhibitors have shown to improve patient survival in these tumor types. Unfortunately, not all cancers respond to these agents, making it necessary to identify responsive tumors. Several biomarkers of response have been described and clinically tested. As of yet what seems to be clear is that a pre-activation state of the immune system is necessary for these agents to be efficient. In this study, using established transcriptomic signatures, we identified a group of gene combination associated with favorable outcome in HNSCC linked to a higher presence of immune effector cells. CD2, CD3D, CD3E, and CXCR6 combined gene expression is associated with improved outcome of HNSCC patients and an increase of infiltrating immune effector cells. This new signature also identifies a subset of cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) patients with favorable prognosis, who show an increased presence of immune effector cells in the tumor, which outcome shows similarities with the HP-positive HNSCC cohort of patients. In addition, CD2, CD3D, CD3E, and CXCR6 signature is able to predict the best favorable prognosis in terms of overall survival of CSSC patients. Of note, these findings were not reproduced in other squamous cell carcinomas like esophageal SCC or lung SCC. Prospective confirmatory studies should be employed to validate these findings.This work has been supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI16/01121 and PI19/00808), ACEPAIN; Diputación de Albacete, CIBERONC and CRIS Cancer Foundation (to AO). Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (BFU2015-71371-R), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the Spanish Cancer Centers Network Program (RD12/0036/0003) and CIBERONC, the scientific foundation of the AECC and the CRIS Foundation (to AP). The work carried out in our laboratories receive support from the European Community through the regional development funding program (FEDER)

Paclitaxel Plus Cetuximab as Induction Chemotherapy for Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Unfit for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

ObjectivesInduction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by definitive treatment is an accepted non-surgical approach for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). However, ICT remains a challenge for cisplatin-unfit patients. We evaluated paclitaxel and cetuximab (P-C) as ICT in a cohort of LA-HNSCC patients unfit for cisplatin. Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC considered unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (age >70 and/or ECOG >= 2 and/or comorbidities) treated with weekly P-C followed by definitive radiotherapy and cetuximab (RT-C) between 2010 and 2017. Toxicity and objective response rate (ORR) to ICT and RT-C were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine baseline predictors of OS and PFS. ResultsA total of 57 patients were included. Grade 3-4 toxicity rate to ICT was 54.4%, and there was a death deemed treatment-related (G5). P-C achieved an ORR of 66.7%, including 12.3% of complete responses (CR). After P-C, 45 patients (78.9%) continued with concomitant RT-C. Twenty-six patients (45.6%) achieved a CR after definitive treatment. With a median follow-up of 21.7 months (range 1.2-94.6), median OS and PFS were 22.9 months and 10.7 months, respectively. The estimated 2-year OS and PFS rates were 48.9% and 33.7%, respectively. Disease stage had a negative impact on OS (stage IVb vs. III-IVa: HR = 2.55 [1.08-6.04], p = 0.03), with a trend towards worse PFS (HR = 1.92 [0.91-4.05], p = 0.09). Primary tumor in the larynx was associated with improved PFS but not OS (HR = 0.45 [0.22-0.92], p = 0.03, and HR = 0.69 [0.32-1.54], p = 0.37, respectively). ConclusionP-C was a well-tolerated and active ICT regimen in this cohort of LA-HNSCC patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. P-C might represent a valid ICT option for unfit patients and may aid patient selection for definitive treatment

Liquid Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspective on Squamous Cell, Salivary Gland, Paranasal Sinus and Nasopharyngeal Cancers

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is currently the sixth most common solid malignancy, accounting for a 50% five-year mortality rate. In the past decade, substantial improvements in understanding its molecular biology have allowed for a growing development of new biomarkers. Among these, the field of liquid biopsy has seen a sustained growth in HNC, demonstrating the feasibility to detect different liquid biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTC), extracellular vesicles and microRNAs. Liquid biopsy has been studied in HPV-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) but also in other subentities such as HPV-related SCCHN, EBV-positive nasopharyngeal cancer and oncogene-driven salivary gland cancers. However, future studies should be internally and externally validated, and ideally, clinical trials should incorporate the use of liquid biomarkers as endpoints in order to prospectively demonstrate their role in HNC. A thorough review of the current evidence on liquid biopsy in HNC as well as its prospects will be conducted

Detection of IDH1 Mutations in Plasma Using BEAMing Technology in Patients with Gliomas

Molecular testing using blood-based liquid biopsy approaches has not been widely investigated in patients with glioma. A prospective single-center study enrolled patients with gliomas ranging from grade II to IV. Peripheral blood (PB) was drawn at different timepoints for circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) monitoring. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used for the study of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations in the primary tumor. Beads, Emulsion, Amplification and Magnetics (BEAMing) was used for the study of IDH1 mutations in plasma and correlated with the NGS results in the tumor. Between February 2017 and July 2018, ten patients were enrolled, six with IDH1-mutant and four with IDH1 wild-type gliomas. Among the six IDH-mutant gliomas, three had the same IDH1 mutation detected in plasma (50%), and the IDH1-positive ctDNA result was obtained in patients either at diagnosis (no treatment) or during progressive disease. While the false-negative rate reached 86% (18/21), 15 out of the 18 (83%) plasma-negative results were from PB collected from the six IDH-mutant patients at times at which there was no accompanying evidence of tumor progression, as assessed by MRI. There were no false-positive cases in plasma collected from patients with IDH1 wild-type tumors. BEAMing detected IDH1 mutations in the plasma of patients with gliomas, with a modest clinical sensitivity (true positivity rate) but with 100% clinical specificity, with complete agreement between the mutant loci detected in tumor and plasma. Larger prospective studies should be conducted to expand on these findings, and further explore the clearance of mutations in PB from IDH1-positive patients in response to therapy

Association of Genomic Domains in BRCA1 and BRCA2 with Prostate Cancer Risk and Aggressiveness

Pathogenic sequence variants (PSV) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk and severity of prostate cancer. We evaluated whether PSVs in BRCA1/2 were associated with risk of overall prostate cancer or high grade (Gleason 8þ) prostate cancer using an international sample of 65 BRCA1 and 171 BRCA2 male PSV carriers with prostate cancer, and 3,388 BRCA1 and 2,880 BRCA2 male PSV carriers without prostate cancer. PSVs in the 3 0 region of BRCA2 (c.7914þ) were significantly associated with elevated risk of prostate cancer compared with reference bin c.1001c.7913 [HR ¼ 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25–2.52; P ¼ 0.001], as well as elevated risk of Gleason 8þ prostate cancer (HR ¼ 3.11; 95% CI, 1.63–5.95; P ¼ 0.001). c.756-c.1000 was also associated with elevated prostate cancer risk (HR ¼ 2.83; 95% CI, 1.71–4.68; P ¼ 0.00004) and elevated risk of Gleason 8þ prostate cancer (HR ¼ 4.95; 95% CI, 2.12–11.54; P ¼ 0.0002). No genotype–phenotype associations were detected for PSVs in BRCA1. These results demonstrate that specific BRCA2 PSVs may be associated with elevated risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer