The Latin American Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Registry: report 2019

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Latin America (LA) continues to represent a challenge due to the burden of disease it causes and the difficulty in accessing treatment. LA has a total population of 652 million people living in 20 countries that occupy an area of 19.2 million km2. The Latin American Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Registry (LADRTR), founded in 1991, has collected data and reports on patients receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT) since 1993. This article summarizes the registry data for 2019. Methods Participating countries complete an annual survey collecting aggregated data on incident and prevalent patients on KRT in all modalities. The different treatment modalities considered were hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and living functioning kidney graft (LFG). National gross domestic product per capita (GDP, expressed in US dollars) and life expectancy at birth (LEB) corresponding to the year 2019 were collected from the World Bank Data Bank. Prevalence and incidence were compared with previous years and were also correlated with GDP and LEB. Results On 31 December 2019 a total of 432 610 patients were in KRT in LA, corresponding to an overall unadjusted prevalence of 866 per million population (pmp). Regarding treatment modality, 66.7% of the prevalent patients were treated with HD and 9.3% with PD while 24% of the patients had an LFG. A total of 85 224 patients started KRT in LA, representing a total unadjusted incidence rate of 168 pmp. Diabetic nephropathy as a cause of CKD continues to be a relevant percentage (36%) and five countries reported CKD of nontraditional causes. The kidney transplant rate in the region was 22 pmp, varying from 1 to >60 pmp. The total prevalence of KRT correlated positively with GDP per capita (r2 = 0.6, P < 0.01) and LEB (r2 = 0.23, P < 0.05). The overall incidence rate also significantly correlated with GDP (r2 = 0.307, P < 0.05). The overall unadjusted mortality rate was 13%. Conclusion Accessibility to KRT is still limited in LA. It is necessary to continue the efforts made by each country and the Latin American Society of Nephrology and Hypertension to guarantee equal access to treatment

Step-by-step guide to setting up a kidney replacement therapy registry: the challenge of a national kidney replacement therapy registry

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become one of the most important public health problems worldwide. Analysis, and understanding, of this global/national/regional reality would benefit from renal registry databases. The implementation of a CKD registry (including all categories) is difficult to achieve, given its high cost. On the other hand, patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are easily accessible and constitute the most severe subgroup in terms of comorbidities and healthcare costs. A kidney replacement therapy registry (KRTR) is defined as the systematic and continuous collection of a population-based data set from ESKD patients treated by dialysis/kidney transplant. The lack of available data, particularly in emerging economies, leaves information gaps on healthcare and outcomes in these patients. The heterogeneity/absence of a KRTR in some countries is consistent with the inequities in access to KRT worldwide. In 2014, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) proposed to determine the prevalence of patients on dialysis for at least 700 patients per million inhabitants by 2019 in every Latin American (LA) country. Since then, PAHO and the Sociedad LatinoAmericana de Nefrología e Hipertensión have provided training courses and certification of KRTR in LA. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide guidance on how to set up a new KRTR in countries or regions that still lack one. Advice is provided on the sequential steps in the process of setting up a KRTR, personnel requirements, data set content and minimum quality indicators required

The epidemiology of renal replacement therapy in two different parts of the world: the Latin American Dialysis and Transplant Registry versus the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry

Objective. To compare the epidemiology of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Latin America and Europe, as well as to study differences in macroeconomic indicators, demographic and clinical patient characteristics, mortality rates, and causes of death between these two populations. Methods. We used data from 20 Latin American and 49 European national and subnational renal registries that had provided data to the Latin American Dialysis and Renal Transplant Registry (RLADTR) and the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry, respectively. The incidence and prevalence of RRT in 2013 were calculated per million population (pmp), overall and by subcategories of age, sex, primary renal disease, and treatment modality. The correlation between gross domestic product and the prevalence of RRT was analyzed using linear regression. Trends in the prevalence of RRT between 2004 and 2013 were assessed using Joinpoint regression analysis. Results. In 2013, the overall incidence at day 91 after the onset of RRT was 181 pmp for Latin American countries and 130 pmp for European countries. The overall prevalence was 660 pmp for Latin America and 782 pmp for Europe. In the Latin American countries, the annual increase in the prevalence averaged 4.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5%-5.6%) from 2004 to 2013, while the European countries showed an average annual increase of 2.2% (95% CI: 2.0%-2.4%) for the same time period. The crude mortality rate was higher in Latin America than in Europe (112 versus 100 deaths per 1 000 patient-years), and cardiovascular disease was the main cause of death in both of those regions. Conclusions. There are considerable differences between Latin America and Europe in the epidemiology of RRT for ESRD. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for these differences

