Burnout among surgeons before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international survey

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had many significant impacts within the surgical realm, and surgeons have been obligated to reconsider almost every aspect of daily clinical practice. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study reported in compliance with the CHERRIES guidelines and conducted through an online platform from June 14th to July 15th, 2020. The primary outcome was the burden of burnout during the pandemic indicated by the validated Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure. Results: Nine hundred fifty-four surgeons completed the survey. The median length of practice was 10 years; 78.2% included were male with a median age of 37 years old, 39.5% were consultants, 68.9% were general surgeons, and 55.7% were affiliated with an academic institution. Overall, there was a significant increase in the mean burnout score during the pandemic; longer years of practice and older age were significantly associated with less burnout. There were significant reductions in the median number of outpatient visits, operated cases, on-call hours, emergency visits, and research work, so, 48.2% of respondents felt that the training resources were insufficient. The majority (81.3%) of respondents reported that their hospitals were included in the management of COVID-19, 66.5% felt their roles had been minimized; 41% were asked to assist in non-surgical medical practices, and 37.6% of respondents were included in COVID-19 management. Conclusions: There was a significant burnout among trainees. Almost all aspects of clinical and research activities were affected with a significant reduction in the volume of research, outpatient clinic visits, surgical procedures, on-call hours, and emergency cases hindering the training. Trial registration: The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04433286" on 16/06/2020

Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search

Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Peer reviewe

Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

Background: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients. Methods: We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973. Findings: Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96–1·28). Interpretation: No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients. METHODS: We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973. FINDINGS: Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96-1·28). INTERPRETATION: No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Mortality from gastrointestinal congenital anomalies at 264 hospitals in 74 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study

Summary Background Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of mortality in children younger than 5 years globally. Many gastrointestinal congenital anomalies are fatal without timely access to neonatal surgical care, but few studies have been done on these conditions in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared outcomes of the seven most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries globally, and identified factors associated with mortality. Methods We did a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of patients younger than 16 years, presenting to hospital for the first time with oesophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal atresia, gastroschisis, exomphalos, anorectal malformation, and Hirschsprung’s disease. Recruitment was of consecutive patients for a minimum of 1 month between October, 2018, and April, 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, clinical status, interventions, and outcomes using the REDCap platform. Patients were followed up for 30 days after primary intervention, or 30 days after admission if they did not receive an intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality for all conditions combined and each condition individually, stratified by country income status. We did a complete case analysis. Findings We included 3849 patients with 3975 study conditions (560 with oesophageal atresia, 448 with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 681 with intestinal atresia, 453 with gastroschisis, 325 with exomphalos, 991 with anorectal malformation, and 517 with Hirschsprung’s disease) from 264 hospitals (89 in high-income countries, 166 in middleincome countries, and nine in low-income countries) in 74 countries. Of the 3849 patients, 2231 (58·0%) were male. Median gestational age at birth was 38 weeks (IQR 36–39) and median bodyweight at presentation was 2·8 kg (2·3–3·3). Mortality among all patients was 37 (39·8%) of 93 in low-income countries, 583 (20·4%) of 2860 in middle-income countries, and 50 (5·6%) of 896 in high-income countries (p<0·0001 between all country income groups). Gastroschisis had the greatest difference in mortality between country income strata (nine [90·0%] of ten in lowincome countries, 97 [31·9%] of 304 in middle-income countries, and two [1·4%] of 139 in high-income countries; p≤0·0001 between all country income groups). Factors significantly associated with higher mortality for all patients combined included country income status (low-income vs high-income countries, risk ratio 2·78 [95% CI 1·88–4·11], p<0·0001; middle-income vs high-income countries, 2·11 [1·59–2·79], p<0·0001), sepsis at presentation (1·20 [1·04–1·40], p=0·016), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at primary intervention (ASA 4–5 vs ASA 1–2, 1·82 [1·40–2·35], p<0·0001; ASA 3 vs ASA 1–2, 1·58, [1·30–1·92], p<0·0001]), surgical safety checklist not used (1·39 [1·02–1·90], p=0·035), and ventilation or parenteral nutrition unavailable when needed (ventilation 1·96, [1·41–2·71], p=0·0001; parenteral nutrition 1·35, [1·05–1·74], p=0·018). Administration of parenteral nutrition (0·61, [0·47–0·79], p=0·0002) and use of a peripherally inserted central catheter (0·65 [0·50–0·86], p=0·0024) or percutaneous central line (0·69 [0·48–1·00], p=0·049) were associated with lower mortality. Interpretation Unacceptable differences in mortality exist for gastrointestinal congenital anomalies between lowincome, middle-income, and high-income countries. Improving access to quality neonatal surgical care in LMICs will be vital to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 of ending preventable deaths in neonates and children younger than 5 years by 2030

