45 research outputs found

    Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training versus Continuous Training on Physical Fitness, Cardiovascular Function and Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients

    Get PDF
    Introduction Physical fitness is an important prognostic factor in heart failure (HF). To improve fitness, different types of exercise have been explored, with recent focus on high-intensity interval training (HIT). We comprehensively compared effects of HIT versus continuous training (CT) in HF patients NYHA II-III on physical fitness, cardiovascular function and structure, and quality of life, and hypothesize that HIT leads to superior improvements compared to CT. Methods Twenty HF patients (male:female 19:1, 64±8 yrs, ejection fraction 38±6%) were allocated to 12-weeks of HIT (10*1-minute at 90% maximal workload—alternated by 2.5 minutes at 30% maximal workload) or CT (30 minutes at 60–75% of maximal workload). Before and after intervention, we examined physical fitness (incremental cycling test), cardiac function and structure (echocardiography), vascular function and structure (ultrasound) and quality of life (SF-36, Minnesota living with HF questionnaire (MLHFQ)). Results Training improved maximal workload, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) related to the predicted VO2peak, oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold, and maximal oxygen pulse (all P<0.05), whilst no differences were present between HIT and CT (N.S.). We found no major changes in resting cardiovascular function and structure. SF-36 physical function score improved after training (P<0.05), whilst SF-36 total score and MLHFQ did not change after training (N.S.). Conclusion Training induced significant improvements in parameters of physical fitness, although no evidence for superiority of HIT over CT was demonstrated. No major effect of training was found on cardiovascular structure and function or quality of life in HF patients NYHA II-III

    Documenting the Recovery of Vascular Services in European Centres Following the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Peak: Results from a Multicentre Collaborative Study

    Get PDF
    Objective: To document the recovery of vascular services in Europe following the first COVID-19 pandemic peak. Methods: An online structured vascular service survey with repeated data entry between 23 March and 9 August 2020 was carried out. Unit level data were collected using repeated questionnaires addressing modifications to vascular services during the first peak (March – May 2020, “period 1”), and then again between May and June (“period 2”) and June and July 2020 (“period 3”). The duration of each period was similar. From 2 June, as reductions in cases began to be reported, centres were first asked if they were in a region still affected by rising cases, or if they had passed the peak of the first wave. These centres were asked additional questions about adaptations made to their standard pathways to permit elective surgery to resume. Results: The impact of the pandemic continued to be felt well after countries’ first peak was thought to have passed in 2020. Aneurysm screening had not returned to normal in 21.7% of centres. Carotid surgery was still offered on a case by case basis in 33.8% of centres, and only 52.9% of centres had returned to their normal aneurysm threshold for surgery. Half of centres (49.4%) believed their management of lower limb ischaemia continued to be negatively affected by the pandemic. Reduced operating theatre capacity continued in 45.5% of centres. Twenty per cent of responding centres documented a backlog of at least 20 aortic repairs. At least one negative swab and 14 days of isolation were the most common strategies used for permitting safe elective surgery to recommence. Conclusion: Centres reported a broad return of services approaching pre-pandemic “normal” by July 2020. Many introduced protocols to manage peri-operative COVID-19 risk. Backlogs in cases were reported for all major vascular surgeries

    Long-term risk prediction after major lower limb amputation: 1-year results of the PERCEIVE study

    Get PDF
    Background: Decision-making when considering major lower limb amputation is complex and requires individualized outcome estimation. It is unknown how accurate healthcare professionals or relevant outcome prediction tools are at predicting outcomes at 1-year after major lower limb amputation. Methods: An international, multicentre prospective observational study evaluating healthcare professional accuracy in predicting outcomes 1 year after major lower limb amputation and evaluation of relevant outcome prediction tools identified in a systematic search of the literature was undertaken. Observed outcomes at 1 year were compared with: healthcare professionals' preoperative predictions of death (surgeons and anaesthetists), major lower limb amputation revision (surgeons) and ambulation (surgeons, specialist physiotherapists and vascular nurse practitioners); and probabilities calculated from relevant outcome prediction tools. Results: A total of 537 patients and 2244 healthcare professional predictions of outcomes were included. Surgeons and anaesthetists had acceptable discrimination (C-statistic = 0.715), calibration and overall performance (Brier score = 0.200) when predicting 1-year death, but performed worse when predicting major lower limb amputation revision and ambulation (C-statistics = 0.627 and 0.662 respectively). Healthcare professionals overestimated the death and major lower limb amputation revision risks. Consultants outperformed trainees, especially when predicting ambulation. Allied healthcare professionals marginally outperformed surgeons in predicting ambulation. Two outcome prediction tools (C-statistics = 0.755 and 0.717, Brier scores = 0.158 and 0.178) outperformed healthcare professionals' discrimination, calibration and overall performance in predicting death. Two outcome prediction tools for ambulation (C-statistics = 0.688 and 0.667) marginally outperformed healthcare professionals. Conclusion: There is uncertainty in predicting 1-year outcomes following major lower limb amputation. Different professional groups performed comparably in this study. Two outcome prediction tools for death and two for ambulation outperformed healthcare professionals and may support shared decision-making

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    A survey to assess job satisfaction among junior doctors in Greece

