Recommendations for a core outcome set for measuring standing balance in adult populations: a consensus-based approach

Standing balance is imperative for mobility and avoiding falls. Use of an excessive number of standing balance measures has limited the synthesis of balance intervention data and hampered consistent clinical practice.To develop recommendations for a core outcome set (COS) of standing balance measures for research and practice among adults.A combination of scoping reviews, literature appraisal, anonymous voting and face-to-face meetings with fourteen invited experts from a range of disciplines with international recognition in balance measurement and falls prevention. Consensus was sought over three rounds using pre-established criteria.The scoping review identified 56 existing standing balance measures validated in adult populations with evidence of use in the past five years, and these were considered for inclusion in the COS.Fifteen measures were excluded after the first round of scoring and a further 36 after round two. Five measures were considered in round three. Two measures reached consensus for recommendation, and the expert panel recommended that at a minimum, either the Berg Balance Scale or Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test be used when measuring standing balance in adult populations.Inclusion of two measures in the COS may increase the feasibility of potential uptake, but poses challenges for data synthesis. Adoption of the standing balance COS does not constitute a comprehensive balance assessment for any population, and users should include additional validated measures as appropriate.The absence of a gold standard for measuring standing balance has contributed to the proliferation of outcome measures. These recommendations represent an important first step towards greater standardization in the assessment and measurement of this critical skill and will inform clinical research and practice internationally

Properties of self-paced walking in chronic respiratory disease: A patient goal-oriented assessment

Background: Patients with chronic respiratory diseases often have the simple goal of wanting to walk for longer. We evaluated the properties of a patient goal-oriented, symptom-limited, self-paced walk (SPW). Methods: Patients with symptomatic chronic respiratory disease, referred for a 6-week course of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), were screened for eligibility. Baseline assessments included two SPWs with both time and speed measured, two 6-min walk tests (6MWTs), and the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale. On program completion, two SPWs and one 6MWT were performed. The repeatability, responsiveness, and validity of the SPW were assessed. Results: Two SPWs were completed by 50 and 37 patients before and after rehabilitation, respectively. The speed (r = -0.54, P < .001) but not the time (r = -0.23, P = .19) of the SPW correlated with Medical Research Council dyspnea grade. The mean SPW time increased on the second day of testing from 15.1 ± 8.4 min to 17.9 ± 7.7 min (P = .004), and the effect of test day was unaltered by PR (P = .80). The coefficient of repeatability for SPW time was 16.1 min. Both the mean SPW time (10.6 min; 95% CI, 6.6-14.5 min; P < .001) and the mean speed (3.5 m/min; 95% CI, 1.3-5.7 m/min; P < .01) increased after rehabilitation. Conclusions: The SPW time is an easily understandable, patient goal-oriented assessment with construct validity that is highly responsive to the effects of PR. The variability in SPW time makes it better suited to interpreting group rather than individual changes. Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00781183; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. © 2011 American College of Chest Physicians