Prédiction par apprentissage automatique des évènements critiques présentés par les patients admis aux urgences : de la prédiction pré-hospitalière à l'optimisation du parcours de soin

The challenge of adjusting the resources deployed to match the level of severity for each patient is an important issue for the sustainability and improvement of the healthcare system. The simultaneous development of database interoperability, enabling the collection of standardized data, and of predictive statistics is opening up new prospects in this field, suggesting that it may be possible to train predictive models to improve the service provided to patients by individualizing their journey through the care system, while rationalizing the collective effort required for their care. The aim of this thesis was to predict the occurrence of critical events in emergency patients, using models based on machine learning. Three articles are included in this work. The first was aimed at detecting pre-hospital cardiac arrest using voice recordings of witness calls to the SAMU. To this end, several models were developed to detect cardiac arrest based on the acoustic characteristics of the caller's voice. The second article focused on optimizing the diagnosis of COVID-19 by integrating reference RT-PCR diagnostic tests with other clinico-biological elements. Machine learning models were developed to improve diagnostic performance in the context of an emerging pandemic, based on the hypothesis of a "zero-COVID" strategy. The objective of the third article was to predict four critical events in hospitalized patients after a passage through the emergency department: death, intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and palliative care. Random forest models were developed, integrating the most exhaustive data possible to provide in-depth patient profiling: admission dates, length of stay, history, medical observations, vital signs, biological examinations and imaging reports. This article demonstrated an excellent performance in predicting the four events of interest. Limitations were also identified, such as the need to validate these approaches in real clinical settings. This research work makes a significant contribution to the prediction of critical events, and will enable the development of applications designed to improve the care of patients faced with life-threatening clinical situations.La mise en adéquation des moyens déployés avec le niveau de gravité de chaque patient est un enjeu important pour la pérennisation et l’amélioration du système de santé. L’essor simultané de l’interopérabilité des bases de données permettant la collecte de données normalisées et des statistiques prédictives ouvre de nouvelles perspectives dans ce domaine en laissant supposer qu’il serait possible d’entrainer des modèles prédictifs permettant à la fois d’améliorer le service rendu aux patients en individualisant leur parcours de soin tout en rationalisant l’effort collectif nécessaire à leur prise en charge. Cette thèse avait pour objectif de de prédire la survenue d’évènements critiques chez les patients ayant recours aux urgences en utilisant des modèles basés sur l’apprentissage automatique. Trois articles composent ce travail de recherche. Le premier visait à détecter les arrêts cardiaques préhospitaliers en utilisant les enregistrements vocaux des appels des témoins au SAMU. Dans cette optique, plusieurs modèles ont été développés pour détecter les arrêts cardiaques en se basant sur les caractéristiques acoustiques de la voix de l’appelant. Le deuxième article se concentrait sur l’optimisation du diagnostic de COVID-19 en intégrant les tests diagnostiques de référence de type RT-PCR à d’autres éléments clinico-biologiques. Les modèles d’apprentissage automatique développés permettaient une augmentation des performances diagnostiques en ce contexte de pandémie débutante dans l’hypothèse d’une stratégie « zero-COVID ». Le troisième article avait pour objectif la prédiction de quatre évènements critiques chez les patients hospitalisés après un passage aux urgences : la survenue d’un décès, la nécessité d’ intubation, la réanimation cardiopulmonaire et la décision de réaliser des soins palliatifs. Des modèles de forêt aléatoire y ont été développés en intégrant des données les plus exhaustives possibles afin d’établir un profil détaillé des patients : dates d’amission, temps de passages, antécédents, observations médicales, constantes vitales, examens biologiques et compte rendus d’imagerie. Une excellente performance pour la prédiction des quatre événements d’intérêt à été retrouvée dans cet article. Des limites ont par ailleurs été identifiées, comme la nécessité de valider ces approches dans des contextes cliniques réels et d’explorer davantage leur interprétabilité en pratique quotidienne. Ce travail de recherche apporte une contribution significative pour la prédiction des évènements critiques et permettra le développement d’ applications visant à améliorer le parcours de soin des patients confrontés à une situation clinique susceptible de mettre en jeu leur pronostic vital

