Merging single-track location Elastographic imaging with the frequency shift method improves shear wave attenuation measurements

The frequency shift (FS) method is emerging as the standard approach for estimating shear wave attenuation coefficient (SWA). However, measurement noise can negatively impact the FS method’s accuracy, especially when employed in vivo. We hypothesized that combining plane wave single-track location shear wave elastography imaging with the FS method would reduce this problem. To test our hypothesis, we performed studies on calibrated phantoms and two groups of in vivo murine liver: control and obese mice. We evaluated the performance of various SWA methods, including the plane wave single-track location frequency shift (pSTL-FS) method that we recently developed, the original FS method, and the attenuation-measuring-shear-wave ultrasound elastography (AMUSE) method. We also assessed the effectiveness of assuming a Gaussian distribution versus a Gamma distribution for the shear wave spectrum when estimating SWA coefficients with the pSTL-FS and FS methods. The actual SWA coefficients of the phantoms were determined by performing independent mechanical testing on representative samples. The accuracy incurred when estimating SWA ranged from 84.69% to 97.55% for pSTL-FS (Gamma), 51.37%–72.18% for pSTL-FS (Gaussian), 40.33%–57.00% for FS (Gamma), 39.33%–55.37% for FS (Gaussian), and 59.25%–99.22% for AMUSE. The results of studies performed on murine livers (n = 10) revealed that assuming a Gaussian distribution during pSTL-FS imaging resulted in lower attenuation values than when a Gamma distribution was assumed. We also observed that pSTL-FS (Gamma) resulted in the highest significant difference between control and obese mice than all other approaches (p-value <0.0001). We also observed that the standard FS method with either Gamma or Gaussians produced lower attenuation estimates than pSTL-FS, AMUSE and mechanical testing. The mean attenuation coefficients of the murine livers measured with the pSTL-FS (Gamma and Gaussian functions) methods were consistently higher than those computed with the standard FS methods but lower than those computed with the AMUSE method. Our results demonstrated that combining the pSTL method with FS method provided more robust estimates of the SWA coefficient. For the murine livers, a Gamma distribution is more representative of the shear wave frequency spectrum than a Gaussian distribution

Image3_Merging single-track location Elastographic imaging with the frequency shift method improves shear wave attenuation measurements.tiff

The frequency shift (FS) method is emerging as the standard approach for estimating shear wave attenuation coefficient (SWA). However, measurement noise can negatively impact the FS method’s accuracy, especially when employed in vivo. We hypothesized that combining plane wave single-track location shear wave elastography imaging with the FS method would reduce this problem. To test our hypothesis, we performed studies on calibrated phantoms and two groups of in vivo murine liver: control and obese mice. We evaluated the performance of various SWA methods, including the plane wave single-track location frequency shift (pSTL-FS) method that we recently developed, the original FS method, and the attenuation-measuring-shear-wave ultrasound elastography (AMUSE) method. We also assessed the effectiveness of assuming a Gaussian distribution versus a Gamma distribution for the shear wave spectrum when estimating SWA coefficients with the pSTL-FS and FS methods. The actual SWA coefficients of the phantoms were determined by performing independent mechanical testing on representative samples. The accuracy incurred when estimating SWA ranged from 84.69% to 97.55% for pSTL-FS (Gamma), 51.37%–72.18% for pSTL-FS (Gaussian), 40.33%–57.00% for FS (Gamma), 39.33%–55.37% for FS (Gaussian), and 59.25%–99.22% for AMUSE. The results of studies performed on murine livers (n = 10) revealed that assuming a Gaussian distribution during pSTL-FS imaging resulted in lower attenuation values than when a Gamma distribution was assumed. We also observed that pSTL-FS (Gamma) resulted in the highest significant difference between control and obese mice than all other approaches (p-value <0.0001). We also observed that the standard FS method with either Gamma or Gaussians produced lower attenuation estimates than pSTL-FS, AMUSE and mechanical testing. The mean attenuation coefficients of the murine livers measured with the pSTL-FS (Gamma and Gaussian functions) methods were consistently higher than those computed with the standard FS methods but lower than those computed with the AMUSE method. Our results demonstrated that combining the pSTL method with FS method provided more robust estimates of the SWA coefficient. For the murine livers, a Gamma distribution is more representative of the shear wave frequency spectrum than a Gaussian distribution.</p

Image1_Merging single-track location Elastographic imaging with the frequency shift method improves shear wave attenuation measurements.tiff

