31 research outputs found

    Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusions in mice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fusions were induced in ten mice spine using a previously described technique of in situ endochondral ossification, harvested with soft tissue, and cast in radiolucent alginate material for handling. Using a validated software package and a customized mechanical apparatus that flexed and extended the spinal column, the amount of intervertebral motion between adjacent vertebral discs was determined with static flexed and extended lateral spine radiographs. Micro-CT images of the same were also blindly reviewed for fusion.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean intervertebral motion between control, non-fused, spinal vertebral discs was 6.1 ± 0.2° during spine flexion/extension. In fusion samples, adjacent vertebrae with less than 3.5° intervertebral motion had fusions documented by micro-CT inspection.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Measuring the amount of intervertebral rotation between vertebrae during spine flexion/extension is a relatively simple, cheap (<$100), clinically relevant, and fast test for assessing the mechanical success of spinal fusion in mice that compared favorably to the standard, micro-CT.</p

    Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions

    Full text link

    Biomécanique du rachis

    No full text

    Simulation strategy for impact against a reinforced concrete industrial building

    No full text

    Early outcomes after ALIF with cage and plate in discogenic low back pain

    Full text link

    Recombinant humanized mAb-E25, an anti-IgE mAb, in birch pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis

    No full text
    Background: Allergic rhinitis is a common condition often requiring treatment. Objective: We evaluated whether recombinant humanized (rhu)mAb-E25, a recombinant humanized construct of a murine antibody that binds to circulating IgE, could control symptoms and reduce intake of concomitant medication in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by birch pollen if given subcutaneously in a dose schedule predicted to reduce serum free IgE levels below 25 ng/mL. Methods: We randomly assigned 251 adult subjects with a history of SAR and a positive skin test response to birch pollen to receive 300 mg of rhumAb-E25 or placebo given 2 or 3 times during the season, depending on baseline IgE levels. The primary efficacy variable was the subject's average daily nasal symptom severity score (sneezing, itching, runny, and stuffy nose) from diary data collected over the double-blind treatment period. Secondary efficacy variables included the average number of rescue antihistamine tablets per day, the proportion of days with any SAR medication use, and rhinoconjunctivitis-specific quality of life (QOL). Results: Significant between-treatment differences in favor of rhumAb-E25 were observed in average daily nasal symptom severity scores, the average number of tablets of rescue antihistamines per day, the proportion of days with any SAR medication use, and all domains of QOL. Serum-free IgE levels were markedly lower in rhumAb-E25-treated subjects and were associated with clinical effectiveness. Recombinant humanized mAb-E25 was well tolerated. No anti-rhumAb-E25 antibodies were detected. Conclusion: Compared with placebo, rhumAb-E25 was safe and effective in controlling birch pollen-induced SAR symptoms, with less concomitant medication use and improved QOL. This study shows the therapeutic potential of anti-IgE antibody in SAR.</p
    corecore