Machine learning is the key to diagnose COVID-19: a proof-of-concept study

International audienceThe reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay is the accepted standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis. As any test, RT-PCR provides false negative results that can be rectified by clinicians by confronting clinical, biological and imaging data. The combination of RT-PCR and chest-CT could improve diagnosis performance, but this would requires considerable resources for its rapid use in all patients with suspected COVID-19. The potential contribution of machine learning in this situation has not been fully evaluated. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate machine learning models using routine clinical and laboratory data to improve the performance of RT-PCR and chest-CT for COVID-19 diagnosis among post-emergency hospitalized patients. All adults admitted to the ED for suspected COVID-19, and then hospitalized at Rennes academic hospital, France, between March 20, 2020 and May 5, 2020 were included in the study. Three model types were created: logistic regression, random forest, and neural network. Each model was trained to diagnose COVID-19 using different sets of variables. Area under the receiving operator characteristics curve (AUC) was the primary outcome to evaluate model’s performances. 536 patients were included in the study: 106 in the COVID group, 430 in the NOT-COVID group. The AUC values of chest-CT and RT-PCR increased from 0.778 to 0.892 and from 0.852 to 0.930, respectively, with the contribution of machine learning. After generalization, machine learning models will allow increasing chest-CT and RT-PCR performances for COVID-19 diagnosis

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection by Machine Learning Based on the Phonetic Characteristics of the Caller’s Voice

International audienceINTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health issue. The prognosis is closely related to the time from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation. Resuscitation efforts are frequently initiated at the request of emergency call center professionals who are specifically trained to identify critical conditions over the phone. However, 25% of OHCAs are not recognized during the first call. Therefore, it would be interesting to develop automated computer systems to recognize OHCA on the phone. The aim of this study was to build and evaluate machine learning models for OHCA recognition based on the phonetic characteristics of the caller’s voice. METHODS: All patients for whom a call was done to the emergency call center of Rennes, France, between 01/01/2017 and 01/01/2019 were eligible. The predicted variable was OHCA presence. Predicting variables were collected by computer-automatized phonetic analysis of the call. They were based on the following voice parameters: fundamental frequency, formants, intensity, jitter, shimmer, harmonic to noise ratio, number of voice breaks, and number of periods. Three models were generated using binary logistic regression, random forest, and neural network. The area under the curve (AUC) was the primary outcome used to evaluate each model performance. RESULTS: 820 patients were included in the study. The best model to predict OHCA was random forest (AUC=74.9, 95% CI=67.4-82.4). CONCLUSION: Machine learning models based on the acoustic characteristics of the caller’s voice can recognize OHCA. The integration of the acoustic parameters identified in this study will help to design decision-making support systems to improve OHCA detection over the phone

Doppler sonography of cerebral blood flow for early prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest DOTAC study

International audienc

At-Risk Drinking Is Independently Associated With Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients

International audienc