14 research outputs found

    Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers' medical decision behaviour: systematic review

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement have gained popularity in the medical literature. Originally developed in mathematical psychology they can be used to evaluate physicians' behaviour in the setting of diagnostic testing or treatment decisions. We provide an overview of the use, objectives and methodology of these studies in the medical field. METHODS: Systematic review. We searched in electronic databases; reference lists of included studies. We included studies that examined medical decisions of physicians, nurses or medical students using cue weightings from answers to structured vignettes. Two reviewers scrutinized abstracts and examined full text copies of potentially eligible studies. The aim of the included studies, the type of clinical decision, the number of participants, some technical aspects, and the type of statistical analysis were extracted in duplicate and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: 30 reports published between 1983 and 2005 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 22 studies (73%) reported on treatment decisions and 27 (90%) explored the variation of decisions among experts. Nine studies (30%) described differences in decisions between groups of caregivers and ten studies (33%) described the decision behaviour of only one group. Only six studies (20%) compared decision behaviour against an empirical reference of a correct decision. The median number of considered attributes was 6.5 (IQR 4-9), the median number of vignettes was 27 (IQR 16-40). In 17 studies, decision makers had to rate the relative importance of a given vignette; in six studies they had to assign a probability to each vignette. Only ten studies (33%) applied a statistical procedure to account for correlated data. CONCLUSION: Various studies of medical choice and judgement have been performed to depict weightings of the value of clinical information from answers to structured vignettes of care givers. We found that the design and analysis methods used in current applications vary considerably and could be improved in a large number of cases

    Verwijsredenen van huisartsen en verloskundigen in Amsterdam bij (dreigende) miskraam gespiegeld aan de standaard '(Dreigende) miskraam' van het Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap

    No full text
    Objective. To determine the reasons general practitioners (GPs) and midwives have for referring patients with symptoms of imminent miscarriage to hospital and the management in hospital. Design. Prospective and descriptive. Setting. Research Centre Primary/Secondary Health Gare, University Hospital Free University, the 'Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis' hospital, both in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Method. During the period August 1994-February 1995 anamnesis, diagnostics, diagnosis and further management were recorded for all patients who visited the 'Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis' hospital with blood loss and/or pain in the first 16 weeks of gestation. Patients revealed their wishes concerning referral by filling in questionnaires. Their GPs/midwives were asked about the referral motives in a telephone interview. Results. In the hospital 105 patients were recorded; 34% came on their own initiative. In hospital none of the patients with the diagnosis 'imminent miscarriage' was referred back to the GP/midwife. Only 59% of the GPs/midwives performed the physical examinations the (imminent) miscarriage guideline of the Dutch Gollege of General Practitioners advises. In 56% of the 32 patients referred there was no reason for referral according to the (imminent) miscarriage guideline. Conclusion. The (imminent) miscarriage guideline issued by the Dutch College of General Practitioners was not always followed because patients went to the hospital on their own account, GPs/midwives did not agree with the guideline, patients wanted another policy and obstetricians kept patients in their own care

    Clozapine augmented with glutamate modulators in refractory schizophrenia: a review and metaanalysis

    No full text
    Clozapine is an efficacious antipsychotic drug for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but does not sufficiently improve these symptoms in a substantial proportion of this population. There is no convincing evidence for the efficacy of any clozapine augmentation strategy. New evidence suggests that glutamate receptors are a candidate target for therapeutic effects in schizophrenia. We present an overview of studies assessing the potential clinical utility of adding glutamatergic agents to clozapine. We conducted 3 metaanalyses of data on positive, negative and overall symptoms of schizophrenia, analysing results from 3 studies on clozapine augmentation with glycine, 6 studies on lamotrigine add-on therapy to clozapine and 4 studies on topiramate addition to clozapin

    Can noninvasive diagnostic tools predict tubal rupture or active bleeding in patients with tubal pregnancy?

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of noninvasive diagnostic tools to predict tubal rupture and active bleeding in patients with tubal pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two large teaching hospitals in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PATIENT(S): Consecutively seen patients with suspected tubal pregnancy who were scheduled to undergo confirmative laparoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Tubal rupture and/or active bleeding confirmed at laparoscopy. RESULT(S): Sixty-five (23%) of 288 patients had tubal rupture and/or active bleeding at laparoscopy. Abdominal pain, rebound tenderness on abdominal examination, fluid in the pouch of Douglas at transvaginal ultrasound examination, and a low serum hemoglobin level were independent predictors of tubal rupture and/or active bleeding. Pregnancy achieved with the use of IVF-ET and the presence of an ectopic gestational sac or an ectopic mass at ultrasound examination reduced the risk of tubal rupture. Abdominal pain was the most sensitive predictor, with a sensitivity of 95%. CONCLUSION(S): Because the nonsurgical management of tubal pregnancy should be used only when the risk of tubal rupture and/or active bleeding is low, it can be safely applied in only a limited number of patient

