Pharmacogenomics for Prediction of Cardiovascular Toxicity: Landscape of Emerging Data in Breast Cancer Therapies

Breast cancer; Cardiotoxicity; PharmacogenomicsCáncer de mama; Cardiotoxicidad; FarmacogenómicaCàncer de mama; Cardiotoxicitat; FarmacogenòmicaPharmacogenomics is an emerging field in oncology, one that could provide valuable input on identifying patients with inherent risk of toxicity, thus allowing for treatment tailoring and personalization on the basis of the clinical and genetic characteristics of a patient. Cardiotoxicity is a well-known side effect of anthracyclines and anti-HER2 agents, although at a much lower incidence for the latter. Data on single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to cardiotoxicity are emerging but are still scarce, mostly being of retrospective character and heterogeneous. A literature review was performed, aiming to describe current knowledge in pharmacogenomics and prediction of cardiotoxicity related to breast cancer systemic therapies and radiotherapies. Most available data regard genes encoding various enzymes related to anthracycline metabolism and HER2 polymorphisms. The available data are presented, together with the challenges and open questions in the field.This study was supported by a grant from Percy Falks Stiftelse to A.P

Distance-based delivery of exercise for people treated for breast, prostate or colorectal cancer : a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of EX-MED Cancer Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Regular exercise has been shown to have beneficial health effects in cancer survivors, including improving quality of life and other important health outcomes. However, providing people with cancer with easily accessible, high-quality exercise support and programs is a challenge. Therefore, there is a need to develop easily accessible exercise programs that draw upon the current evidence. Supervised, distance-based exercise programs have the benefit of reaching out to many people whilst providing the support of an exercise professional. The aim of the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial is to examine the effectiveness of a supervised, distance-based exercise program, in people previously treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as well as other physiological and patient-reported health outcomes. METHODS: The EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial is a prospective randomised controlled trial including 200 people that have completed curative treatment for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer. Participants are randomly allocated to an exercise group or a routine care control group. The exercise group will participate in a supervised, distanced-based exercise program delivered by a personal trainer who has undertaken specialised exercise oncology education modules. The intervention consists of a combination of resistance and aerobic exercises with participants completing two 60-min sessions per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30) assessed at baseline, 3- (end of intervention and primary endpoint) and 6-months post-baseline. Secondary outcomes are physiological (cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, physical function, body composition) and patient-reported outcomes (cancer-related symptoms, fatigue, self-reported physical activity), and self-efficacy of exercise. Furthermore, the trial will explore and describe the experiences of participation in the exercise intervention. DISCUSSION: The EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of a supervised, distance-based exercise program for survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. If successful, it will contribute to the implementation of flexible and effective exercise programs as part of the standard of care for people following cancer treatment, which is likely to contribute to a reduction in the burden of cancer on the individual, health care system and society. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT05064670. Registered on October 1, 2021

Evidence-based prediction and prevention of cardiovascular morbidity in adults treated for cancer

Background Cancer treatment-related morbidity relevantly compromises health status in cancer survivors, and efforts to optimise health-related outcomes in this population are vital to maximising healthy survivorship. A pre-treatment assessment - and possibly preventive management strategies - of cancer patients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) seems a rational approach in this regard. Definitive evidence for such strategies is largely lacking, thereby impeding the formulation of firm recommendations. Results The current scoping review aims to summarise and grade the evidence regarding strategies for prediction and prevention of CVD in adults in relation to oncological treatments. We conducted a scoping literature search for different strategies for primary prevention, such as medical and lifestyle interventions, as well as the use of predictive risk scores. We identified studies with moderate to good strength and up to now limited evidence to recommend primary preventive strategies in unselected patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic oncologic therapies. Conclusion Efforts to minimize the CVD burden in cancer survivors are needed to accomplish healthy survivorship. This can be done by means of robust models predictive for CVD events or application of interventions during or after oncological treatments. Up to now there is insufficient evidence to implement preventive strategies in an unselected group of patients treated with potential cardiotoxic oncological treatments. We conclude that randomised controlled trials are needed that evaluate medical and lifestyle interventions in groups at increased risk for complications, in order to be able to influence chronic illness risks, such as cardiovascular complications, for cancer survivors.Funding Agencies|Karolinska InstituteKarolinska Institutet</p

Tackling hurdles in front of young clinical investigators in oncology – Results from an international survey

Introduction Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and coordinated research efforts are vital to improve global outcomes. Clinical or translational research is usually planned, coordinated and executed by clinical researchers. With this survey we aimed to identify the main hurdles in front of young clinical investigators in oncology. Methods and materials An anonymized survey was distributed using social media between April and November 2022. Target population were health-care professionals in the field of oncology – physicians, nurses and researchers. We divided participants according to working experience (40 years of age) and country of practice (Europeans vs. non-Europeans). Results We received 121 responses from participants practicing in 36 countries. Eighty-seven (72%) of the participants were under 40 years. Eighty-nine (74%) were from European countries and thirty-two (26%) were from non-European. Experienced and European professionals were more likely to be involved in all different aspects of clinical trials. The main source of funding – independently of geographic location – were industry grants. Investigators out of Europe have less participation in international grants. Over 50% of participants dedicate time for clinical research from their personal time and are not paid for it. Almost 50% of investigators don’t have access to an experienced mentor in their institution. Conclusion The majority of respondents to our survey are active clinical researchers. Our data indicate that access to education and training as well as possibilities for appropriate networking, and specifically lack of mentorship, are key limiting factors in developing clinical research by healthcare professionals