29 research outputs found

    The torsion cosmology in Kaluza-Klein theory

    Full text link
    We have studied the torsion cosmology model in Kaluza-Klein theory. We considered two simple models in which the torsion vectors are Aμ=(α,0,0,0)A_{\mu}=(\alpha,0,0,0) and Aμ=a(t)2(0,β,β,β)A_{\mu}=a(t)^2(0,\beta,\beta,\beta), respectively. For the first model, the accelerating expansion of the Universe can be not explained without dark energy which is similar to that in the standard cosmology. But for the second model, we find that without dark energy the effect of torsion can give rise to the accelerating expansion of the universe and the alleviation of the well-known age problem of the three old objects for appropriated value of the model parameter β\beta. These outstanding features of the second torsion cosmology model have been supported by the Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) data.Comment: 12 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in JCA

    The Chinese version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised scale: Replication and extension to non-clinical and clinical individuals with OCD symptoms

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) was designed to evaluate the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in both clinical and non-clinical samples. The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of this scale.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The Chinese version of the OCI-R was administered to both a non-clinical sample (209 undergraduate students) and a clinical sample (56 obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the construct validity of the OCI-R in the non-clinical sample. The internal consistency at baseline and test-retest reliabilities at 4-week interval was examined in both the non-clinical and clinical samples.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The confirmatory factor analysis of the non-clinical sample confirmed a 6-factor model suggested by the original authors of the instrument (df = 120, RMSEA = 0.068, CFI = 0.88, NNFI = 0.85, GFI = 0.89). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were at an acceptable range for both the non-clinical and clinical samples. The OCI-R also showed good clinical discrimination for patients with OCD from healthy controls.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The Chinese version of the OCI-R is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring OCD symptoms in the Chinese context.</p
    corecore