The frequency shift (FS) method is emerging as the standard approach for estimating shear wave attenuation coefficient (SWA). However, measurement noise can negatively impact the FS method’s accuracy, especially when employed in vivo. We hypothesized that combining plane wave single-track location shear wave elastography imaging with the FS method would reduce this problem. To test our hypothesis, we performed studies on calibrated phantoms and two groups of in vivo murine liver: control and obese mice. We evaluated the performance of various SWA methods, including the plane wave single-track location frequency shift (pSTL-FS) method that we recently developed, the original FS method, and the attenuation-measuring-shear-wave ultrasound elastography (AMUSE) method. We also assessed the effectiveness of assuming a Gaussian distribution versus a Gamma distribution for the shear wave spectrum when estimating SWA coefficients with the pSTL-FS and FS methods. The actual SWA coefficients of the phantoms were determined by performing independent mechanical testing on representative samples. The accuracy incurred when estimating SWA ranged from 84.69% to 97.55% for pSTL-FS (Gamma), 51.37%–72.18% for pSTL-FS (Gaussian), 40.33%–57.00% for FS (Gamma), 39.33%–55.37% for FS (Gaussian), and 59.25%–99.22% for AMUSE. The results of studies performed on murine livers (n = 10) revealed that assuming a Gaussian distribution during pSTL-FS imaging resulted in lower attenuation values than when a Gamma distribution was assumed. We also observed that pSTL-FS (Gamma) resulted in the highest significant difference between control and obese mice than all other approaches (p-value <0.0001). We also observed that the standard FS method with either Gamma or Gaussians produced lower attenuation estimates than pSTL-FS, AMUSE and mechanical testing. The mean attenuation coefficients of the murine livers measured with the pSTL-FS (Gamma and Gaussian functions) methods were consistently higher than those computed with the standard FS methods but lower than those computed with the AMUSE method. Our results demonstrated that combining the pSTL method with FS method provided more robust estimates of the SWA coefficient. For the murine livers, a Gamma distribution is more representative of the shear wave frequency spectrum than a Gaussian distribution.</p

Image4_Merging single-track location Elastographic imaging with the frequency shift method improves shear wave attenuation measurements.tiff

The frequency shift (FS) method is emerging as the standard approach for estimating shear wave attenuation coefficient (SWA). However, measurement noise can negatively impact the FS method’s accuracy, especially when employed in vivo. We hypothesized that combining plane wave single-track location shear wave elastography imaging with the FS method would reduce this problem. To test our hypothesis, we performed studies on calibrated phantoms and two groups of in vivo murine liver: control and obese mice. We evaluated the performance of various SWA methods, including the plane wave single-track location frequency shift (pSTL-FS) method that we recently developed, the original FS method, and the attenuation-measuring-shear-wave ultrasound elastography (AMUSE) method. We also assessed the effectiveness of assuming a Gaussian distribution versus a Gamma distribution for the shear wave spectrum when estimating SWA coefficients with the pSTL-FS and FS methods. The actual SWA coefficients of the phantoms were determined by performing independent mechanical testing on representative samples. The accuracy incurred when estimating SWA ranged from 84.69% to 97.55% for pSTL-FS (Gamma), 51.37%–72.18% for pSTL-FS (Gaussian), 40.33%–57.00% for FS (Gamma), 39.33%–55.37% for FS (Gaussian), and 59.25%–99.22% for AMUSE. The results of studies performed on murine livers (n = 10) revealed that assuming a Gaussian distribution during pSTL-FS imaging resulted in lower attenuation values than when a Gamma distribution was assumed. We also observed that pSTL-FS (Gamma) resulted in the highest significant difference between control and obese mice than all other approaches (p-value <0.0001). We also observed that the standard FS method with either Gamma or Gaussians produced lower attenuation estimates than pSTL-FS, AMUSE and mechanical testing. The mean attenuation coefficients of the murine livers measured with the pSTL-FS (Gamma and Gaussian functions) methods were consistently higher than those computed with the standard FS methods but lower than those computed with the AMUSE method. Our results demonstrated that combining the pSTL method with FS method provided more robust estimates of the SWA coefficient. For the murine livers, a Gamma distribution is more representative of the shear wave frequency spectrum than a Gaussian distribution.</p

DataSheet1_Merging single-track location Elastographic imaging with the frequency shift method improves shear wave attenuation measurements.docx

