467 research outputs found
Mammography messages in popular media: implications for patient expectations and shared clinical decision-making
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75005/1/j.1369-6513.2001.00120.x.pd
A survey of breast cancer physicians regarding patient involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions
Purpose: Shared breast cancer treatment decision-making between patients and physicians increases patient treatment satisfaction and compliance and is influenced by physician-related factors. Attitudes and behaviors about patient involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions and treatment-related communication were assessed by specialty among breast cancer physicians of women enrolled in the Breast Cancer Quality of Care Study (BQUAL). Results: Of 275 BQUAL physicians identified, 50.0% responded to the survey. Most physicians spend 46-60 min with the patient during the initial consult visit and 51.5% report that the treatment decision is made in one visit. Oncologists spend more time with new breast cancer patients during the initial consult (p = 0.021), and find it more difficult to handle their own feelings than breast surgeons (p = less than 0.001). Conclusion: Breast surgeons and oncologists share similar attitudes and behaviors related to patient involvement in treatment decision-making, yet oncologists report more difficulty managing their own feelings during the decision-making process
Cognitive effects of cancer and its treatments at the intersection of aging: what do we know; what do we need to know?
There is a fairly consistent, albeit non-universal body of research documenting cognitive declines after cancer and its treatments. While few of these studies have included subjects aged 65 years and older, it is logical to expect that older patients are at risk of cognitive decline. Here, we use breast cancer as an exemplar disease for inquiry into the intersection of aging and cognitive effects of cancer and its therapies. There are a striking number of common underlying potential biological risks and pathways for the development of cancer, cancer-related cognitive declines, and aging processes, including the development of a frail phenotype. Candidate shared pathways include changes in hormonal milieu, inflammation, oxidative stress, DNA damage and compromised DNA repair, genetic susceptibility, decreased brain blood flow or disruption of the blood-brain barrier, direct neurotoxicity, decreased telomere length, and cell senescence. There also are similar structure and functional changes seen in brain imaging studies of cancer patients and those seen with "normal" aging and Alzheimer's disease. Disentangling the role of these overlapping processes is difficult since they require aged animal models and large samples of older human subjects. From what we do know, frailty and its low cognitive reserve seem to be a clinically useful marker of risk for cognitive decline after cancer and its treatments. This and other results from this review suggest the value of geriatric assessments to identify older patients at the highest risk of cognitive decline. Further research is needed to understand the interactions between aging, genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors, and frailty phenotypes to best identify the subgroups of older patients at greatest risk for decline and to develop behavioral and pharmacological interventions targeting this group. We recommend that basic science and population trials be developed specifically for older hosts with intermediate endpoints of relevance to this group, including cognitive function and trajectories of frailty. Clinicians and their older patients can advance the field by active encouragement of and participation in research designed to improve the care and outcomes of the growing population of older cancer patients
Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up
The ongoing integration of cancer genomic testing into routine clinical care has led to increased demand for cancer genetic services. To meet this demand, there is an urgent need to enhance the accessibility and reach of such services, while ensuring comparable care delivery outcomes. This randomized trial compared 1-year outcomes for telephone genetic counseling with in-person counseling among women at risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer living in geographically diverse areas
Mammography screening: views from women and primary care physicians in Crete
Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women and a leading cause of death from cancer in women in Europe. Although breast cancer incidence is on the rise worldwide, breast cancer mortality over the past 25 years has been stable or decreasing in some countries and a fall in breast cancer mortality rates in most European countries in the 1990s was reported by several studies, in contrast, in Greece have not reported these favourable trends. In Greece, the age-standardised incidence and mortality rate for breast cancer per 100.000 in 2006 was 81,8 and 21,7 and although it is lower than most other countries in Europe, the fall in breast cancer mortality that observed has not been as great as in other European countries. There is no national strategy for screening in this country. This study reports on the use of mammography among middleaged women in rural Crete and investigates barriers to mammography screening encountered by women and their primary care physicians.
Methods: Design: Semi-structured individual interviews. Setting and participants: Thirty women between 45â65
years of age, with a mean age of 54,6 years, and standard deviation 6,8 from rural areas of Crete and 28 qualified
primary care physicians, with a mean age of 44,7 years and standard deviation 7,0 serving this rural population.
Main outcome measure: Qualitative thematic analysis.
Results: Most women identified several reasons for not using mammography. These included poor knowledge
of the benefits and indications for mammography screening, fear of pain during the procedure, fear of a serious
diagnosis, embarrassment, stress while anticipating the results, cost and lack of physician recommendation.
Physicians identified difficulties in scheduling an appointment as one reason women did not use mammography
and both women and physicians identified distance from the screening site, transportation problems and the
absence of symptoms as reasons for non-use.