    No full text
    Introduction: Junior doctors have to learn how to deal with long shifts, lack of sleep, study hours, increased responsibilities, hard competition, and also a personal and social life. This amount of pressure leads to both physical and mental illness. The present study seeks to unveil how Greek junior doctors perceive their residency, focusing on job satisfaction. Methods: A 36-question survey based on the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) translated into the Greek language, was placed online and promoted to junior doctors. Pay, Promotion, Supervision, Fringe Benefits, Contingent Rewards, Operating Procedures, Coworkers, Nature of Work, and Communication facets were studied. Results: 113 junior doctors replied, 52 (46%) males and 61 (54%) females with a mean age of 33,4 years. They appear dissatisfied within their working environment (JSS score=100,4). This applies more to females (97,1) than males (104,3). They only feel satisfied with the nature of their work (16,5) with females more satisfied (16,7) than males (16,3). Pay facet presented the worst results, independent of sex. Greek junior doctors consider themselves working in far worse environment than that of their American colleagues (JSS score=135,8 compared to 100,4 in Greece). Conclusion: The serious problems Greek junior doctors face are depicted with truly disappointing figures, with bureaucracy being the major problem leading to less work efficiency. More healthcare investments and fairer salaries must be implemented, especially in times of economic crisis, as good health is paramount for a stable society and public health is the result of the work of the country’s hard-working junior doctors

    Plerixafor mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors to support further high-dose chemotherapy cycles in a patient with germ-cell tumor relapsing after previous tandem high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation

    No full text
    Salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation represents a curative treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumors (GCTs). However, an appreciable proportion of these fail to mobilize adequate numbers of hematopoietic progenitors; thus, plerixafor is applied for that purpose. Limited data exist on remobilization of HSCs after previous autografting. Here, we report a unique case that had undergone successful previous tandem HDC for relapsed GCT, and 1 year later required remobilization of HSCs to support two further cycles of HDC after subsequent multiple relapses and refractoriness requiring various salvage regimens. Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor showed its efficacy in mobilizing 6×106 CD34+/kg HSCs able to rescue two HDC cycles of carboplatin-etoposide, leading to stable hematopoietic engraftment. Plerixafor showed its potency to mobilize adequate numbers of HSCs in a patient with relapsed/refractory GCT after previous tandem HDC and autografting. The case is discussed in the context of HSC mobilization in patients who have undergone previous HDC and autografting and are deemed to have poor hematopoietic reserves, and a detailed literature review of this topic is provided

    Multiple non-syndromic basal cell carcinoma with the chest as primary site and lung metastases: A rare case

    No full text
    Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in humans, usually affecting elderly Caucasian men and skin regions mostly exposed to the sun, that rarely metastasizes. We report an unusual and aggressive case of multiple, non-syndromic metastatic BCC with an uncommon primary site in the chest and pulmonary metastases, treated successfully with surgery and vismodegib. A 51-year-old woman presented with a large pigmentary lesion of the chest, close to the sternum. She had the lesion for &gt; 25 years and lately noticed multiple facial lesions. The diagnosis of multiple BCC was suspected and a punch biopsy of the primary lesion was performed. Diagnosis was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (BerEp4+, EMA- phenotype). After excision, staging with a thorax computed tomography scan revealed metastatic micro-nodules in the left lung, confirmed histologically after video-assisted thoracic surgical biopsy. Adjuvant chemotherapy with vismodegib was proposed and administered. At 30 days follow-up, thorax computed tomography scan was unaltered and her facial lesions showed significant regression. Although prognosis remains poor, early diagnosis and prompt management complimented by novel biological agents, like vismodegib, targeting disease pathogenesis, seems to bring promising results. © 2021 Page Press Publications. All rights reserved

    Clarithromycin modulates immune responses in experimental peritonitis

    No full text
    Based on clinical data revealing a promising immunomodulatory effect of clarithromycin in sepsis due to ventilator-associated pneumonia, the efficacy of clarithromycin in experimental peritonitis and sepsis was assessed with particular emphasis on immune function. Cecal puncture and ligation was performed in rabbits assigned to the following groups: Group A, controls (n = 12); Group B, intravenous clarithromycin treatment (n = 15); Group C, piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) treatment (n = 10); Group D, clarithromycin + TZP combination treatment (n = 12). Blood was sampled at serial time intervals and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated. Apoptosis of lymphocytes and monocytes was measured by flow cytometric analysis. PBMCs were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and Pam3Cys for the release of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα). Tissue bacterial growth was quantitatively measured after death or sacrifice. Survival in Group D after 10 days was prolonged compared with the other groups. Early apoptosis of lymphocytes in Group B was lower compared with Group D at 2 h and compared with Group C at 4 h. Early apoptosis of monocytes in Group B was lower compared with Group C at 24 h. Following stimulation of PBMCs with LPS, release of TNFα was decreased in Group B compared with Groups A and D at 2 h. Bacterial growth in tissues of Groups C and D was decreased compared with Group A. It is concluded that clarithromycin modulates the function of the immune response in experimental peritonitis by decreasing the rate of early apoptosis of lymphocytes and monocytes and by decreasing the ex vivo release of TNFα by blood monocytes. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved
    corecore