The frequency shift (FS) method is emerging as the standard approach for estimating shear wave attenuation coefficient (SWA). However, measurement noise can negatively impact the FS method’s accuracy, especially when employed in vivo. We hypothesized that combining plane wave single-track location shear wave elastography imaging with the FS method would reduce this problem. To test our hypothesis, we performed studies on calibrated phantoms and two groups of in vivo murine liver: control and obese mice. We evaluated the performance of various SWA methods, including the plane wave single-track location frequency shift (pSTL-FS) method that we recently developed, the original FS method, and the attenuation-measuring-shear-wave ultrasound elastography (AMUSE) method. We also assessed the effectiveness of assuming a Gaussian distribution versus a Gamma distribution for the shear wave spectrum when estimating SWA coefficients with the pSTL-FS and FS methods. The actual SWA coefficients of the phantoms were determined by performing independent mechanical testing on representative samples. The accuracy incurred when estimating SWA ranged from 84.69% to 97.55% for pSTL-FS (Gamma), 51.37%–72.18% for pSTL-FS (Gaussian), 40.33%–57.00% for FS (Gamma), 39.33%–55.37% for FS (Gaussian), and 59.25%–99.22% for AMUSE. The results of studies performed on murine livers (n = 10) revealed that assuming a Gaussian distribution during pSTL-FS imaging resulted in lower attenuation values than when a Gamma distribution was assumed. We also observed that pSTL-FS (Gamma) resulted in the highest significant difference between control and obese mice than all other approaches (p-value <0.0001). We also observed that the standard FS method with either Gamma or Gaussians produced lower attenuation estimates than pSTL-FS, AMUSE and mechanical testing. The mean attenuation coefficients of the murine livers measured with the pSTL-FS (Gamma and Gaussian functions) methods were consistently higher than those computed with the standard FS methods but lower than those computed with the AMUSE method. Our results demonstrated that combining the pSTL method with FS method provided more robust estimates of the SWA coefficient. For the murine livers, a Gamma distribution is more representative of the shear wave frequency spectrum than a Gaussian distribution.</p

Image2_Merging single-track location Elastographic imaging with the frequency shift method improves shear wave attenuation measurements.tiff

The frequency shift (FS) method is emerging as the standard approach for estimating shear wave attenuation coefficient (SWA). However, measurement noise can negatively impact the FS method’s accuracy, especially when employed in vivo. We hypothesized that combining plane wave single-track location shear wave elastography imaging with the FS method would reduce this problem. To test our hypothesis, we performed studies on calibrated phantoms and two groups of in vivo murine liver: control and obese mice. We evaluated the performance of various SWA methods, including the plane wave single-track location frequency shift (pSTL-FS) method that we recently developed, the original FS method, and the attenuation-measuring-shear-wave ultrasound elastography (AMUSE) method. We also assessed the effectiveness of assuming a Gaussian distribution versus a Gamma distribution for the shear wave spectrum when estimating SWA coefficients with the pSTL-FS and FS methods. The actual SWA coefficients of the phantoms were determined by performing independent mechanical testing on representative samples. The accuracy incurred when estimating SWA ranged from 84.69% to 97.55% for pSTL-FS (Gamma), 51.37%–72.18% for pSTL-FS (Gaussian), 40.33%–57.00% for FS (Gamma), 39.33%–55.37% for FS (Gaussian), and 59.25%–99.22% for AMUSE. The results of studies performed on murine livers (n = 10) revealed that assuming a Gaussian distribution during pSTL-FS imaging resulted in lower attenuation values than when a Gamma distribution was assumed. We also observed that pSTL-FS (Gamma) resulted in the highest significant difference between control and obese mice than all other approaches (p-value <0.0001). We also observed that the standard FS method with either Gamma or Gaussians produced lower attenuation estimates than pSTL-FS, AMUSE and mechanical testing. The mean attenuation coefficients of the murine livers measured with the pSTL-FS (Gamma and Gaussian functions) methods were consistently higher than those computed with the standard FS methods but lower than those computed with the AMUSE method. Our results demonstrated that combining the pSTL method with FS method provided more robust estimates of the SWA coefficient. For the murine livers, a Gamma distribution is more representative of the shear wave frequency spectrum than a Gaussian distribution.</p

Shear wave elastography can stratify rectal cancer response to short-course radiation therapy

Abstract Rectal cancer is a deadly disease typically treated using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. To reduce the occurrence of mesorectal excision surgery for patients whose tumors regress from the neoadjuvant therapy alone, conventional imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is used to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. In this work, we hypothesize that shear wave elastography offers valuable insights into tumor response to short-course radiation therapy (SCRT)—information that could help distinguish radiation-responsive from radiation-non-responsive tumors and shed light on changes in the tumor microenvironment that may affect radiation response. To test this hypothesis, we performed elastographic imaging on murine rectal tumors (n = 32) on days 6, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 23, and 25 post-tumor cell injection. The study revealed that radiation-responsive and non-radiation-responsive tumors had different mechanical properties. Specifically, radiation-non-responsive tumors showed significantly higher shear wave speed SWS (p < 0.01) than radiation-responsive tumors 11 days after SCRT. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in shear wave attenuation (SWA) (p < 0.01) in radiation-non-responsive tumors 16 days after SCRT compared to SWA measured just one day after SCRT. These results demonstrate the potential of shear wave elastography to provide valuable insights into tumor response to SCRT and aid in exploring the underlying biology that drives tumors' responses to radiation