    Treatment of tubal pregnancy in the netherlands: an economic comparison of systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare from a societal perspective the costs of systemic methotrexate administration with those of laparoscopic salpingostomy for the treatment of patients with tubal pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: An economic evaluation was set up in tandem with a multicenter randomized clinical trial that compared systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy for the treatment of 100 hemodynamically stable patients with laparoscopically confirmed unruptured tubal pregnancy. Data on resources used for treatment and lost production time were prospectively collected and costs of both treatments were calculated by multiplying actual expenses for resource units at a single center and resource unit use measured in all centers. Costs were originally calculated in Dutch guilders and converted to US dollars at a rate of 1.67 guilders/1.RESULTS:Becauseclinicaloutcomesofthetrialwereequivalentforthe2strategiesacostminimizationanalysiswasdone.Meantotalcostsperpatientwere1. RESULTS: Because clinical outcomes of the trial were equivalent for the 2 strategies a cost-minimization analysis was done. Mean total costs per patient were 5721 for systemic methotrexate administration and 4066forlaparoscopicsalpingostomy,withameandifferenceof4066 for laparoscopic salpingostomy, with a mean difference of 1655 (95% confidence interval, 906906-2414). Costs of systemic methotrexate administration were similar to those of salpingostomy for patients in whom the initial serum human chorionic gonadotropin concentration was 3000 IU/L. CONCLUSIONS: Although systemic methotrexate administration is safe and effective for the treatment of tubal pregnancy, it does not necessarily reduce costs. Systemic methotrexate therapy could reduce costs if administered to patients with low initial serum human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations without confirmatory laparoscop

    Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic salpingostomy is a well-established treatment for patients with tubal pregnancy who desire to retain fertility. Another approach that preserves the fallopian tube is medical treatment. We compared systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic salpingostomy in the treatment of tubal pregnancy. Outcome measures were treatment success, tubal preservation, and homolateral tubal patency. METHODS: Between January, 1994, and September, 1996, haemodynamically stable patients with laparoscopically confirmed unruptured tubal pregnancy and no signs of active bleeding were randomly assigned systemic methotrexate (four 1.0 mg/kg doses of intramuscular methotrexate alternated with 0.1 mg/kg oral folinic acid) or laparoscopic salpingostomy. Treatment success was defined as complete elimination of the tubal pregnancy (serum human chorionic gonadotropin < 2 IU/L) and preservation of the tube. Homolateral tubal patency was assessed by hysterosalpingography. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 100 patients were included in the trial. Of 51 patients allocated systemic methotrexate, 42 (82%) were successfully treated with one course; two (4%) patients needed a second course for persistent trophoblast. Surgical intervention was needed in seven (14%) patients; salpingectomy was necessary in five of these patients for tubal rupture. Of the 49 patients allocated laparoscopic salpingostomy, 35 (72%) were successfully treated by laparoscopic salpingostomy alone; salpingectomy was needed in four (8%) patients, and ten (20%) needed methotrexate for persistent trophoblast. The tube was preserved in 46 (90%) patients in the methotrexate group versus 45 (92%) in the salpingostomy group (rate ratio 0.98 [95% CI 0.87-1.1]). Homolateral tubal patency could be assessed in 81 patients: the tube was patent in 23 (55%) of 42 patients in the methotrexate group and in 23 (59%) of 39 patients in the salpingostomy group (rate ratio 0.93 [0.64-1.4]). INTERPRETATION: In haemodynamically stable patients with unruptured tubal pregnancy, systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic salpingostomy were successful in treating the majority of cases. We found no significant difference between the treatments in the homolateral patency rate. Subsequent fertility outcome has to be awaited to show which treatment yields better fertility prospect

    Serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy when transvaginal sonography is inconclusive

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of initial and repeated serum hCG measurements in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in patients in whom transvaginal sonography is inconclusive and to evaluate whether patient characteristics influence the accuracy of serum hCG measurements. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Two large teaching hospitals in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PATIENT(S): Three hundred fifty-four consecutively seen pregnant patients with suspected EP and inconclusive transvaginal sonographic findings. INTERVENTION(S): Serum hCG measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The performance of repeated serum hCG measurements in the diagnosis of EP was evaluated through the analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULT(S): Initial serum hCG measurements were more diagnostic in conjunction with sonographic evidence of an ectopic mass or fluid in the pouch of Douglas than in the absence of sonographic abnormalities. On repeated measurement, the course of the serum hCG concentration provided more diagnostic information than did the absolute serum hCG concentration 2 and 4 days after the start of the diagnostic process. CONCLUSION(S): The interpretation of serum hCG measurements should depend on additional findings at transvaginal sonography. A cutoff level of 1,500 IU/L is recommended for patients with an ectopic mass or fluid in the pouch of Douglas; in patients without these findings, the cutoff level should be at least 2,000 IU/L. Four days after the start of the diagnostic process, any rise in the serum hCG concentration makes the diagnosis of EP very likel
    corecore