Photochemical Yields in Ribonuclease and Oxidized Glutathione Irradiated at Different Wavelengths in the Ultraviolet

The quantum yields for the disruption of various amino acids in glutathione and ribonuclease by 229, 254, 265, and 280 nm UV photons have been determined. The results of the measurements on the destruction of tyrosine and histidine and the loss of enzymic function in RNAse and the disruption of cystine in both compounds lead to the following conclusions: (a) The photodestruction of some and perhaps many constituent amino acid residues does not cause RNAse inactivation. (b) Contrary to the basic premise of proposals made by other authors, the photochemical yields of constituent residues in a protein are not the same as that for the same amino acids in solution alone—the difference is a function of the exciting wavelength. Further, the extent of histidine destruction varies by a large factor among three proteins. (c) Consistent with previous predictions, the present results show that photons absorbed in the aromatic residues of RNAse cause the disruption of cystines elsewhere in the enzyme. (d) Although cystine disruption appears to be the most prevalent mode of RNAse inactivation by photons of the four wavelengths studied, some of the minor mechanisms leading to loss of enzymic function may vary with the UV energy

The effect of environment on cystine disruption by ultraviolet light

When cystine is irradiated at pH 1 by 254-nm u.v. the following yields are observed: 4 cystines → 5.2 cysteines + 2.8NH3. Thus, SH production accounts for only 0.65 of the cystine destruction; further C-S breakage to give alanine or serine is not efficient. The yields for cystine and glutathione destruction are essentially the same at pH 1. However the presence of the glutamic and glycine residues stabilize the cystine in glutathione so that NH3 is not lost until the peptide bonds are hydrolyzed. Increasing the pH from 1 to 8.6 increases the yield of cystine destruction in glutathione by 50 per cent. The yield of cystine destruction is greater in both compounds when O2 is present during irradiation (e. g. the cysteic acid yield in glutathione is increased by 50 times). The overall production of SH varies by a factor of 2 in the four proteins-insulin, RNase, trypsin and lysozyme. The present data further support the earlier observation that radiation damage is quite non-random in RNase: at least two and perhaps three of the four constituent cystines must be disrupted before activity is lost: i.e. the most radiosensitive cystines are not critical for enzymic activity. Similarly, in both trypsin and lysozyme the integrity of the most radiosensitive cystines also does not appear to be critical for the retention of enzymic potential. In insulin, however, all three cystines appear to be crucial for activity and to have approximately equal radiosensitivities. These differences in sensitivity of cystines in different proteins must depend specifically upon energy transfer and/or chemical interactions between the chromophoric groups. If yields are calculated on the basis of those quanta absorbed only in the cystines, values about 5 to 8 times greater than those in the model compounds cystine and oxixized glutathione are obtained. The yields of cystine destruction are much higher in those protiens which contain trypotophan