La educación interprofesional en la universidad: retos y oportunidades

La educación interprofesional (EIP) es clave para garantizar el aprendizaje integrado de los alumnos de diferentes titulaciones, que ejercerán una labor profesional basada en el cuidado centrado en la persona, de manera conjunta. El proyecto de EIP de la Universidad de Navarra pretende dar a los alumnos de medicina, enfermería y farmacia los conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes necesarias para trabajar de manera interprofesional, centrándonos en trabajo en equipo, conocimiento y respeto de roles, resolución de conflictos y comunicación interprofesional. Para ello, el equipo de docentes implicados en este proyecto ha tenido que trabajar colaborativamente, experimentando las claves de este trabajo interprofesional, centrado en el alumno, constituyendo una experiencia enriquecedora, constructiva, y que ha aportado las claves del trabajo en equipo necesario para llevar a cabo un proyecto docente de EIP.Interprofessional Education is key to guarantee the integrated learning to different students, who will exercise together a professional work based on a person-centred care. The EIP project of the University of Navarra aims to provide to medical, nursing and pharmacy students with the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to work interprofessionally focu- sing on teamwork, knowledge and respect for roles, conflict resolution and interprofessional communication. To achieve this aim, the teachers from the different faculties involved in this project has worked collaboratively, experiencing the keys of this interprofessional work focused on the student, constituting an enriching, living a constructive experience and contributing to the cornerstone of the teamwork necessary to undertake an EIP teaching project

Educación interprofesional: una propuesta de la Universidad de Navarra

La asistencia sanitaria centrada en el paciente es la clave para una atención humana a la persona y a su familia. La práctica colaborativa en equipos interprofesionales resulta imprescindible para alcanzar una atención sanitaria de calidad. La universidad tiene la responsabilidad de preparar a sus graduados para trabajar en equipos interprofesionales. Una enseñanza/aprendizaje centrada en la persona, fundamentada en las competencias que definen la educación interprofesional, es clave para que nuestros estudiantes reconozcan la necesidad del trabajo colaborativo. Este artículo detalla un proyecto docente de educación interprofesional de la Universidad de Navarra, donde estudiantes de las facultades de medicina, enfermería y farmacia aprenden juntos y de manera gradual, las claves de cómo trabajar en equipo

Zoneamento ecológico de Spodoptera frugiperda, Anastrepha fraterculus e Grapholita molesta para o Rio Grande do Sul e sua relação com as mudanças climáticas globais.

bitstream/CPACT-2009-09/11960/1/documento_252.pd

Stent tunnel technique to save thrombosed native hemodialysis fistula with extensive venous aneurysm

Introduction and purpose: The increasing number of patients undergoing hemodialysis and the limited number of access sites have resulted in an increasing number of techniques to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. Thrombosed arteriovenous (AV) fistulas with large venous aneurysms have poor treatment results, with both endovascular and surgical techniques, leading to a high rate of definitive AV access loss. The purpose of this study was to review the feasibility and initial results of this novel endovascular treatment of thrombosed AV fistulas with large venous aneurysms. Materials and methods: A novel endovascular treatment technique of inserting nitinol auto-expandable uncovered stents stretching through the whole puncture site area, thus creating a tunnel inside the thrombus, was retrospectively analyzed and described. Results: A total of 17 stents were placed in 10 hemodialysis fistulas, with a mean venous coverage length of 17.8 cm. In all the cases, 100% technical success was achieved, with complete restoration of blood flow in all patients. There were no procedure-related complications. The mean follow-up was 167 days (range 60–420 days), with a primary and assisted patency of 80% and 100%, respectively. No multiple trans-stent struts-related complications were observed. Three stent fractures were diagnosed with plain films at the site of puncture without consequence in the venous access permeability. Conclusion: The “stent tunnel technique” is a feasible, safe and effective alternative to salvage native hemodialysis access, thus extending the function of the venous access with no signs of stent-related complications and a respectable midterm patency