Conclusion: Women are inhibited from participating in mammography screening in rural Crete. The provision
of more accessible screening services may improve this. However physician recommendation is important in
overcoming women's inhibitions. Primary care physicians serving rural areas need to be aware of barriers
preventing women from attending mammography screening and provide women with information and advice in a sensitive way so women can make informed decisions regarding breast caner screening
The population-based oncological health care study OVIS â recruitment of the patients and analysis of the non-participants
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ageing of the population is expected to bring an enormous growth in demand for oncological health care. In order to anticipate and respond to future trends, cancer care needs to be critically evaluated. The present study explores the possibility of conducting representative and population-based research on cancer care on the basis of data drawn from the Cancer Registry.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A population-based state-wide cohort study (OVIS) has been carried out in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. All patients with malignant melanoma, breast, or prostate cancer were identified in the Cancer Registry. Epidemiological data were obtained for all the patients and screened for study eligibility. A postal questionnaire requesting information on diagnosis, therapy, QoL and aftercare was sent to eligible patients.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 11,489 persons diagnosed with the cancer types of interest in the period from January 2002 to July 2004 were registered in the Cancer Registry. Of the 5,354 (47%) patients who gave consent for research, 4,285 (80% of consenters) completed the questionnaire. In terms of relevant epidemiological variables, participants with melanoma were not found to be different from non-participants with the same diagnosis. However, participants with breast or prostate cancer were slightly younger and had smaller tumours than patients who did not participate in our study.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Population-based cancer registry data proved to be an invaluable resource for both patient recruitment and non-participant analysis. It can help improve our understanding of the strength and nature of differences between participants and non-respondents. Despite minor differences observed in breast and prostate cancer, the OVIS-sample seems to represent the source population adequately.</p
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: Is overdiagnosis an issue for radiologists?
Overdiagnosis is diagnosis of cancers that would not present within the life of the patient and is one of the downsides of screening. This applies to low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ and some small grade 1 invasive cancers. Radiologists are responsible for cancer diagnosis, but at the time of diagnosis they cannot determine whether a particular low-grade diagnosis is one to which the definition of overdiagnosis applies. Overdiagnosis is likely to be driven by technological developments, including digital mammography, computer-aided detection and improved biopsy techniques. It is also driven by the patient's fear that cancer will be missed and the doctor's fear of litigation. It is therefore an issue of importance for radiologists, presenting them with difficult fine-tuned decisions in every assessment clinic that are ultimately counted later by those who evaluate their screening
Pre-treatment psychoneurological symptoms and their association with longitudinal cognitive function and quality of life in older breast cancer survivors
Context
Symptoms affect quality of life (QOL), functional status, and cognitive function in cancer survivors, but older survivors are understudied.
Objectives
To identify prototypical pre-systemic therapy psychoneurological symptom clusters among older breast cancer survivors, and determine whether these symptom clusters predicted cognition and QOL over time.
Methods
Women with newly diagnosed non-metastatic breast cancer (n=319) and matched non-cancer controls (n=347) aged 60+ completed questionnaires and neuropsychological tests before systemic therapy and 12- and 24-months later. Latent class analysis identified clusters of survivors based upon their pre-therapy depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain. Linear mixed-effects models examined changes in objective cognition, perceived cognition, and functional status (instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) disability, functional well-being, and breast cancer-specific QOL) by group, controlling for covariates.
Results
Nearly one-fifth of older survivors were classified as having a high pre-therapy symptoms (n=51; 16%); the remainder had a low symptoms (n=268; 84%); both groups improved over time on all outcomes. However, compared to the low symptom group and controls, survivors with high symptoms had lower baseline objective cognition and lower perceived cognition at baseline and 24-months, lower functional well-being at baseline and 12-months, greater IADL disability at baseline, and lower breast cancer-specific QOL at all time points (all p<0.05).
Conclusion
Nearly one-fifth of older breast cancer survivors had high psychoneurological symptoms at diagnosis, which, predict clinically meaningful decrements in perceived cognition and function in the first 24 months post-diagnosis. Pre-treatment psychoneurological symptom clusters could identify survivors for monitoring or intervention
Recommended from our members
Acceptability of Diagnostic Tests for Breast Cancer
Purpose . To assess the acceptability of new non-invasive breast cancer diagnostic tests intended to triage women in need of biopsy.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44214/1/10549_2004_Article_5121551.pd
Symptom burden among older breast cancer survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer (TLC) study
Background:
Little is known about longitudinal symptom burden and its consequences for well-being, and if lifestyle moderates burden in older survivors.
Methods:
We report on 36-month data from survivors 60+ with newly diagnosed non-metastatic breast cancer and non-cancer controls recruited August 2010-June 2016. Symptom burden was a sum of self-reported symptoms/diseases: pain (yes/no), fatigue (FACT-fatigue), cognitive (FACT-cog), sleep problems (yes/no), depression (CES-D), anxiety (STAI), and cardiac problems and neuropathy (yes/no). Well-being was measured using the FACT-G, scaled from 0â100. Lifestyle included smoking, alcohol use, BMI, physical activity, and leisure activities. Mixed models assessed relationships between treatment group (chemotherapy +/â hormonal, hormonal only, control) and symptom burden, lifestyle, and covariates. Separate models tested the effects of fluctuations in symptom burden and lifestyle on function.
Results:
All groups reported high baseline symptoms, and levels remained high over time; survivor-control differences were most notable for cognitive and sleep problems, anxiety, and neuropathy. The adjusted burden score was highest among chemotherapy-exposed survivors, followed by hormonal therapy vs. controls (p<.001). Burden score was related to physical, emotional, and functional well-being (e.g., survivors with lower vs. higher burden scores had 12.4-point higher physical well-being score). The composite lifestyle score was not related to symptom burden or well-being, but physical activity was significantly associated with each outcome (<.005).
Conclusions:
Cancer and its treatments are associated with a higher level of actionable symptoms and greater loss of well-being over time in older breast cancer survivors than comparable non-cancer populations, suggesting the need for surveillance and opportunities for intervention
- âŠ