3 research outputs found

    S.4.1 N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels predict incident pulmonary arterial hypertension in SSc

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a major cause of mortality in SSc. NT-proBNP may be a useful biomarker of prevalent PAH but its role in screening for incident PAH has not been evaluated. Methods. Patients recruited into the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study undergo annual echocardiography, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), 6-min walk test (6MWT) and have serum NT-proBNP measured (ElecsysproBNP II). The diagnosis of PAH is based on Dana point criteria at right heart catheterization (RHC). Patients with LV dysfunction or eGFR 36 mmHg, (ii) FVC/DLCO% >1.6 and no significant ILD, (iii) DLCO 189.2 pg/ml had a likelihood ratio of 26.4 for presence of PAH (c-statistic = 0.9; sensitivity 85%; specificity 97%). An NT-proBNP level 189.2 pg/ml and <82.9 pg/ml defining patients with a high and low likelihood of PAH, respectively. Further prospective studies are required in unselected patients in order to confirm these finding

    A prospective study of the 6 min walk test as a surrogate marker for haemodynamics in two independent cohorts of treatment-naive systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension

    No full text
    International audienceObjectives Despite the wide use of the 6 min walk distance (6MWD), no study has ever assessed its validity as a surrogate marker for haemodynamics and predictor of outcome in isolated pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-PAH). We designed this work to address this issue. Methods Treatment-naive patients with SSc-PAH were prospectively included from two sources: the French PAH Network (a prospective epidemiological cohort) (n=83) and randomised clinical trials submitted for drug approval (Food and Drug Administration) (n=332). Correlations between absolute values of the 6MWD and haemodynamics at baseline, as well as between variations of 6MWD and haemodynamics during follow-up, were studied in both populations. Results In the French cohort, baseline cardiac output (CO) (R-2=0.19, p=0.001) and New York Heart Association class (R-2=0.10, pConclusions In SSc-PAH, CO independently correlates with 6MWD at baseline, but accounts for a small amount of the variance of 6MWD in both study samples. This suggests that other non-haemodynamic factors could have an impact on the walk distance. Moreover, variations of 6MWD do not reflect changes in haemodynamics among treated patients. Our results suggest that 6MWD is not an accurate surrogate marker for haemodynamic severity, nor an appropriate outcome measure to assess changes in haemodynamics during follow-up in treated SSc-PAH
    corecore